Limitations of the SCORE-guided European guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention

Recently, primary prevention with statins was liberalized in the USA and UK but restricted in many comparable European countries. Supported by risk-benefit and cost-effectiveness analyses, the 2013 ACC/AHA (American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association)1 and 2014 UK-NICE (National Institute for Health and Care Excellence)2 risk assessment and prevention guidelines lowered the risk threshold above which primary prevention with statins should be considered. In contrast, the 2016 update of the European guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice,3 issued jointly by the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and nine other societies, continued a conservative position on statin use in primary prevention by preserving the high-risk decision threshold introduced in 2003: 5% 10-year risk for fatal atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) estimated by SCORE (Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation).4 The 5% high-risk threshold introduced by the SCORE-based 2003 ESC prevention guidelines4 was chosen because 5% 10-year risk for fatal ASCVD was considered to equate with 20% 10-year risk for fatal and non-fatal coronary heart disease (CHD) arbitrarily defined as high-risk under previous ESC guidelines. No rationale was provided for choosing ≥20% 10-year CHD risk as high risk when introduced in 1994,5 neither for preserving it as ≥5% 10-year risk for fatal ASCVD.4 Hence, except for UK and possibly a few other European countries, the most important threshold for initiating primary prevention with statins has not been revised in Europe for more than 20 years, during which time long-awaited generic and inexpensive statins became available, and their efficacy and safety convincingly documented. Considering that the prevalence and treatment costs of ASCVD remain high, such a development would normally favour a more widespread use of statins in primary prevention. However, because SCORE depends solely on the ultimate cause of death, in countries with declining ASCVD mortality it is becoming harder …

[1]  E. Falk,et al.  ACC/AHA guidelines superior to ESC/EAS guidelines for primary prevention with statins in non-diabetic Europeans: the Copenhagen General Population Study , 2016, European heart journal.

[2]  E. Falk,et al.  The high-density lipoprotein-adjusted SCORE model worsens SCORE-based risk classification in a contemporary population of 30 824 Europeans: the Copenhagen General Population Study , 2015, European heart journal.

[3]  G. Jensen,et al.  Increasing prevalence despite decreasing incidence of ischaemic heart disease and myocardial infarction. A national register based perspective in Denmark, 1980–2009 , 2015, European journal of preventive cardiology.

[4]  E. Falk,et al.  Real-life evaluation of European and American high-risk strategies for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in patients with first myocardial infarction , 2014, BMJ Open.

[5]  Jennifer G. Robinson,et al.  2013 ACC/AHA guideline on the treatment of blood cholesterol to reduce atherosclerotic cardiovascular risk in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. , 2014, Circulation.

[6]  Shah Ebrahim,et al.  [European Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice (version 2012)]. , 2013, Turk Kardiyoloji Dernegi arsivi : Turk Kardiyoloji Derneginin yayin organidir.

[7]  Shah Ebrahim,et al.  European Guidelines on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice (Version 2012) , 2012, International Journal of Behavioral Medicine.

[8]  I. Graham,et al.  Value and limitations of existing scores for the assessment of cardiovascular risk: a review for clinicians. , 2009, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[9]  J. Robson,et al.  Lipid modification: cardiovascular risk assessment and the modification of blood lipids for the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease , 2007, Heart.

[10]  Shah Ebrahim,et al.  JOINT ESC GUIDELINES 2016 European Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice – Web Addenda , 2016 .

[11]  Shah Ebrahim,et al.  European guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice. Third Joint Task Force of European and Other Societies on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice. , 2003 .

[12]  H. Tunstall-Pedoe,et al.  Estimation of ten-year risk of fatal cardiovascular disease in Europe: the SCORE project. , 2003, European heart journal.

[13]  R. D'Agostino,et al.  Validation of the Framingham coronary heart disease prediction scores: results of a multiple ethnic groups investigation. , 2001, JAMA.

[14]  Daniel Levy,et al.  Accuracy of Death Certificates for Coding Coronary Heart Disease as the Cause of Death , 1998, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[15]  P. Poole‐Wilson,et al.  Prevention of coronary heart disease in clinical practice. Recommendations of the Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology, European Atherosclerosis Society and European Society of Hypertension. , 1994, European heart journal.

[16]  P. Poole‐Wilson,et al.  Prevention of coronary heart disease in clinical practice , 1994 .

[17]  A. Hoes,et al.  2016 European Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice. , 2016, Revista espanola de cardiologia.

[18]  Jennifer G. Robinson,et al.  Reprint: 2013 ACC/AHA Guideline on the Treatment of Blood Cholesterol to Reduce Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Risk in Adults. , 2013, Journal of the American Pharmacists Association : JAPhA.

[19]  G. De Backer,et al.  Predictive ability of the SCORE Belgium risk chart for cardiovascular mortality. , 2010, International journal of cardiology.