Can Narrative Advertisement and eWOM Influence Generation Z Purchase Intentions?

Digital platforms have made Generation Z able to listen to the story from both sides, i.e., the brand’s promotional messages, and the consumers’ experiences. To capture an audience’s attention on endless entertainment and informational platforms, narrative advertisement is deployed to trigger emotions and feelings. As digital communities continue to grow, both brands and consumers are using narrative advertising to share their opinions. Hence, the purpose of this research was to investigate how the upcoming generation of consumers will be affected by the two information sources, i.e., the brands via narrative advertising, and peer consumers through electronic word-of-mouth (eWOM). Furthermore, the mediated role of persuasion knowledge was examined among the constructs. Theoretical foundations were empirically tested using quantitative research analysis. The data was collected from a sample of 304 Generation Z respondents from Pakistan. Structural equation modeling (SEM) using AMOS 22.0 was executed to determine cause and effect relationships. This study offers new evidence regarding the effective mobilization of eWOM and narrative advertising in the context of Generation Z. The results indicate narrative advertising to have strong effects on Generation Z purchase intentions as compared to eWOM.

[1]  C. Su,et al.  U.S. Sustainable Food Market Generation Z Consumer Segments , 2019, Sustainability.

[2]  M. Domínguez-Amorós,et al.  Lack of Association between the Reasons for and Time Spent Doing Physical Activity , 2020, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[3]  Xiaoli Nan,et al.  Friends Don’t Let Friends Smoke: How Storytelling and Social Distance Influence Nonsmokers’ Responses to Antismoking Messages , 2018, Health communication.

[4]  Nils Magne Larsen,et al.  How to grow brand post engagement on Facebook and Twitter for airlines? An empirical investigation of design and content factors , 2019, Journal of Air Transport Management.

[5]  M. Fransen,et al.  Framing in Entertainment-Education: Effects on Processes of Narrative Persuasion , 2017, Health communication.

[6]  Umer Zaman,et al.  Understanding the soft side of software projects: An empirical study on the interactive effects of social skills and political skills on complexity – performance relationship , 2019, International Journal of Project Management.

[7]  Elmira Djafarova,et al.  Exploring the credibility of online celebrities' Instagram profiles in influencing the purchase decisions of young female users , 2017, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[8]  Jamshid Ali Turi,et al.  Green Brand Benefits and Brand Outcomes: The Mediating Role of Green Brand Image , 2020 .

[9]  S. Hartini,et al.  Narrative Online Advertising as External Variable in the Development of the Technology Acceptance Model of Go-Pay for Millennials , 2020 .

[10]  Magdalena Wojcieszak,et al.  How to Improve Attitudes Toward Disliked Groups , 2016, Commun. Res..

[11]  Francisco Mochón,et al.  Happiness and Technology: Special Consideration of Digital Technology and Internet , 2018, Int. J. Interact. Multim. Artif. Intell..

[12]  Radoslaw Nielek,et al.  Influence of consumer reviews on online purchasing decisions in older and younger adults , 2018, Decis. Support Syst..

[13]  Shai M. Dromi,et al.  Advertising morality: maintaining moral worth in a stigmatized profession , 2018 .

[14]  J. Cheah,et al.  The Impact of Social Media Influencers on Purchase Intention and the Mediation Effect of Customer Attitude , 2017 .

[15]  Chris Evans,et al.  The influence of eWOM in social media on consumers' purchase intentions: An extended approach to information adoption , 2016, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[16]  D. Brinberg,et al.  Happily Ever After: How Ending Valence Influences Narrative Persuasion in Cautionary Stories , 2016 .

[17]  Anne Bartsch,et al.  Personalized charity advertising. Can personalized prosocial messages promote empathy, attitude change, and helping intentions toward stigmatized social groups? , 2018, International Journal of Advertising.

[18]  James Price Dillard,et al.  Meta-analytic evidence for the persuasive effect of narratives on beliefs, attitudes, intentions, and behaviors , 2016 .

