Anaesthesia non-technical skills: Can anaesthetists be trained to reliably use this behavioural marker system in 1 day?

BACKGROUND Performance assessment is becoming increasingly necessary in the medical workplace. Hospitals and patients expect safety, and under-performance by a doctor can compromise standards. By describing and quantifying performance, positive behaviour can be encouraged and unsafe behaviour remedied. Anaesthesia Non-Technical Skills (ANTS) is a behavioural marker system that can be used to assess non-technical skills in the workplace. METHODS We determined whether specialist anaesthetists could be reliably trained to use ANTS at an assessor level in an 8 h programme. Unscripted videos of routine anaesthesia were produced for training and assessment purposes. Twenty-six participants attended rater training. Exercises in behaviour observation, rater error, frame of reference and performance dimension, and the use of ANTS were conducted throughout the day. Five videos were selected for formal assessment and data collected. Intra-class correlations (ICCs) were calculated for each element. RESULTS The accepted value of r>0.7 was not reached. ICC calculated for each element was 0.11-0.62. Comparison of participants scores with those of expert raters showed poor agreement. CONCLUSIONS Anaesthetists could not be trained to reliably use ANTS as a summative assessment tool using our 1 day programme. There was an inadequate correlation of scores between participants and experts. Two major problems contributed to the lack of agreement. Observed behaviours were often misclassified into the incorrect element and safety beliefs varied among anaesthetists. Other reasons for the failure to achieve success and potential future direction are discussed.

[1]  R. Flin,et al.  Non-technical skills of the operating theatre scrub nurse: literature review. , 2008, Journal of advanced nursing.

[2]  Eduardo Salas,et al.  Improving Teamwork in Organizations : Applications of Resource Management Training , 2001 .

[3]  Steven M Downing,et al.  Reliability: on the reproducibility of assessment data , 2004, Medical education.

[4]  R Flin,et al.  Development of a rating system for surgeons' non‐technical skills , 2006, Medical education.

[5]  M. Barón-Maldonado,et al.  Procedures for establishing defensible programmes for assessing practice performance , 2002, Medical education.

[6]  L W T Schuwirth,et al.  Selecting performance assessment methods for experienced physicians , 2002, Medical education.

[7]  Rhona Flin,et al.  Rating non-technical skills: developing a behavioural marker system for use in anaesthesia , 2004, Cognition, Technology & Work.

[8]  R. Flin,et al.  Anaesthetists' Non-Technical Skills (ANTS): evaluation of a behavioural marker system. , 2003, British journal of anaesthesia.

[9]  S. Yentis,et al.  Could ‘safe practice’ be compromising safe practice? Should anaesthetists have to demonstrate that face mask ventilation is possible before giving a neuromuscular blocker? , 2008, Anaesthesia.

[10]  Casey Mulqueen,et al.  Training Raters to Assess Resource Management Skills , 2001 .

[11]  A. Merry,et al.  Mini-clinical evaluation exercise in anaesthesia training. , 2009, British journal of anaesthesia.

[12]  J. Fleiss,et al.  Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. , 1979, Psychological bulletin.