Strategic planning for sustainable heating in cities: A morphological method for scenario development and selection

The transition to more sustainable heating systems requires socio-technical approaches to strategic planning. Scenario development plays a key role in strategic planning, as the process supports the development of future visions and actions required for their realisation. However, new approaches to scenario development are required to address the limitations of conventional scenario development methods, such as the cognitive barriers of ‘groupthink’, reluctance to consider ‘outside-the-box’ options, handling of complexity, and ad hoc scenario selection and general non-transparency of scenario development processes. This paper describes the development and implementation of a novel method for scenario development and selection in the context of participatory strategic planning for sustainable heating in cities. The method is based on the morphological approach and a number of scenario criteria including transparency, reliability, coverage, completeness, relevance/density, creativity, interpretability, consistency, differentiation and plausibility. It integrates creativity workshops and interdisciplinary stakeholder participation to enhance the ownership and legitimacy of the scenarios. The approach entails the generation of a complete space of scenarios for heating systems and reduction of this space using cross-consistency analysis and project-specific requirements. Iterative development and implementation of the method is illustrated using two participatory backcasting projects focused on strategic planning for providing a comfortable indoor climate for Bila Tserkva, Ukraine, and Nis, Serbia by the year 2030. The results demonstrate that the method helps overcome the limitations of conventional approaches to scenario development and supports rigorous and transparent selection of a scenario set for participatory analysis. The method fostered the elicitation of consensus-based scenarios for more sustainable heating systems in both cities with regard to the quality of indoor comfort, environmental impact, resource efficiency and energy security.

[1]  Poul Erik Grohnheit,et al.  Competition in the market for space heating. District heating as the infrastructure for competition among fuels and technologies , 2003 .

[2]  D. Hawkey,et al.  Organisation and Governance of Urban Energy Systems: District Heating and Cooling in the UK , 2013 .

[3]  Kristina Orehounig,et al.  Integration of decentralized energy systems in neighbourhoods using the energy hub approach , 2015 .

[4]  Jonathan Rutherford.  Unbundling Stockholm: The networks, planning and social welfare nexus beyond the unitary city , 2008 .

[5]  George Wright,et al.  The origins and evolution of scenario techniques in long range business planning , 2005 .

[6]  Johan Grievink,et al.  Integrated conceptual design of a robust and reliable waste-heat district heating system , 2007 .

[7]  Ray Galvin,et al.  Targeting ‘behavers’ rather than behaviours: A ‘subject-oriented’ approach for reducing space heating rebound effects in low energy dwellings , 2013 .

[8]  Jan-Olof Dalenbäck,et al.  Potential of residential buildings as thermal energy storage in district heating systems – Results from a pilot test , 2015 .

[9]  R. Schmidt,et al.  15 – Development of district heating and cooling in the urban planning context , 2016 .

[10]  Adrian Smith,et al.  Designing long-term policy: rethinking transition management , 2009 .

[11]  Sven Werner,et al.  Heat load patterns in district heating substations , 2013 .

[12]  H. Rohracher,et al.  Conflicting strategies towards sustainable heating at an urban junction of heat infrastructure and building standards , 2015 .

[13]  Brian Vad Mathiesen,et al.  4th Generation District Heating (4GDH) Integrating smart thermal grids into future sustainable energy systems , 2014 .

[14]  Lisa Branchini,et al.  Smart District Heating: Distributed Generation Systems’ Effects on the Network , 2015 .

[15]  Muhammad Amer,et al.  A review of scenario planning , 2013 .

[16]  Dagnija Blumberga,et al.  The future competitiveness of the non-Emissions Trading Scheme district heating systems in the Baltic States , 2016 .

[17]  K. Youcef-Toumi,et al.  Real-time economic dispatch for the supply side of the energy-water nexus , 2014 .

[18]  F. Geels.  From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems: Insights about dynamics and change from sociology and institutional theory , 2004 .

[19]  Dejan Ivezić,et al.  Exploring scenarios for more sustainable heating: The case of Niš, Serbia , 2016 .

