Does testing with feedback help grade-school children learn key concepts in science?

Abstract Testing effects have been well-established across a variety of studies involving school-age children. Specifically, children's test performance improves when they are given the opportunity to practice retrieval prior to the final test as compared to when practice involves only study. The current investigation focused on the influence of testing with feedback on fifth graders’ learning of science concepts. Across two experiments, 65 students studied twenty key concept definitions. After study, the definitions were randomly assigned to one of four conditions: control, test only, study only, and test plus feedback. Concepts assigned to the latter three conditions were presented again (either for test only, study only, or test plus feedback) during two separate sessions, and a final test was administered during a separate session. At the final test, students were asked to provide the definition for each of the twenty key concepts. Final test performance was best for definitions that had been tested with feedback, followed by recall for those that had only been tested or only restudied, with lowest performance for those that did not receive additional practice. Despite multiple sessions spaced across several days, however, performance for all conditions was low, which may have resulted from the ineffective use of feedback. In summary, testing followed by feedback can boost younger students learning of science concepts, but mastery will require the use of other strategies as well.

[1]  R. Bjork,et al.  Unsuccessful retrieval attempts enhance subsequent learning. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[2]  Nate Kornell,et al.  A cognitive-science based programme to enhance study efficacy in a high and low risk setting , 2007, The European journal of cognitive psychology.

[3]  Jeffrey D. Karpicke Retrieval-Based Learning , 2012 .

[4]  Jeffrey D. Karpicke,et al.  Test-Enhanced Learning , 2006, Psychological science.

[5]  M. McDaniel,et al.  Test-enhanced learning in the classroom: long-term improvements from quizzing. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[6]  H. P. Bahrick,et al.  Maintenance of Foreign Language Vocabulary and the Spacing Effect , 1993 .

[7]  Philippe C. Duchastel,et al.  Testing versus review: Effects on retention. , 1982 .

[8]  John Dunlosky,et al.  Improving Students’ Learning With Effective Learning Techniques: Promising Directions From Cognitive and Educational Psychology , 2012 .

[9]  Janet Metcalfe,et al.  Metacognition and control of study choice in children , 2013 .

[10]  Mark A. McDaniel,et al.  Tests and test feedback as learning sources , 1991 .

[11]  A. C. Butler,et al.  The critical role of retrieval practice in long-term retention , 2011, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[12]  Harold Pashler,et al.  Using tests to enhance 8th grade students' retention of U.S. history facts , 2009 .

[13]  John Dunlosky,et al.  Self-regulated learning and the allocation of study time. , 2011 .

[14]  H. F. Spitzer Studies in retention. , 1939 .

[15]  Katherine A Rawson,et al.  When is guessing incorrectly better than studying for enhancing memory? , 2012, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[16]  Nate Kornell,et al.  Principles of cognitive science in education: The effects of generation, errors, and feedback , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[17]  Catherine O. Fritz,et al.  Expanding retrieval practice: An effective aid to preschool children's learning , 2007, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[18]  H. Roediger,et al.  Inexpensive techniques to improve education: Applying cognitive psychology to enhance educational practice , 2012 .

[19]  John Dunlosky,et al.  Establishing and explaining the testing effect in free recall for young children. , 2014, Developmental psychology.

[20]  John Dunlosky,et al.  When Is Practice Testing Most Effective for Improving the Durability and Efficiency of Student Learning? , 2012 .

[21]  John Dunlosky,et al.  Optimizing schedules of retrieval practice for durable and efficient learning: how much is enough? , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[22]  Elizabeth J. Marsh,et al.  Memorial consequences of testing school-aged children , 2012, Memory.

[23]  Karen Swan,et al.  Using standards to improve middle school students' accuracy at evaluating the quality of their recall. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[24]  J. Metcalfe,et al.  Delayed versus immediate feedback in children’s and adults’ vocabulary learning , 2009, Memory & cognition.

[25]  Mark A. McDaniel,et al.  Quizzing in Middle-School Science: Successful Transfer Performance on Classroom Exams , 2013 .

[26]  Doug Rohrer,et al.  Tests enhance the transfer of learning. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[27]  M. Masson,et al.  Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[28]  Peter P. J. L. Verkoeijen,et al.  Why do some children benefit more from testing than others? Gist trace processing to explain the testing effect , 2011 .

[29]  Shana K. Carpenter Testing Enhances the Transfer of Learning , 2012 .