Age Differences in Efficiency of Reading Comprehension from Printed versus Computer-Displayed Text.

Computer technology has become a tremendous aid in examining the aging process as it relates to reading by allowing researchers to measure and control processing time. But is the computer a passive player in the study of reading and aging? Are we overlooking interactions between computers and participants using them? This study compared two types of computer presentation (investigator‐paced and self‐paced by the reader) to reading from the printed page. Older adults were most efficient in their reading comprehension when reading from the printed page, while young adults were most efficient from computer‐paced text. Although reading is a highly practiced skill for both young and old adults, the computer method of presentation is much less familiar to old adults. An overestimation of age differences with misleading findings may occur if computers are routinely used to study age differences in reading comprehension.

[1]  L L Light,et al.  Working-memory capacity, age, and memory for discourse. , 1985, Journal of gerontology.

[2]  R. Flesch The Art of Readable Writing , 1974 .

[3]  G. Seaborg,et al.  Fast Breeder Reactors , 1970 .

[4]  J. Hartley,et al.  Reader and text variables as determinants of discourse memory in adulthood. , 1986, Psychology and aging.

[5]  J. M. Vanderplas,et al.  Some Factors Affecting Legibility of Printed Materials for Older Adults. , 1980 .

[6]  Gordon E. Legge,et al.  Psychophysics of reading—II. Low vision , 1985, Vision Research.

[7]  James Hartley,et al.  Designing instructional text , 1978 .

[8]  Gillian Cohen,et al.  Language comprehension in old age , 1979, Cognitive Psychology.

[9]  Bonnie J. F. Meyer,et al.  Memory Improved: Reading and Memory Enhancement Across the Life Span Through Strategic Text Structures , 1988 .

[10]  Joellen T. Hartley,et al.  Language, memory, and aging: Aging and individual differences in memory for written discourse , 1988 .

[11]  Mark S. Rea,et al.  Proofreading under Different Levels of Illumination , 1978 .

[12]  Lynda S. Doll,et al.  The instructional effectiveness of the microcomputer with and elderly population , 1986 .

[13]  S. Czaja,et al.  Age differences in the performance of computer-based work. , 1993, Psychology and aging.

[14]  Gordon E. Legge,et al.  Psychophysics of reading—V. The role of contrast in normal vision , 1987, Vision Research.

[15]  E. A. Stine,et al.  Age differences in reading time allocation for propositionally dense sentences. , 1994 .

[16]  Hilary Horn Ratner,et al.  Changes in Adults' Prose Recall: Aging or Cognitive Demands?. , 1987 .

[17]  E. A. Stine On-line processing of written text by younger and older adults. , 1990, Psychology and aging.

[18]  B. Meyer The organization of prose and its effects on memory , 1975 .

[19]  Ronald P. Carver,et al.  Optimal Rate of Reading Prose. , 1982 .

[20]  J. Hartley,et al.  Reading speed and prose memory in older and younger adults. , 1994, Psychology and aging.

[21]  William J. Hoyer,et al.  Technology and the Older Person: Age, Sex and Experience as Moderators of Attitudes Towards Computers , 1984 .

[22]  Bonnie J. F. Meyer,et al.  Everyday cognition in adulthood and late life: Prose processing in adulthood: The text, the reader, and the task , 1989 .

[23]  Joseph Sharit,et al.  Stress reactions to computer-interactive tasks as a function of task structure and individual differences , 1993, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[24]  Judgments of origin and generation effects: comparisons between young and elderly adults. , 1989 .

[25]  W. Kintsch,et al.  Role of rhetorical structure in text comprehension. , 1982 .

[26]  G E Legge,et al.  Psychophysics of reading--X. Effects of age-related changes in vision. , 1991, Journal of gerontology.

[27]  Joellen T. Hartley Aging and Prose Memory: Tests of the Resource-Deficit Hypothesis , 1993 .

[28]  Karen M. Zabrucky,et al.  Adult age differences in comprehension and memory for computer-displayed and printed text , 1995 .