[20]  J. Grin,et al.  Transitions to Sustainable Development: New Directions in the Study of Long Term Transformative Change , 2010 .

[21]  P. Partidário,et al.  Planning of strategic innovation aimed at environmental sustainability: actor-networks, scenario acceptance and backcasting analysis within a polymeric coating chain , 2002 .

[22]  Francesco Calise,et al.  Solar heating and cooling systems by CPVT and ET solar collectors: A novel transient simulation model , 2013 .

[23]  K. Sperling,et al.  Centralisation and decentralisation in strategic municipal energy planning in Denmark , 2011 .

[24]  Bernd Möller,et al.  End-use energy savings and district heating expansion in a local renewable energy system: A short-term perspective , 2012 .

[25]  B. Truffer,et al.  Local strategic planning processes and sustainability transitions in infrastructure sectors , 2010 .

[26]  D. Loorbach.  Transition management for sustainable development: A prescriptive, complexity-based governance framework , 2010 .

[27]  Benjamin P. Bryant,et al.  Thinking Inside the Box , 2010 .

[28]  Frank W. Geels,et al.  Dynamics in socio-technical systems : typology of change processes and contrasting case studies , 2007 .

[29]  Michel Godet,et al.  Creating Futures: Scenario Planning as a Strategic Management Tool , 2001 .

[30]  Paris A. Fokaides,et al.  European smart cities: The role of zero energy buildings , 2015 .

[31]  Marc A. Rosen,et al.  District heating and cooling: Review of technology and potential enhancements , 2012 .

[32]  John Holmberg,et al.  Backcasting — a framework for strategic planning , 2000 .

[33]  Henrik Lund,et al.  A renewable energy system in Frederikshavn using low-temperature geothermal energy for district heating , 2011 .

[34]  Magnus Åberg,et al.  Investigating the impact of heat demand reductions on Swedish district heating production using a set of typical system models , 2014 .

[35]  Kristina Holmgren,et al.  Role of a district-heating network as a user of waste-heat supply from various sources : the case of Göteborg , 2006 .

[36]  T. Ritchey,et al.  Problem structuring using computer-aided morphological analysis , 2006, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[37]  F. Zwicky.  Discovery, Invention, Research through the morphological approach , 1969 .

[38]  Philip J. Vergragt,et al.  The impact and spin-off of participatory backcasting: From vision to niche , 2011 .

[39]  Ron Bradfield.  Cognitive Barriers in the Scenario Development Process , 2008 .

[40]  Timothy J. Foxon,et al.  Infrastructure transformation as a socio-technical process — Implications for the governance of energy distribution networks in the UK , 2015 .

[41]  John Ratcliffe,et al.  Scenario building: a suitable method for strategic property planning? , 2000 .

[42]  Gregory C. Unruh.  Understanding carbon lock-in , 2000 .

[43]  Leif Gustavsson,et al.  Cost and primary energy efficiency of small-scale district heating systems , 2014 .

[44]  Anne Grete Hestnes,et al.  Heat supply to low-energy buildings in district heating areas Analyses of CO2 emissions and electricity supply security , 2008 .

[45]  M. Godet,et al.  Creating the future: The use and misuse of scenarios , 1996 .

[46]  F. Geels,et al.  The dynamics of transitions: a socio-technical perspective , 2010 .

[47]  Patrick Lauenburg,et al.  Smart district heating networks – A simulation study of prosumers’ impact on technical parameters in distribution networks , 2014 .

[48]  Jochen Markard,et al.  Innovation processes in large technical systems: Market liberalization as a driver for radical change? , 2006 .

[49]  Pauline Gabillet,et al.  Energy supply and urban planning projects: Analysing tensions around district heating provision in a French eco-district , 2015 .

[50]  P.W.G. Groot Koerkamp,et al.  Assessing the impact of changes in the electricity price structure on dairy farm energy costs , 2015 .

[51]  George Cairns,et al.  Does the intuitive logics method – and its recent enhancements – produce “effective” scenarios? , 2013 .