OBJECTIVE
This study examined a step toward providing a universal prevention program to all students while targeting those at risk.
METHOD
Seventy-eight 10th-grade female students were provided an on-line eating disorder prevention program and randomized to participate in (1) a higher risk and higher motivated group, (2) a lower risk or lower motivated group, or (3) a combined group.
RESULTS
The students in the first group made significantly fewer negative and more positive comments in the on-line group discussion than the higher risk and higher motivated participants in the combined group. However, there were no differences among groups on outcome measures.
DISCUSSION
The results suggest that, because it is relatively easy to provide interventions with separate groups, it seems appropriate to do so, if for no other reason than to minimize the few very negative comments that were posted by students that might have created an adverse environment for the higher risk-participants that the intervention specifically targets.
[1]
G. Zimet,et al.
The Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support: a confirmation study.
,
1991,
Journal of clinical psychology.
[2]
Denise E. Wilfley,et al.
Reducing risk factors for eating disorders: comparison of an Internet- and a classroom-delivered psychoeducational program.
,
2000
.
[3]
I. Litt,et al.
Factors associated with eating disorder symptoms in a community sample of 6th and 7th grade girls.
,
2010,
The International journal of eating disorders.
[4]
M. Lieberman,et al.
Problems in Assessing Prevalence and Membership Characteristics of Self-Help Group Participants
,
1993
.
[5]
C. Fairburn,et al.
Assessment of eating disorders: interview or self-report questionnaire?
,
1994,
The International journal of eating disorders.