Extending Förster resonance energy transfer measurements beyond 100 Å using common organic fluorophores: enhanced transfer in the presence of multiple acceptors.

Using commercially available organic fluorophores, the current applications of Förster (fluorescence) resonance energy transfer (FRET) are limited to about 80 Å. However, many essential activities in cells are spatially and/or temporally dependent on the assembly/disassembly of transient complexes consisting of large-size macromolecules that are frequently separated by distances greater than 100 Å. Expanding the accessible range for FRET to 150 Å would open up many cellular interactions to fluorescence and fluorescence-lifetime imaging. Here, we demonstrate that the use of multiple randomly distributed acceptors on proteins/antibodies, rather than the use of a single localized acceptor, makes it possible to significantly enhance FRET and detect interactions between the donor fluorophore and the acceptor-labeled protein at distances greater than 100 Å. A simple theoretical model for spherical bodies that have been randomly labeled with acceptors has been developed. To test the theoretical predictions of this system, we carried out FRET studies using a 30-mer oligonucleotide-avidin system that was labeled with the acceptors DyLight649 or Dylight750. The opposite 5'-end of the oligonucleotide was labeled with the Alexa568 donor. We observed significantly enhanced energy transfer due to presence of multiple acceptors on the avidin protein. The results and simulation indicate that use of a nanosized body that has been randomly labeled with multiple acceptors allows FRET measurements to be extended to over 150 Å when using commercially available probes and established protein-labeling protocols.

[1]  A. Luini,et al.  Passage through the Golgi. , 2010, Current opinion in cell biology.

[2]  N. Hildebrandt,et al.  Lanthanide Complexes and Quantum Dots: A Bright Wedding for Resonance Energy Transfer , 2008 .

[3]  J. Kuśba,et al.  Effects of metallic silver island films on resonance energy transfer between N,N'-(dipropyl)-tetramethyl- indocarbocyanine (Cy3)- and N,N'-(dipropyl)-tetramethyl- indodicarbocyanine (Cy5)-labeled DNA. , 2003, Biopolymers.

[4]  V. Raicu Efficiency of Resonance Energy Transfer in Homo-Oligomeric Complexes of Proteins , 2007, Journal of biological physics.

[5]  Paul R Selvin,et al.  Principles and biophysical applications of lanthanide-based probes. , 2002, Annual review of biophysics and biomolecular structure.

[6]  A. Blumen,et al.  On the concentration and time dependence of the energy transfer to randomly distributed acceptors , 1979 .

[7]  T. Heyduk,et al.  Conformational Changes of DNA Induced by Binding ofChironomus High Mobility Group Protein 1a (cHMG1a) , 1997, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[8]  S. Ameer-Beg,et al.  Fluorescence lifetime and polarization-resolved imaging in cell biology. , 2009, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[9]  J. Eisinger,et al.  The orientational freedom of molecular probes. The orientation factor in intramolecular energy transfer. , 1979, Biophysical journal.

[10]  N O Reich,et al.  Nanometal surface energy transfer in optical rulers, breaking the FRET barrier. , 2005, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[11]  Ching-Wei Chang,et al.  Physiological fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy improves Förster resonance energy transfer detection in living cells. , 2009, Journal of biomedical optics.

[12]  Igor L. Medintz,et al.  Self-assembled nanoscale biosensors based on quantum dot FRET donors , 2003, Nature materials.

[13]  Nivriti Gahlaut,et al.  Time-resolved luminescence resonance energy transfer imaging of protein–protein interactions in living cells , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[14]  M. V. D. van de Corput,et al.  Nanoparticle-induced fluorescence lifetime modification as nanoscopic ruler: demonstration at the single molecule level. , 2007, Nano letters.

[15]  Hans-Gerd Löhmannsröben,et al.  Lanthanides to quantum dots resonance energy transfer in time-resolved fluoro-immunoassays and luminescence microscopy. , 2006, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[16]  J. Wiśniewski,et al.  Conformational changes of DNA induced by binding of Chironomus high mobility group protein 1a (cHMG1a). Regions flanking an HMG1 box domain do not influence the bend angle of the DNA. , 1997, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[17]  J. Lubkowski,et al.  Intrinsic fluorescence of hemoglobins and myoglobins. , 1997, Methods in enzymology.