[19]  Muddasar Ghani Khwaja,et al.  Configuring the Evolving Role of eWOM on the Consumers Information Adoption , 2020, Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity.

[20]  Chetna Kudeshia,et al.  Social eWOM: does it affect the brand attitude and purchase intention of brands? , 2017 .

[21]  Sabina Lissitsa,et al.  Four generational cohorts and hedonic m-shopping: association between personality traits and purchase intention , 2019, Electronic Commerce Research.

[22]  Sang‐Hyun Kim,et al.  Impacts of Sustainable Information Technology Capabilities on Information Security Assimilation: The Moderating Effects of Policy—Technology Balance , 2020, Sustainability.

[23]  Umer Zaman Examining the effect of xenophobia on “transnational” mega construction project (MCP) success , 2020 .

[24]  Moniek Buijzen,et al.  Disclosing the persuasive nature of advergames: moderation effects of mood on brand responses via persuasion knowledge , 2015 .

[25]  Sophie C. Boerman,et al.  The effects of brand placement disclosures on skepticism and brand memory , 2013 .

[26]  Pablo Muñoz-Gallego,et al.  Tourists’ willingness to pay for an accommodation: the effect of eWOM and internal reference price , 2017 .

[27]  Jan Lies,et al.  Marketing Intelligence and Big Data: Digital Marketing Techniques on their Way to Becoming Social Engineering Techniques in Marketing , 2019, Int. J. Interact. Multim. Artif. Intell..

[28]  Wasim Ahmed,et al.  eWOM source credibility, perceived risk and food product customer's information adoption , 2016, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[29]  S. C. Boerman,et al.  Effects of sponsorship disclosure timing on the processing of sponsored content: a study on the effectiveness of European disclosure regulations , 2014 .

[30]  M. Farzin,et al.  eWOM through social networking sites and impact on purchase intention and brand image in Iran , 2018 .

[31]  M. Barbosa,et al.  Online Engagement and the Role of Digital Influencers in Product Endorsement on Instagram , 2020, Journal of Relationship Marketing.

[32]  Tung-Ju Wu,et al.  “Touching with heart, reasoning by truth!” The impact of brand cues on mini-film advertising effect , 2020 .

[33]  Katheryn R. Christy I, You, or He: Examining the Impact of Point of View on Narrative Persuasion , 2018 .

[34]  Umer Zaman,et al.  Linking transformational leadership and “multi-dimensions” of project success , 2019, International Journal of Managing Projects in Business.

[35]  Jamshid Ali Turi,et al.  Extension of planned behavioral theory to consumer behaviors in green hotel , 2019, Heliyon.

[36]  Nathaniel J. Evans,et al.  Going Native: Effects of Disclosure Position and Language on the Recognition and Evaluation of Online Native Advertising , 2016 .

[37]  Jae Sung Choi,et al.  Empirical Study on the Factors Affecting Individuals' Switching Intention to Augmented/Virtual Reality Content Services Based on Push-Pull-Mooring Theory , 2019, Inf..

[38]  Johannes Knoll Advertising in social media: a review of empirical evidence , 2016 .

[39]  Hamed Haddouche,et al.  Generation Z and the tourist experience: tourist stories and use of social networks , 2018 .

[40]  Dwayne D. Gremler,et al.  Electronic word-of-mouth via consumer-opinion platforms: What motivates consumers to articulate themselves on the Internet? , 2004 .

[41]  EvansChris,et al.  The influence of eWOM in social media on consumers' purchase intentions , 2016 .

[42]  Sun-Hwa Kim,et al.  Narrative persuasion in social media: an empirical study of luxury brand advertising , 2018, Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing.

[43]  Lourdes Baezconde-Garbanati,et al.  Narrative versus Non-narrative: The Role of Identification, Transportation and Emotion in Reducing Health Disparities. , 2013, The Journal of communication.

[44]  D. Brinberg,et al.  Cause‐Related Marketing Persuasion Knowledge: Measuring Consumers' Knowledge and Ability to Interpret CrM Promotions , 2018 .

