The Emergence and Collapse of Knowledge Boundaries

The dynamics of knowledge transfer is an important topic for engineering managers. In this paper, we study knowledge boundaries—barriers to knowledge transfer—in groups of experts, using topic modeling, a natural language processing technique, applied to transcript data from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's Circulatory Systems Advisory Panel. As predicted by prior theory, we find that knowledge boundaries emerge as the group faces increasingly challenging problems. Beyond this theory, we find that knowledge boundaries cease to structure communications between communities of practice when the group's expert ability is insufficient to solve its task, such as in the presence of high novelty. We conjecture that the amount of expert knowledge that the group can collectively bring to bear is a determining factor in boundary formation. This implies that some of the factors underlying knowledge boundary formation may aid—rather than hinder—knowledge aggregation. We briefly explore this conjecture using qualitative exploration of several relevant meetings. Finally, we discuss the implications of these results for organizations attempting to leverage their expertise given the state of their collective knowledge.

[1]  K. Weick,et al.  Organizing and the Process of Sensemaking , 2005 .

[2]  Beth A. Bechky Sharing Meaning Across Occupational Communities: The Transformation of Understanding on a Production Floor , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[3]  Jan Khre,et al.  The Mathematical Theory of Information , 2012 .

[4]  Mica R. Endsley,et al.  Toward a Theory of Situation Awareness in Dynamic Systems , 1995, Hum. Factors.

[5]  Cristian S. Calude The mathematical theory of information , 2007 .

[6]  V. Reyna,et al.  Physician decision making and cardiac risk: effects of knowledge, risk perception, risk tolerance, and fuzzy processing. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[7]  野中 郁次郎,et al.  The Knowledge-Creating Company: How , 1995 .

[8]  Steven B. Andrews,et al.  Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition , 1995, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[9]  Paul R. Carlile,et al.  Transferring, Translating, and Transforming: An Integrative Framework for Managing Knowledge Across Boundaries , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[10]  Gerd Gigerenzer,et al.  Adaptive Thinking: Rationality in the Real World , 2000 .

[11]  Álvaro Santana Acuña How Professors Think: Inside the Curious World of Academic Judgment , 2012 .

[12]  D. Dougherty Interpretive Barriers to Successful Product Innovation in Large Firms , 1992 .

[13]  G. Stasser,et al.  Pooling of Unshared Information in Group Decision Making: Biased Information Sampling During Discussion , 1985 .

[14]  J. Eichel Victims Of Groupthink A Psychological Study Of Foreign Policy Decisions And Fiascoes , 2016 .

[15]  I. Nonaka,et al.  SECI, Ba and Leadership: a Unified Model of Dynamic Knowledge Creation , 2000 .

[16]  D. Leonard-Barton,et al.  Wellsprings of Knowledge: Building and Sustaining the Sources of Innovation , 1995 .

[17]  Ralph A. Heidl,et al.  Knowledge, Networks, and Knowledge Networks , 2011 .

[18]  Katherine A. Karl,et al.  Leading Teams: Setting the Stage for Great Performances , 2002 .

[19]  Deborah Dougherty,et al.  Reimagining the Differentiation and Integration of Work for Sustained Product Innovation , 2001 .

[20]  A. Edmondson,et al.  Situated Knowledge and Learning in Dispersed Teams , 2002 .

[21]  C. Cramton The Mutual Knowledge Problem and Its Consequences for Dispersed Collaboration , 2001 .

[22]  Christopher L. Magee,et al.  Studying Group Behaviors: A tutorial on text and network analysis methods , 2012, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[23]  R. Weisberg Expertise and Reason in Creative Thinking: Evidence from Case Studies and the Laboratory , 2006 .

[24]  Beth A. Bechky Object Lessons: Workplace Artifacts as Representations of Occupational Jurisdiction1 , 2003, American Journal of Sociology.

[25]  L. Argote,et al.  KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER: A BASIS FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE IN FIRMS , 2000 .

[26]  Andy Dong,et al.  The latent semantic approach to studying design team communication , 2005 .

[27]  Thomas L. Griffiths,et al.  Learning author-topic models from text corpora , 2010, TOIS.

[28]  W. Orlikowski Sociomaterial Practices: Exploring Technology at Work , 2007 .

[29]  Haridimos Tsoukas,et al.  A Dialogical Approach to the Creation of New Knowledge in Organizations , 2009, Organ. Sci..

[30]  Ramkrishnan V. Tenkasi,et al.  P ERSPECTIVE M AKING AND P ERSPECTIVE T AKING IN C OMMUNITIES OF K NOWING , 2000 .

[31]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Strategy making in novel and complex worlds: the power of analogy , 2005 .

[32]  H. Rittel,et al.  Dilemmas in a general theory of planning , 1973 .

