Imaging-guided prostate biopsy: conventional and emerging techniques.

Transrectal ultrasonography (US)-guided biopsy is the standard approach for histopathologic diagnosis of prostate cancer. However, this technique has multiple limitations owing to the operator's inability in most cases to directly visualize and target prostate lesions. Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of the prostate overcomes many of these limitations by directly depicting areas of abnormality and allowing targeted biopsies. Accuracy in the detection of prostate cancer is improved by the combined use of standard T2-weighted MR imaging and advanced MR imaging techniques such as diffusion-weighted imaging, dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging, and MR spectroscopy. Suspicious-appearing regions of the prostate seen on MR images can be targeted at real-time transrectal US-guided biopsy to improve the diagnostic yield. MR imaging also can be performed for real-time guidance of transrectal prostate biopsy. Studies among patients who underwent at least one transrectal US-guided biopsy with a negative result before undergoing an MR imaging-guided biopsy showed improved detection rates with MR imaging-guided biopsy in comparison with the detection rates achieved with a repeat transrectal US-guided biopsy; however, MR imaging-guided biopsy is a more time-consuming procedure. A technique known as fused MR imaging- and transrectal US-guided biopsy, which relies on the coregistration of previously acquired MR images with real-time transrectal US images acquired during the procedure, shows promise but is limited by deformation of the prostate; this limitation is the subject of ongoing investigation. Another technique that is currently under investigation, MR imaging-guided prostate biopsy with robotic assistance, may one day help improve the accuracy of biopsy needle placement.

[1]  A. D'Amico,et al.  NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer. , 2010, Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN.

[2]  Jocelyne Troccaz,et al.  MRI/TRUS data fusion for prostate brachytherapy. Preliminary results , 2004, Medical physics.

[3]  Anthony D'Amico,et al.  Prostate cancer. Clinical practice guidelines in oncology. , 2007, Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN.

[4]  Alexandre Mamedov,et al.  Clinical results of long-term follow-up of a large, active surveillance cohort with localized prostate cancer. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[5]  M. Terris,et al.  Random systematic versus directed ultrasound guided transrectal core biopsies of the prostate. , 1989, The Journal of urology.

[6]  Fernando J. Kim,et al.  Is apparent diffusion coefficient associated with clinical risk scores for prostate cancers that are visible on 3-T MR images? , 2011 .

[7]  Ralph Strecker,et al.  Areas suspicious for prostate cancer: MR-guided biopsy in patients with at least one transrectal US-guided biopsy with a negative finding--multiparametric MR imaging for detection and biopsy planning. , 2011, Radiology.

[8]  G Bartsch,et al.  Comparison of contrast enhanced color Doppler targeted biopsy to conventional systematic biopsy: impact on Gleason score. , 2007, The Journal of urology.

[9]  A. Thompson,et al.  MRI in the detection of prostate cancer: combined apparent diffusion coefficient, metabolite ratio, and vascular parameters. , 2009, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[10]  Sheng Xu,et al.  Closed-Loop Control in Fused MR-TRUS Image-Guided Prostate Biopsy , 2007, MICCAI.

[11]  M. Bock,et al.  INNOMOTION for Percutaneous Image-Guided Interventions , 2008, IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine.

[12]  Peter C Albertsen,et al.  The unintended burden of increased prostate cancer detection associated with prostate cancer screening and diagnosis. , 2010, Urology.

[13]  Matthew R Cooperberg,et al.  Time trends and local variation in primary treatment of localized prostate cancer. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[14]  Baris Turkbey,et al.  Is apparent diffusion coefficient associated with clinical risk scores for prostate cancers that are visible on 3-T MR images? , 2011, Radiology.

[15]  C. N. Coleman,et al.  Transrectal prostate biopsy and fiducial marker placement in a standard 1.5T magnetic resonance imaging scanner. , 2006, The Journal of urology.

[16]  Ian Young,et al.  A MR Compatible Mechatronic System to Facilitate Magic Angle Experiments in Vivo , 2007, MICCAI.

