A Hand-Held Robot for Precise and Safe PIVC

Peripheral intravenous catheterization (PIVC) is pervasively needed in hospitals. However, given the levels of precision and controllability needed for PIVC, this operation suffers from very low success rates. For young patients, about half of the first insertions fail. Robotic systems have great potential to effectively assist the operation and improve the success rates, which has led to the recent development of different robots to automate PIVC. These robots are equipped with various sensors and actuators, resulting in expensive, complex, and grounded machines. Yet, fully automating the operation is neither needed nor desired, as current clinical preference is oriented toward keeping the practitioner involved and in control of the operation. Therefore, in this study we proposed an innovative smart hand-held robotic device, named CathBot, that enhances intra-operative control during PIVC with automatic features that guarantee very high success rates. It exploits an electrical impedance sensor to detect the venipuncture and a crank-slider mechanism to automate the subsequent cannula advancement and needle retraction. Here, CathBot is first characterized through engineering experiments that demonstrate its capability to successfully perform the whole PIVC operation on a realistic baby arm phantom without human involvement. Subsequent experiments evaluate the device with naïve subjects on the same realistic pediatric PIVC scenario. The results demonstrate that CathBot can significantly improve the PIVC performance. Naïve subjects achieved an average 86% success rate, and 80% of the subjects succeeded in their first attempt. These results demonstrate the technology has potential to greatly improve both the clinician's and the patient's PIVC experience.

[1]  Darwin G. Caldwell,et al.  SDOP: A smart handheld device for over puncture prevention during pediatric peripheral intravenous catheterization , 2018, 2018 International Symposium on Medical Robotics (ISMR).

[2]  R. Holleran,et al.  Difficult venous access in children: taking control. , 2009, Journal of emergency nursing: JEN : official publication of the Emergency Department Nurses Association.

[3]  A. Emmerson,et al.  Extravasation injuries on regional neonatal units , 2004, Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition.

[4]  Aleksandar Zivanovic,et al.  The Development of a Haptic Robot to Take Blood Samples from the Forearm , 2001, MICCAI.

[5]  Zhuoqi Cheng,et al.  A New Venous Entry Detection Method Based on Electrical Bio-impedance Sensing , 2018, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[6]  Martin L. Yarmush,et al.  The System Design and Evaluation of a 7-DOF Image-Guided Venipuncture Robot , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[7]  Brian L. Davies,et al.  Robotic surgery: from autonomous systems to intelligent tools , 2010, Robotica.

[8]  Helen Ogden-Grable,et al.  Phlebotomy Puncture Juncture Preventing Phlebotomy Errors—Potential For Harming Your Patients , 2005 .

[9]  Antonio Riera,et al.  Remember the Saphenous: Ultrasound Evaluation and Intravenous Site Selection of Peripheral Veins in Young Children , 2011, Pediatric emergency care.

[10]  N. Goel,et al.  Saline irrigation for the management of skin extravasation injury in neonates. , 2017, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[11]  J. Brinkley,et al.  Resource utilization and cost of inserting peripheral intravenous catheters in hospitalized children. , 2013, Hospital pediatrics.

[13]  E. Winslow,et al.  Variables influencing intravenous catheter insertion difficulty and failure: an analysis of 339 intravenous catheter insertions. , 2005, Heart & lung : the journal of critical care.

[14]  L. Gorski Infusion nursing standards of practice. , 2007, Journal of infusion nursing : the official publication of the Infusion Nurses Society.