Silicate, borosilicate, and borate bioactive glass scaffolds with controllable degradation rate for bone tissue engineering applications. II. In vitro and in vivo biological evaluation.

In Part I, the in vitro degradation of bioactivAR52115e glass scaffolds with a microstructure similar to that of human trabecular bone, but with three different compositions, was investigated as a function of immersion time in a simulated body fluid. The glasses consisted of a silicate (13-93) composition, a borosilicate composition (designated 13-93B1), and a borate composition (13-93B3), in which one-third or all of the SiO2 content of 13-93 was replaced by B2O3, respectively. This work is an extension of Part I, to investigate the effect of the glass composition on the in vitro response of osteogenic MLO-A5 cells to these scaffolds, and on the ability of the scaffolds to support tissue infiltration in a rat subcutaneous implantation model. The results of assays for cell viability and alkaline phosphatase activity showed that the slower degrading silicate 13-93 and borosilicate 13-93B1 scaffolds were far better than the borate 13-93B3 scaffolds in supporting cell proliferation and function. However, all three groups of scaffolds showed the ability to support tissue infiltration in vivo after implantation for 6 weeks. The results indicate that the required bioactivity and degradation rate may be achieved by substituting an appropriate amount of SiO2 in 13-93 glass with B2O3, and that these trabecular glass scaffolds could serve as substrates for the repair and regeneration of contained bone defects.

[1]  P. Millett,et al.  A rapid, quantitative assay for measuring alkaline phosphatase activity in osteoblastic cells in vitro. , 1994, Bone and mineral.

[2]  L. Bonewald,et al.  Mechanism by which MLO-A5 Late Osteoblasts/Early Osteocytes Mineralize in Culture: Similarities with Mineralization of Lamellar Bone , 2006, Calcified Tissue International.

[3]  D. Day,et al.  Effect of Process Variables on the Microstructure of Hollow Hydroxyapatite Microspheres Prepared by a Glass Conversion Method. , 2010, Journal of the American Ceramic Society. American Ceramic Society.

[4]  L. Bonewald,et al.  Establishment of an Osteoid Preosteocyte‐like Cell MLO‐A5 That Spontaneously Mineralizes in Culture , 2001, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[5]  Q. Fu,et al.  Silicate, borosilicate, and borate bioactive glass scaffolds with controllable degradation rate for bone tissue engineering applications. I. Preparation and in vitro degradation. , 2010, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[6]  Deping Wang,et al.  In vitro evaluation of borate-based bioactive glass scaffolds prepared by a polymer foam replication method , 2009 .

[7]  D. Day,et al.  Preparation and bioactive characteristics of a porous 13-93 glass, and fabrication into the articulating surface of a proximal tibia. , 2007, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[8]  D. Day,et al.  Effect of borate glass composition on its conversion to hydroxyapatite and on the proliferation of MC3T3-E1 cells. , 2009, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[9]  D. Day,et al.  Accelerated Conversion of Silicate Bioactive Glass (13‐93) to Hydroxyapatite in Aqueous Phosphate Solution Containing Polyanions , 2009 .