[17]  Gabor Fichtinger,et al.  Design of a novel MRI compatible manipulator for image guided prostate interventions , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[18]  Ivan Bricault,et al.  CT and MR Compatible Light Puncture Robot: Architectural Design and First Experiments , 2004, MICCAI.

[19]  Katarzyna J Macura,et al.  MR-guided biopsy of the prostate: an overview of techniques and a systematic review. , 2008, European urology.

[20]  James A Eastham,et al.  Pathological upgrading and up staging with immediate repeat biopsy in patients eligible for active surveillance. , 2008, The Journal of urology.

[21]  Hongen Liao,et al.  Ultrasonic motor driving method for EMI-free image in MR image-guided surgical robotic system , 2007, 2007 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[22]  A. Hemal,et al.  Transrectal ultrasound‐guided biopsy of prostate voxels identified as suspicious of malignancy on three‐dimensional 1H MR spectroscopic imaging in patients with abnormal digital rectal examination or raised prostate specific antigen level of 4–10 ng/ml , 2007, NMR in biomedicine.

[23]  W. Horninger,et al.  Contrast‐enhanced ultrasonography using cadence‐contrast pulse sequencing technology for targeted biopsy of the prostate , 2009, BJU international.

[24]  R. Gassert,et al.  MRI/fMRI-compatible robotic system with force feedback for interaction with human motion , 2006, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[25]  Thomas Hambrock,et al.  Thirty-Two-Channel Coil 3T Magnetic Resonance-Guided Biopsies of Prostate Tumor Suspicious Regions Identified on Multimodality 3T Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Technique and Feasibility , 2008, Investigative radiology.

[26]  A. Evans,et al.  ‘Prostatic evasive anterior tumours’: the role of magnetic resonance imaging , 2010, BJU international.

[27]  A. Fergany,et al.  A technique of transrectal ultrasound guided transperineal random prostate biopsy in patients with ulcerative colitis and an ileal pouch. , 2000, The Journal of urology.

[28]  G. Durkan,et al.  Improving prostate cancer detection with an extended‐core transrectal ultrasonography‐guided prostate biopsy protocol , 2002 .

[29]  M Bolla,et al.  EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. , 2001, European urology.

[30]  C. Olsson,et al.  Transperineal prostate needle biopsy guided by transurethral ultrasound in patients without a rectum. , 1996, Urology.

[31]  K. Shinohara,et al.  The optimal systematic prostate biopsy scheme should include 8 rather than 6 biopsies: results of a prospective clinical trial. , 2000, The Journal of urology.

[32]  J. Pilcher,et al.  The role of transrectal ultrasound and biopsy in the diagnosis and management of prostate cancer , 2008 .

[33]  Thomas J. Vogl,et al.  MR-compatible assistance system for punction in a high-field system: device and feasibility of transgluteal biopsies of the prostate gland , 2007, European Radiology.

[34]  Bernd Hamm,et al.  Patients with a history of elevated prostate-specific antigen levels and negative transrectal US-guided quadrant or sextant biopsy results: value of MR imaging. , 2002, Radiology.

[35]  G. Bartsch,et al.  Sonoelastography of the prostate: comparison with systematic biopsy findings in 492 patients. , 2008, European journal of radiology.

[36]  J. Machan,et al.  Diffusion-weighted MRI of peripheral zone prostate cancer: comparison of tumor apparent diffusion coefficient with Gleason score and percentage of tumor on core biopsy. , 2010, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[37]  P. Choyke,et al.  Real-time MRI-TRUS fusion for guidance of targeted prostate biopsies , 2008, Computer aided surgery : official journal of the International Society for Computer Aided Surgery.

[38]  M. Terris,et al.  Critical evaluation of the current indications for transition zone biopsies. , 2001, Urology.

[39]  Jocelyne Troccaz,et al.  Automated segmentation of the prostate in 3D MR images using a probabilistic atlas and a spatially constrained deformable model. , 2010, Medical physics.

[40]  U. Patel,et al.  Current status of transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy in the diagnosis of prostate cancer. , 2006, Clinical radiology.

