A wearable system for multi-segment foot kinetics measurement.

This study aims to design a wearable system for kinetics measurement of multi-segment foot joints in long-distance walking and to investigate its suitability for clinical evaluations. The wearable system consisted of inertial sensors (3D gyroscopes and 3D accelerometers) on toes, forefoot, hindfoot, and shank, and a plantar pressure insole. After calibration in a laboratory, 10 healthy elderly subjects and 12 patients with ankle osteoarthritis walked 50m twice wearing this system. Using inverse dynamics, 3D forces, moments, and power were calculated in the joint sections among toes, forefoot, hindfoot, and shank. Compared to those we previously estimated for a one-segment foot model, the sagittal and transverse moments and power in the ankle joint, as measured via multi-segment foot model, showed a normalized RMS difference of less than 11%, 14%, and 13%, respectively, for healthy subjects, and 13%, 15%, and 14%, for patients. Similar to our previous study, the coronal moments were not analyzed. Maxima-minima values of anterior-posterior and vertical force, sagittal moment, and power in shank-hindfoot and hindfoot-forefoot joints were significantly different between patients and healthy subjects. Except for power, the inter-subject repeatability of these parameters was CMC>0.90 for healthy subjects and CMC>0.70 for patients. Repeatability of these parameters was lower for the forefoot-toes joint. The proposed measurement system estimated multi-segment foot joints kinetics with acceptable repeatability but showed difference, compared to those previously estimated for the one-segment foot model. These parameters also could distinguish patients from healthy subjects. Thus, this system is suggested for outcome evaluations of foot treatments.

[1]  Michael J Rainbow,et al.  Impact of mediolateral segmentation on a multi-segment foot model. , 2006, Gait & posture.

[2]  B. MacWilliams,et al.  Foot kinematics and kinetics during adolescent gait. , 2003, Gait & posture.

[3]  A Leardini,et al.  GAIT analysis in patients operated with a novel total ankle prosthesis. , 2009, Gait & posture.

[4]  Julien Favre,et al.  Measurement of multi-segment foot joint angles during gait using a wearable system. , 2012, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[5]  K. Aminian,et al.  A comparison between joint coordinate system and attitude vector for multi-segment foot kinematics. , 2012, Journal of biomechanics.

[6]  P. Veltink,et al.  Evaluation of instrumented shoes for ambulatory assessment of ground reaction forces. , 2007, Gait & posture.

[7]  K Aminian,et al.  Ambulatory assessment of 3D ground reaction force using plantar pressure distribution. , 2010, Gait & posture.

[8]  B M Jolles,et al.  Functional calibration procedure for 3D knee joint angle description using inertial sensors. , 2009, Journal of biomechanics.

[9]  Dustin A. Bruening,et al.  Analysis of a kinetic multi-segment foot model part II: kinetics and clinical implications. , 2012, Gait & posture.

[10]  A. Cappozzo,et al.  Human movement analysis using stereophotogrammetry. Part 1: theoretical background. , 2005, Gait & posture.

[11]  K. Aminian,et al.  Quaternion-based fusion of gyroscopes and accelerometers to improve 3D angle measurement , 2006 .

[12]  K Aminian,et al.  Outcome evaluation of ankle osteoarthritis treatments: plantar pressure analysis during relatively long-distance walking. , 2011, Clinical biomechanics.

[13]  K Aminian,et al.  Ambulatory measurement of ankle kinetics for clinical applications. , 2011, Journal of biomechanics.

[14]  K Aminian,et al.  Multi-segment foot kinematics after total ankle replacement and ankle arthrodesis during relatively long-distance gait. , 2012, Gait & posture.

[15]  Catherine Dehollain,et al.  Gait assessment in Parkinson's disease: toward an ambulatory system for long-term monitoring , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[16]  B M Jolles,et al.  Evaluation of a mixed approach combining stationary and wearable systems to monitor gait over long distance. , 2010, Journal of biomechanics.

[17]  Peter H. Veltink,et al.  Ambulatory Assessment of Ankle and Foot Dynamics , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[18]  Martin A. M. Gijs,et al.  Flexible polyimide-based force sensor , 2012 .

[19]  D. Winter,et al.  Biomechanical model of the human foot: kinematics and kinetics during the stance phase of walking. , 1993, Journal of biomechanics.

[20]  Philippe C Dixon,et al.  Ankle and midfoot kinetics during normal gait: a multi-segment approach. , 2012, Journal of biomechanics.

[21]  Vinzenz von Tscharner,et al.  Gait analysis in ankle osteoarthritis and total ankle replacement. , 2007, Clinical biomechanics.

[22]  Dustin A. Bruening,et al.  Measured and estimated ground reaction forces for multi-segment foot models. , 2010, Journal of biomechanics.

[23]  K. Aminian,et al.  Segmentation of foot and ankle complex based on kinematic criteria , 2011, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.

[24]  Henk J. Stam,et al.  Ambulatory monitoring of mobility-related activities: the initial phase of the development of an activity monitor , 1995 .