Limitations of Hyperspectral Earth Observation on Small Satellites

Small satellites offer the means for a consolidated strategy for fast, economical access to space. Their role in na tional and regional programs is of great value in today’s world, as they provide affordable means to obtain remote sensing data. This has proven to be especially useful for developing countries, many of which encompass large and remote expanses of territory. The high degree of development of small satellite technology facilitates increasing capabilities of onboard Earth Observation (EO) sensors. With missions already operating in the high resolution range (< 5 m) and several spectral bands, the performance of these sensors will be soon limited by the laws of physics. Newly envisaged small satellite missions include plans for an increasingly high number of bands – reaching up to hundreds of them – while maintaining good spatial resolution. This imposes a challenge in the coverage, the spatial resolution, and the quality of the data that can be obtained with these systems. In this paper, we analyze the restrictions facing hyperspectral sensors on small platforms caused by the limited volume and power available. The constraints imposed by the physics of optics on the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and the modulation transfer function (MTF) are also described, as well as the problems arising from the large amounts of data generated by such missions.

[1]  Gerald C. Holst,et al.  CMOS/CCD sensors and camera systems , 2007 .

[2]  Rainer Sandau System considerations and potential for topographic mapping with small satellites , 2009 .

[3]  Enrico Magli,et al.  Optimized onboard lossless and near-lossless compression of hyperspectral data using CALIC , 2004, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[4]  John Shepanski,et al.  Hyperion, a space-based imaging spectrometer , 2003, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[5]  Rainer Sandau Potential and shortcoming of small satellite for topographic mapping , 2006 .

[6]  Ruiliang Pu,et al.  Advances in Environmental Remote Sensing : Sensors, Algorithms, and Applications , 2011 .

[7]  John R. Schott,et al.  Remote Sensing: The Image Chain Approach , 1996 .

[8]  John F. Arnold,et al.  The lossless compression of AVIRIS images by vector quantization , 1997, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[9]  Rainer Sandau,et al.  Small Satellite Missions for Earth Observation - New Developments and Trends , 2010 .

[10]  J. S. Mackay Space mission analysis. , 1968 .

[11]  James R. Wertz,et al.  Space Mission Analysis and Design , 1992 .

[12]  Moshe Guelman,et al.  Small satellite's role in future hyperspectral Earth observation missions , 2006 .

[13]  Glenn D. Boreman,et al.  Modulation Transfer Function in Optical and Electro-Optical Systems , 2001 .

[14]  G. Boreman Modulation Transfer Function , 1998 .

[15]  Nikolay N. Ponomarenko,et al.  An automatic approach to lossy compression of AVIRIS images , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium.

[16]  Qihao Weng,et al.  Taylor & Francis Series in Remote Sensing Applications , 2014 .