[41]  Pierre Hellier,et al.  Level Set Methods in an EM Framework for Shape Classification and Estimation , 2004, International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention.

[42]  Thomas Hambrock,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging guided prostate biopsy in men with repeat negative biopsies and increased prostate specific antigen. , 2010, The Journal of urology.

[43]  A. Patriciu,et al.  A New Type of Motor: Pneumatic Step Motor , 2007, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[44]  A. Henderson,et al.  Extensive transperineal template biopsies of prostate: modified technique and results. , 2006, Urology.

[45]  Neil Fleshner,et al.  The role of magnetic resonance imaging in targeting prostate cancer in patients with previous negative biopsies and elevated prostate‐specific antigen levels , 2009, BJU international.

[46]  F. Remzi,et al.  Screening and Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer in Patients with Ileal Pouch–Anal Anastomosis: Consensus From an Expert Panel , 2011, The American Journal of Gastroenterology.

[47]  L. Bégin,et al.  Value of systematic transition zone biopsies in the early detection of prostate cancer. , 1996, The Journal of urology.

[48]  Lennart Franzén,et al.  How well does the Gleason score predict prostate cancer death? A 20-year followup of a population based cohort in Sweden. , 2006, The Journal of urology.

[49]  S. Zangos,et al.  MR-guided transgluteal biopsies with an open low-field system in patients with clinically suspected prostate cancer: technique and preliminary results , 2004, European Radiology.

[50]  I. Kaplan,et al.  Real time MRI-ultrasound image guided stereotactic prostate biopsy. , 2002, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[51]  D. Beyersdorff,et al.  MR imaging-guided prostate biopsy with a closed MR unit at 1.5 T: initial results. , 2005, Radiology.

[52]  T. Schlomm,et al.  Evaluation of prostate cancer detection with ultrasound real-time elastography: a comparison with step section pathological analysis after radical prostatectomy. , 2008, European urology.

[53]  Gabor Fichtinger,et al.  Patient selection determines the prostate cancer yield of dynamic contrast‐enhanced magnetic resonance imaging‐guided transrectal biopsies in a closed 3‐Tesla scanner , 2007, BJU international.

[54]  A. D'Amico,et al.  Transperineal magnetic resonance image guided prostate biopsy. , 2000, The Journal of urology.

[55]  B. S. Sidhu,et al.  Real-time elastography in the detection of prostate cancer in patients with raised PSA level. , 2011, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[56]  I. Floriani,et al.  Endorectal and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for detection of local recurrence after radical prostatectomy. , 2008, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[57]  Helmut Ermert,et al.  Initial experiences with real-time elastography guided biopsies of the prostate. , 2005, The Journal of urology.

[58]  M. Terris,et al.  Transperineal prostate biopsy after abdominoperineal resection. , 2003, The Journal of urology.

[59]  Branislav Jaramaz,et al.  Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention – MICCAI 2000 , 2000, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[60]  Namkug Kim,et al.  Functional MR imaging of prostate cancer. , 2007, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[61]  Aaron Fenster,et al.  Clinical application of a 3D ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy system. , 2011, Urologic oncology.

[62]  Michael McCormack,et al.  Development and internal validation of a nomogram predicting the probability of prostate cancer Gleason sum upgrading between biopsy and radical prostatectomy pathology. , 2006 .

[63]  Derya Yakar,et al.  Magnetic Resonance-Guided Biopsy of the Prostate: Feasibility, Technique, and Clinical Applications , 2008, Topics in magnetic resonance imaging : TMRI.

[64]  Georg Bartsch,et al.  Comparison of contrast enhanced color Doppler targeted biopsy with conventional systematic biopsy: impact on prostate cancer detection. , 2002, The Journal of urology.

[65]  Alexandru Patriciu,et al.  “MRI Stealth” robot for prostate interventions , 2007, Minimally invasive therapy & allied technologies : MITAT : official journal of the Society for Minimally Invasive Therapy.

[66]  Peter Guion,et al.  Initial clinical experience with real‐time transrectal ultrasonography‐magnetic resonance imaging fusion‐guided prostate biopsy , 2008, BJU international.

