Subregional Anatomical Distribution of T2 Values of Articular Cartilage in Asymptomatic Hips

Objective: A standardized definition of normative T2 values across the articular surface of the hip must be defined in order to fully understand T2 values for detecting early degeneration. Therefore, in this article, we seek to lay foundational methodology for reproducible quantitative evaluation of hip cartilage damage using T2 mapping to determine the normative T2 values in asymptomatic individuals. Design: Nineteen prospectively enrolled asymptomatic volunteers (age 18-35 years, males 10, females 9, alpha angle 49.3º ± 7.2º) were evaluated with a sagittal T2 mapping sequence at 3.0 T magnetic resonance imaging. Acetabular and femoral cartilage was manually segmented directly on the second echo of the T2 mapping sequence by 3 raters, twice. Segmentations were divided into 12 subregions modified from the geographic zone method. Median T2 values within each subregion were compiled for further analysis and interrater and intrarater reliability was assessed. Results: In the femur, the posterior-superior subregion was significantly higher (P ≤ 0.05) than those in the posterior-inferior and anterior-inferior subregions. In the acetabulum, the anterior-inferior subregion was significantly higher (P ≤ 0.001) than in the anterior-superior, middle, and posterior-inferior subregions. T2 values of the posterior-superior subregion were significantly higher (P ≤ 0.05) than the anterior-superior, middle, and posterior-inferior subregions. Interrater agreement was generally fair to good.

[1]  J. T. Bryant,et al.  An in vitro investigation of the acetabular labral seal in hip joint mechanics. , 2003, Journal of biomechanics.

[2]  Anthony Skalak,et al.  Proximal Femoral Anatomy in the Normal Human Population , 2009, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[3]  R. Ojala,et al.  Reproducibility of imaging human knee cartilage by delayed gadolinium-enhanced MRI of cartilage (dGEMRIC) at 1.5 Tesla. , 2009, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[4]  A Guermazi,et al.  Hip Osteoarthritis MRI Scoring System (HOAMS): reliability and associations with radiographic and clinical findings. , 2011, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[5]  Katharine J. Wilson,et al.  Clinically Relevant Subregions of Articular Cartilage of the Hip for Analysis and Reporting Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2014, Cartilage.

[6]  M. Mayerhoefer,et al.  Detection of degenerative cartilage disease: comparison of high-resolution morphological MR and quantitative T2 mapping at 3.0 Tesla. , 2010, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[7]  Derek C. Wilson,et al.  Localized cartilage assessment with three-dimensional dGEMRIC in asymptomatic hips with normal morphology and cam deformity. , 2010, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[8]  M. Beck,et al.  Cartilage damage in femoroacetabular impingement (FAI): preliminary results on comparison of standard diagnostic vs delayed gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of cartilage (dGEMRIC). , 2009, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[9]  Charles P. Ho,et al.  Prevalence of Abnormal Hip Findings in Asymptomatic Participants , 2012, The American journal of sports medicine.

[10]  R. Hinman,et al.  Which is the most useful patient-reported outcome in femoroacetabular impingement? Test–retest reliability of six questionnaires , 2013, British Journal of Sports Medicine.

[11]  S. Trattnig,et al.  Quantitative T2 mapping of the patella at 3.0 T is sensitive to early cartilage degeneration, but also to loading of the knee , 2012, European journal of radiology.

[12]  J. Lysholm,et al.  Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries. , 1985, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[13]  M. Recht,et al.  Advances in Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Articular Cartilage , 2011, The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.

[14]  J. Alonso,et al.  Contact pressures in the flexed hip joint during lateral trochanteric loading , 2005, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[15]  Sion Glyn-Jones,et al.  Non-invasive imaging of cartilage in early osteoarthritis. , 2013, The bone & joint journal.

[16]  K. Siebenrock,et al.  Delayed gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of hip joint cartilage: pearls and pitfalls , 2011, Orthopedic reviews.

[17]  Takayuki Obata,et al.  T2 mapping of hip articular cartilage in healthy volunteers at 3T: A study of topographic variation , 2007, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[18]  R. Ganz,et al.  Hip morphology influences the pattern of damage to the acetabular cartilage: femoroacetabular impingement as a cause of early osteoarthritis of the hip. , 2005, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[19]  Y. Yamashita,et al.  Detecting ICRS grade 1 cartilage lesions in anterior cruciate ligament injury using T1ρ and T2 mapping. , 2013, European journal of radiology.

[20]  C. Guanche,et al.  A geographic zone method to describe intra-articular pathology in hip arthroscopy: cadaveric study and preliminary report. , 2008, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[21]  K. Siebenrock,et al.  Reproducibility of dGEMRIC in assessment of hip joint cartilage: A prospective study , 2009, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[22]  A. van Kampen,et al.  The validation of the visual analogue scale for patient satisfaction after total hip arthroplasty , 2012, European orthopaedics and traumatology.

[23]  J. Hodler,et al.  The contour of the femoral head-neck junction as a predictor for the risk of anterior impingement. , 2002, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[24]  R. Lanzman,et al.  Assessment of early cartilage degeneration after slipped capital femoral epiphysis using T2 and T2* mapping , 2011, Acta radiologica.

[25]  Nobuhiko Sugano,et al.  Loaded cartilage T2 mapping in patients with hip dysplasia. , 2010, Radiology.