[45]  E. Malthouse,et al.  Understanding the effects of different review features on purchase probability , 2018, Electronic Word of Mouth as a Promotional Technique.

[46]  Riva H. Tukachinsky,et al.  Narrative Persuasion 2.0: Transportation in Participatory Websites , 2017 .

[47]  E. Mulet,et al.  Users’ reactions captured by means of an EEG headset on viewing the presentation of sustainable designs using verbal narrative , 2018 .

[48]  Glenn T. Hubbard,et al.  The role of storytelling in advertising: Consumer emotion, narrative engagement level, and word‐of‐mouth intention , 2020 .

[49]  Sambashiva Rao Kunja,et al.  Examining the effect of eWOM on the customer purchase intention through value co-creation (VCC) in social networking sites (SNSs) , 2018 .

[50]  P. Valkenburg,et al.  Comparing Children's and Adults' Cognitive Advertising Competences in the Netherlands , 2010 .

[51]  Irene Kamenidou,et al.  Segmenting the Generation Z Cohort University Students Based on Sustainable Food Consumption Behavior: A Preliminary Study , 2019, Sustainability.

[52]  Esther Thorson,et al.  Why Narrative Ads Work: An Integrated Process Explanation , 2017 .

[53]  Peter Wright,et al.  Everyday persuasion knowledge , 1999 .

[54]  Fuyuan Shen,et al.  Narratives in Political Advertising: An Analysis of the Political Advertisements in the 2014 Midterm Elections , 2018 .

[55]  Amin Ansary,et al.  Brand image and equity: the mediating role of brand equity drivers and moderating effects of product type and word of mouth , 2018 .

[56]  R. Duffett The YouTube Marketing Communication Effect on Cognitive, Affective and Behavioural Attitudes among Generation Z Consumers , 2020, Sustainability.

[57]  Saqib Mahmood,et al.  Examining the Effects of eWOM, Trust Inclination, and Information Adoption on Purchase Intentions in an Accelerated Digital Marketing Context , 2020, Inf..

[58]  D. Brinberg,et al.  Reflecting on the journey: Mechanisms in narrative persuasion , 2017 .

[59]  Peter Neijens,et al.  Getting the word out on Twitter: the role of influentials, information brokers and strong ties in building word-of-mouth for brands , 2017 .

[60]  S. Hussain,et al.  Consumers’ Motivational Involvement in eWOM for Information Adoption: The Mediating Role of Organizational Motives , 2020, Frontiers in Psychology.

[61]  Shu-Chuan Chu,et al.  The current state of knowledge on electronic word-of-mouth in advertising research , 2018, Electronic Word of Mouth as a Promotional Technique.

[62]  R. E. Burnkrant,et al.  Effects of Self-Referencing on Persuasion , 1995 .

[63]  Mary Rani Thomas,et al.  Online Website Cues Influencing the Purchase Intention of Generation Z Mediated By Trust , 2018 .

[64]  Elten Briggs,et al.  Tell me a story: The role of narrative transportation and the C-suite in B2B advertising , 2020, Industrial Marketing Management.

[65]  Paul Benjamin Lowry,et al.  Partial Least Squares (PLS) Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) for Building and Testing Behavioral Causal Theory: When to Choose It and How to Use It , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.

[66]  Peeter W. J. Verlegh,et al.  Can Disclosures Lead Consumers to Resist Covert Persuasion? The Important Roles of Disclosure Timing and Type of Response , 2012 .

[67]  H. Widyanto,et al.  Beauty influencer in the digital age: How does it influence purchase intention of generation Z? , 2020 .

[68]  Ciprian Obrad Constraints and Consequences of Online Teaching , 2020, Sustainability.

[69]  You‐kyung Lee The Relationship between Green Country Image, Green Trust, and Purchase Intention of Korean Products: Focusing on Vietnamese Gen Z Consumers , 2020, Sustainability.

[70]  X. Nguyen Factors Impacting on Korean Consumer Goods Purchase Decision of Vietnam’s Generation Z , 2019, Journal of Distribution Science.