[67]  J. Crowley,et al.  Prevalence of prostate cancer among men with a prostate-specific antigen level < or =4.0 ng per milliliter. , 2004, The New England journal of medicine.

[68]  Ashutosh Kumar Singh,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging‐directed transrectal ultrasonography‐guided biopsies in patients at risk of prostate cancer , 2007, BJU international.

[69]  Nobuhiko Hata,et al.  MR Compatible Surgical Assist Robot: System Integration and Preliminary Feasibility Study , 2000, MICCAI.

[70]  P. Hahn,et al.  Prostate biopsy after ano-rectal resection: value of CT-guided trans-gluteal biopsy , 2008, European Radiology.

[71]  Thomas Wiegel,et al.  EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. Part 1: screening, diagnosis, and treatment of clinically localised disease. , 2011, European urology.

[72]  A. Jemal,et al.  Cancer Statistics, 2010 , 2010, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[73]  Jocelyne Troccaz,et al.  Prostate Biopsy Assistance System with Gland Deformation Estimation for Enhanced Precision , 2009, MICCAI.

[74]  L. Klotz,et al.  Prostate cancer screening: Canadian guidelines 2011. , 2011, Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada.

[75]  B. Kiefer,et al.  Prostate biopsy in the supine position in a standard 1.5-T scanner under real time MR-imaging control using a MR-compatible endorectal biopsy device , 2006, European Radiology.

[76]  Paul R Young,et al.  Systematic transperineal ultrasound-guided template biopsy of the prostate: three-year experience. , 2005, Urology.

[77]  Andras Lasso,et al.  MRI-Guided Robotic Prostate Biopsy: A Clinical Accuracy Validation , 2010, MICCAI.

[78]  Ralph Strecker,et al.  Areas Suspicious for Prostate Cancer : MR – guided Biopsy in Patients with at Least One Transrectal US-guided Biopsy with a Negative Finding — Multiparametric MR Imaging for Detection and Biopsy Planning 1 , 2011 .

[79]  A. D'Amico,et al.  MR imaging-guided prostate biopsy with surgical navigation software: device validation and feasibility. , 2001, Radiology.

[80]  S. Bott,et al.  Anterior prostate cancer: is it more difficult to diagnose? , 2002, BJU international.

[81]  Katsuyoshi Ito,et al.  Apparent diffusion coefficient values in peripheral and transition zones of the prostate: Comparison between normal and malignant prostatic tissues and correlation with histologic grade , 2008, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[82]  L. Pallwein,et al.  Value of real-time elastography targeted biopsy for prostate cancer detection in men with prostate specific antigen 1.25 ng/ml or greater and 4.00 ng/ml or less. , 2010, The Journal of urology.

[83]  S. Zangos,et al.  MR-compatible Assistance System for Biopsy in a High-Field-Strength System: Initial Results in Patients with Suspicious Prostate Lesions 1 , 2022 .

[84]  Pär Stattin,et al.  Outcomes in Localized Prostate Cancer: National Prostate Cancer Register of Sweden Follow-up Study , 2010, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[85]  高嶋 力弥 Anterior distribution of stage T1c nonpalpable tumors in radical prostatectomy specimens , 2002 .

[86]  S. Palazzo,et al.  Role of imaging and biopsy to assess local recurrence after definitive treatment for prostate carcinoma (surgery, radiotherapy, cryotherapy, HIFU) , 2011, World Journal of Urology.

[87]  Thomas Hambrock,et al.  Feasibility of 3T Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance-Guided Biopsy in Localizing Local Recurrence of Prostate Cancer After External Beam Radiation Therapy , 2010, Investigative radiology.

[88]  Heinz-Peter Schlemmer,et al.  MRI-guided biopsy of the prostate increases diagnostic performance in men with elevated or increasing PSA levels after previous negative TRUS biopsies. , 2006, European urology.

[89]  E. Halpern,et al.  Enhanced transrectal ultrasound modalities in the diagnosis of prostate cancer. , 2010, Urology.