A Lower Extremity Physical Function Computerized Adaptive Testing Instrument for Orthopaedic Patients

Background: The aim of this study was to develop a lower extremity (LE) physical function computerized adaptive testing (CAT) instrument based on Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) physical function items. Methods The PROMIS physical function item bank was administered to adult outpatient orthopaedic patients. Three hundred eighty-two patients presenting with LE disorders were analyzed using item response theory modeling. A LE physical function item bank was developed by distilling relevant and psychometrically sound items from the full PROMIS physical function bank. Real data CAT simulations were conducted to examine specifications for a live CAT. Results The LE physical function item bank was sufficiently unidimensional and free of item bias. It demonstrated high reliability along with content and construct validity. The flexible length LE CAT was highly correlated with the full LE instrument and showed uniformly high precision across the entire measurement continuum. The average CAT length was 6 to 7 items when standard error of measurement was 0.3 or less. Conclusion This LE physical function CAT is a valid, reliable and feasible physical function assessment tool for orthopaedic patients with LE problems that has the potential to reduce patient burden as well as administrative costs associated with data collection.

[1]  C. Saltzman,et al.  Evaluation of the PROMIS physical function item bank in orthopaedic patients , 2011, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[2]  Otto B. Walter,et al.  An evaluation of patient-reported outcomes found computerized adaptive testing was efficient in assessing stress perception. , 2009, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[3]  Alan M Jette,et al.  Creating a computer adaptive test version of the late-life function and disability instrument. , 2008, The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences.

[4]  M Rose,et al.  Evaluation of a preliminary physical function item bank supported the expected advantages of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS). , 2008, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[5]  Bruno D. Zumbo,et al.  Three Generations of DIF Analyses: Considering Where It Has Been, Where It Is Now, and Where It Is Going , 2007 .

[6]  R. Fitzpatrick,et al.  Impact of patient-reported outcome measures on routine practice: a structured review. , 2006, Journal of evaluation in clinical practice.

[7]  Otto B. Walter,et al.  Development of a Computer-adaptive Test for Depression (D-CAT) , 2005, Quality of Life Research.

[8]  G. Gage Kingsbury,et al.  Assessing the Utility of Item Response Models: Computerized Adaptive Testing. , 2005 .

[9]  K. Cook,et al.  Dynamic assessment of health outcomes: time to let the CAT out of the bag? , 2005, Health services research.

[10]  P. Stratford,et al.  Simulated computerized adaptive tests for measuring functional status were efficient with good discriminant validity in patients with hip, knee, or foot/ankle impairments. , 2005, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[11]  D. Weiss Computerized Adaptive Testing for Effective and Efficient Measurement in Counseling and Education , 2004 .

[12]  C. McHorney Ten Recommendations for Advancing Patient-Centered Outcomes Measurement for Older Persons , 2003, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[13]  H. Wainer Computerized adaptive testing: A primer, 2nd ed. , 2000 .

[14]  Eastwood Ea Functional status and its uses in rehabilitation medicine. , 1999 .

[15]  J. Lai,et al.  The use of Rasch analysis to produce scale-free measurement of functional ability. , 1999, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[16]  M J Buxton,et al.  Evaluating patient-based outcome measures for use in clinical trials. , 1998, Health technology assessment.

[17]  David J. Weiss,et al.  Improving Measurement Quality and Efficiency with Adaptive Testing , 1982 .

[18]  F. Samejima Estimation of latent ability using a response pattern of graded scores , 1968 .