Methods for Visitor Monitoring in Recreational and Protected Areas : An Overview

The objective of this paper is to present a systematic overview on methods used for visitor monitoring in recreational areas. Emphasis is given on quantitative methods such as direct observation, video observation, counting devices and registration books. The various approaches are discussed with regard to practical, legal and organisational aspects, such as costs, maintenance requirements, dependence on infrastructure (e.g. electricity), risk of vandalism or suitability for remote and ecologically sensitive locations. For the design of a visitor monitoring scheme in a specific recreational area it is necessary to determine the best combination of devices and methods, depending on the objectives of the monitoring program. This relates also to the temporal resolution of monitoring activities (permanent, periodic, selective). In areas where the recreational use is largely depending on external factors such as weather, daytime and season, the representativity of a sampling scheme becomes crucial for the statistic validity of the obtained data. As visitor monitoring can also be regarded as an interference with the privacy of the persons being monitored, ethic aspects of the application of the various methods must also be addressed.

[1]  D. Cole,et al.  Wilderness recreation use estimation: a handbook of methods and systems. , 2000 .

[2]  Jim Fowler,et al.  Practical Statistics for Field Biology , 1991 .

[3]  G. Stankey,et al.  Wilderness use and users: trends and projections. , 1990 .

[4]  S. Harris,et al.  Abundance and habitat selection of foraging vespertilionid bats in Britain: a landscape-scale approach , 1995 .

[5]  M. Glancy Participant Observation in the Recreation Setting , 1986 .

[6]  Robert E. Manning,et al.  Estimating social carrying capacity through computer simulation modeling: an application to Arches National Park, Utah , 2001 .

[7]  T. Flognfeldt,et al.  Traveler geographic origin and market segmentation: the multi trips destination case. , 1999 .

[8]  J. M. Hellawell,et al.  Development of a rationale for monitoring , 1991 .

[9]  S. Vries Vraag naar natuurgebonden recreatie in kaart gebracht; inclusief een ruimtelijke confrontatie met het lokale aanbod , 1999 .

[10]  S. Harris,et al.  Foraging habitat preferences of vespertilionid bats in Britain , 1996 .

[11]  F. L. Campbell Participant Observation in Outdoor Recreation. , 1970 .

[12]  Ralph T. Clarke,et al.  Land classification for strategic ecological survey , 1996 .

[13]  Alastair M. Morrison,et al.  Evaluating Different Bases for Market Segmentation , 2001 .

[14]  M. Ely,et al.  Systematic observation as a recreation research tool. , 1981 .

[15]  G. Wilson,et al.  Changes in the British badger population, 1988 to 1997 , 1997 .

[16]  H. R. Gimblett,et al.  Intelligent recreation agents in a virtual GIS world , 2000 .

[17]  Michael Adam Sex in the Snow : Canadian Social Values at the End of the Millennium , 1998 .

[18]  S. Harris,et al.  Factors determining the abundance of vespertilionid bats in Britain: geographical, land class and local habitat relationships , 1996 .