Evaluation of improvement probability for IMRT plans

In intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) planning, the planner iteratively generates treatment plans for the patient. Upon completion of a new plan, it is critical to know the improvement potential of the plan. If the current best plan is assessed to have significant improvement potential, additional time should be spent for planning. Otherwise, the planner may decide to stop the planning process. In this research, we propose a assessment method for the improvement potential based on the threshold model (TM). The probability of improvement for the current best plan is calculated to help the planner make decisions. Numerical tests were performed on three head and neck patients and the results illustrated that the probability of improvement can be a powerful decision support tool for planners.

[1]  Richard L. Smith.  Threshold Methods for Sample Extremes , 1984 .

[2]  S. Grimshaw.  Computing Maximum Likelihood Estimates for the Generalized Pareto Distribution , 1993 .

[3]  J. V. Witter,et al.  Testing exponentiality against generalised Pareto distribution , 1985 .

[4]  Jonathan A. Tawn,et al.  Applications of Multivariate Extremes , 1994 .

[5]  Fang-Fang Yin,et al.  A planning quality evaluation tool for prostate adaptive IMRT based on machine learning. , 2011, Medical physics.

[6]  Anthony C. Davison,et al.  Modelling Excesses over High Thresholds, with an Application , 1984 .

[7]  M. A. J. Van Montfort,et al.  The generalized Pareto distribution applied to rainfall depths. , 1986 .

[8]  Vartan Choulakian,et al.  Goodness-of-Fit Tests for the Generalized Pareto Distribution , 2001, Technometrics.

[9]  P E Metcalfe,et al.  Multicentre quality assurance of intensity-modulated radiation therapy plans: a precursor to clinical trials. , 2007, Australasian radiology.

[10]  Richard L. Smith.  Maximum likelihood estimation in a class of nonregular cases , 1985 .

[11]  H. Joe.  Estimation of quantiles of the maximum of N observations , 1987 .

[12]  Avraham Eisbruch,et al.  Intensity-modulated radiation therapy: a clinical perspective. Introduction. , 2002, Seminars in radiation oncology.

[13]  J. Pickands.  Statistical Inference Using Extreme Order Statistics , 1975 .

[14]  Russell H. Taylor,et al.  Patient geometry-driven information retrieval for IMRT treatment plan quality control. , 2009, Medical physics.

[15]  Andrew Jackson,et al.  Geometric factors influencing dosimetric sparing of the parotid glands using IMRT. , 2006, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[16]  J. Hosking,et al.  Parameter and quantile estimation for the generalized pareto distribution , 1987 .

[17]  Ping Xia,et al.  Can all centers plan intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) effectively? An external audit of dosimetric comparisons between three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy and IMRT for adjuvant chemoradiation for gastric cancer. , 2008, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[18]  Richard L. Smith.  Estimating tails of probability distributions , 1987 .

[19]  H H Zhang,et al.  A surrogate-based metaheuristic global search method for beam angle selection in radiation treatment planning , 2013, Physics in medicine and biology.

[20]  Carl Scarrott,et al.  A Review of Extreme Value Threshold Estimation and Uncertainty Quantification , 2012 .

[21]  Richard L. Smith,et al.  Multivariate Threshold Methods , 1994 .

[22]  D. Low,et al.  Experience-based quality control of clinical intensity-modulated radiotherapy planning. , 2011, International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics.

[23]  Eric P. Smith,et al.  An Introduction to Statistical Modeling of Extreme Values , 2002, Technometrics.

[24]  W. DuMouchel.  Estimating the Stable Index $\alpha$ in Order to Measure Tail Thickness: A Critique , 1983 .

[25]  Margie Hunt,et al.  Choosing an intensity-modulated radiation therapy technique in the treatment of head-and-neck cancer. , 2007, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.