Applying uncertainty reasoning to planning sensing strategies in a robot workcell with multi-sensor capabilities

An approach to planning sensing strategies dynamically on the basis of the system's current best information about the world is described. The approach is for the system to propose a sensing operation automatically and then to determine the maximum ambiguity which might remain in the world description if that sensing operation were applied. When this maximum ambiguity is sufficiently small, the corresponding sensing operation is applied. To do this, the system formulates object hypotheses and assesses its relative belief in those hypotheses to predict what features might be observed by a proposed sensing operation. Furthermore, since the number of sensing operations available to the system can be arbitrarily large, equivalent sensing operations are grouped together using a data structure that is based on the aspect graph. In order to measure the ambiguity in a set of hypotheses, the concept of entropy from information theory is applied. This allows the determination of ambiguity in a hypothesis set in terms of the number of hypotheses and the system's distribution of belief among those hypotheses.<<ETX>>

[1]  Avinash C. Kak,et al.  Planning sensing strategies in a robot work cell with multi-sensor capabilities , 1988, Proceedings. 1988 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[2]  Richard A. Volz,et al.  Object recognition using multiple views , 1985, Proceedings. 1985 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[3]  Avinash C. Kak,et al.  Determination of the identity, position and orientation of the topmost object in a pile , 1986, Comput. Vis. Graph. Image Process..

[4]  Jitendra Malik,et al.  Computing the aspect graph for line drawings of polyhedral objects , 1988, Proceedings. 1988 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[5]  Peter Kovesi,et al.  Automatic Sensor Placement from Vision Task Requirements , 1988, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[6]  C. Ian Connolly,et al.  The determination of next best views , 1985, Proceedings. 1985 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[7]  G. Klir,et al.  MEASURES OF UNCERTAINTY AND INFORMATION BASED ON POSSIBILITY DISTRIBUTIONS , 1982 .

[8]  Thomas C. Henderson,et al.  CAGD-Based Computer Vision , 1989, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[9]  Michael S. Landy,et al.  A Statistical Viewpoint on the Theory of Evidence , 1986, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[10]  H. S. Yang,et al.  Determination of the identity, position and orientation of the topmost object in a pile: Some further experiments , 1986, Proceedings. 1986 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[11]  Glen Castore,et al.  From solid model to robot vision , 1984, ICRA.

[12]  Thomas C. Henderson,et al.  CAGD-Based Computer Vision , 1988, Defense, Security, and Sensing.

[13]  Avinash C. Kak,et al.  Modeling and calibration of a structured light scanner for 3-D robot vision , 1987, Proceedings. 1987 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.