[18]  L. Mátyus,et al.  Strength in numbers: effects of acceptor abundance on FRET efficiency. , 2010, Chemphyschem : a European journal of chemical physics and physical chemistry.

[19]  A. Nitzan,et al.  Accelerated energy transfer between molecules near a solid particle , 1984 .

[20]  J. Klafter,et al.  Influence of restricted geometries on the direct energy transfer , 1986 .

[21]  I. Gryczynski,et al.  Nonlinear curve-fitting methods for time-resolved data analysis , 2009 .

[22]  F. Ciruela,et al.  Lighting up multiprotein complexes: lessons from GPCR oligomerization. , 2010, Trends in biotechnology.

[23]  Igor L. Medintz,et al.  Resonance Energy Transfer Between Luminescent Quantum Dots and Diverse Fluorescent Protein Acceptors. , 2009, The journal of physical chemistry. C, Nanomaterials and interfaces.

[24]  Hao Yan,et al.  Distance-dependent interactions between gold nanoparticles and fluorescent molecules with DNA as tunable spacers , 2009, Nanotechnology.

[25]  Niko Hildebrandt,et al.  Lanthanide Complexes and Quantum Dots: A Bright Wedding for Resonance Energy Transfer , 2008 .

[26]  Jian Zhang,et al.  Enhanced Förster Resonance Energy Transfer on Single Metal Particle. 2. Dependence on Donor-Acceptor Separation Distance, Particle Size, and Distance from Metal Surface. , 2007, The journal of physical chemistry. C, Nanomaterials and interfaces.

[27]  Gaudenz Danuser,et al.  FRET or no FRET: a quantitative comparison. , 2003, Biophysical journal.

[28]  Robert M. Clegg,et al.  Flim Microscopy in Biology and Medicine , 2009 .

[29]  K. Aoki,et al.  Spatiotemporal regulation of small GTPases as revealed by probes based on the principle of Förster Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET): Implications for signaling and pharmacology. , 2011, Annual review of pharmacology and toxicology.

[30]  A. Bader,et al.  Laser Scanning Confocal FLIM Microscopy , 2009 .

[31]  J E Hearst,et al.  Luminescence energy transfer using a terbium chelate: improvements on fluorescence energy transfer. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[32]  J. Lakowicz,et al.  2 – Basics of Fluorescence and FRET , 2005 .

[33]  I. Gryczynski,et al.  Chapter 12 Nonlinear Curve-Fitting Methods for Time-Resolved Data Analysis , 2009 .

[34]  R. Haugland The Handbook: A Guide to Fluorescent Probes and Labeling Technologies , 2005 .

[35]  J. Lubkowski,et al.  Time-resolved fluorescence of hemoglobin species. , 1997, Biophysical chemistry.

[36]  K. Pfleger,et al.  Recent advances in bioluminescence resonance energy transfer technologies to study GPCR heteromerization. , 2010, Current opinion in pharmacology.

[37]  L. Stryer Fluorescence energy transfer as a spectroscopic ruler. , 1978, Annual review of biochemistry.

[38]  R. Ebright,et al.  Mean DNA bend angle and distribution of DNA bend angles in the CAP-DNA complex in solution. , 2001, Journal of molecular biology.

[39]  Elizabeth A Jares-Erijman,et al.  Imaging molecular interactions in living cells by FRET microscopy. , 2006, Current opinion in chemical biology.

[40]  Frank Morgner,et al.  A quantum-dot-based molecular ruler for multiplexed optical analysis. , 2010, Angewandte Chemie.

[41]  Z. Gryczynski,et al.  Rates of energy transfer between tryptophans and hemes in hemoglobin, assuming that the heme is a planar oscillator. , 1992, Biophysical journal.