[33]  Paul R. Carlile,et al.  A Pragmatic View of Knowledge and Boundaries: Boundary Objects in New Product Development , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[34]  Jennifer K. Phillips,et al.  A Data–Frame Theory of Sensemaking , 2007 .

[35]  J. Brown,et al.  Bridging epistemologies: The generative dance between organizational knowledge and organizational knowing , 1999, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[36]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  Latent Dirichlet Allocation , 2001, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[37]  Dragomir R. Radev,et al.  How to Analyze Political Attention with Minimal Assumptions and Costs , 2010 .

[38]  E. Camenzind Treatment of in-stent restenosis--back to the future? , 2006, The New England journal of medicine.

[39]  L. Sproull,et al.  Coordinating Expertise in Software Development Teams , 2000 .

[40]  J. Brown,et al.  Knowledge and Organization: A Social-Practice Perspective , 2001 .

[41]  R. Selten,et al.  Bounded rationality: The adaptive toolbox , 2000 .

[42]  M. Polanyi,et al.  Tacit Knowing: Its Bearing on Some Problems of Philosophy , 1962 .

[43]  Ali E. Akgün,et al.  Organizational unlearning as changes in beliefs and routines in organizations , 2007 .

[44]  Sallie J. Weaver,et al.  Does teamwork improve performance in the operating room? A multilevel evaluation. , 2010, Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety.

[45]  Debra L. Shapiro,et al.  Maximizing cross-functional new product teams' innovativeness and constraint adherence: A conflict communications perspective. , 2001 .

[46]  Thomas L. Griffiths,et al.  The Author-Topic Model for Authors and Documents , 2004, UAI.

[47]  R. Wood,et al.  Enhancing Mental Models, Analogical Transfer, and Performance in Strategic Decision Making , 2009 .

[48]  Ray Reagans,et al.  Bridging the Knowledge Gap: The Influence of Strong Ties, Network Cohesion, and Network Range on the Transfer of Knowledge Between Organizational Units , 2012 .

[49]  M. Briel,et al.  Mortality in randomized controlled trials comparing drug-eluting vs. bare metal stents in coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis. , 2006, European heart journal.

[50]  Ann Majchrzak,et al.  Transcending Knowledge Differences in Cross-Functional Teams , 2012, Organ. Sci..

[51]  H. Simon,et al.  Perception in chess , 1973 .

[52]  L. Alberto Franco,et al.  Rethinking Soft OR interventions: Models as boundary objects , 2013, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[53]  R. Ackoff The Future of Operational Research is Past , 1979 .

[54]  G. Stasser,et al.  Expert Roles and Information Exchange during Discussion: The Importance of Knowing Who Knows What , 1995 .

[55]  Ray Reagans,et al.  Network Structure and Knowledge Transfer: The Effects of Cohesion and Range , 2003 .

[56]  B. Kogut,et al.  Exploring internal stickiness : Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm , 2007 .

[57]  G. Goodwin,et al.  The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance: The Making of a Dream Team: When Expert Teams Do Best , 2006 .

[58]  Margunn Aanestad,et al.  Changing practice through boundary organizing: A case from medical R&D , 2012 .

[59]  G. Stasser,et al.  Hidden Profiles: A Brief History , 2003 .

[60]  Donald A. Sch The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action , 1983 .

[61]  Donald A. Schön Educating the Reflective Practitioner: Toward a New Design for Teaching and Learning in the Professions , 1987 .

[62]  Michael Pidd,et al.  A Pilot Study of Problem Structuring , 1980 .

[63]  Anthony A Bavry,et al.  Late thrombosis of drug-eluting stents: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. , 2006, The American journal of medicine.

[64]  David B. Dunson,et al.  Probabilistic topic models , 2011, KDD '11 Tutorials.

[65]  W. P. Barnett,et al.  The red queen in organizational evolution , 2007 .

[66]  D. Krackhardt,et al.  Activating Cross-Boundary Knowledge: The Role of Simmelian Ties in the Generation of Innovations , 2010 .

[67]  Mark Steyvers,et al.  Topics in semantic representation. , 2007, Psychological review.

[68]  Mark Steyvers,et al.  Finding scientific topics , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[69]  Gabriel Szulanski The Process of Knowledge Transfer: A Diachronic Analysis of Stickiness , 2000 .

[70]  Mihai Surdeanu,et al.  The Stanford CoreNLP Natural Language Processing Toolkit , 2014, ACL.

[71]  I. Nonaka A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation , 1994 .

[72]  Kathleen L. Mosier Expert decision-making strategies , 1991 .

[73]  Beth A. Bechky,et al.  When Collections of Creatives Become Creative Collectives: A Field Study of Problem Solving at Work , 2006, Organ. Sci..

[74]  Aimée A. Kane Unlocking Knowledge Transfer Potential: Knowledge Demonstrability and Superordinate Social Identity , 2010, Organ. Sci..

[75]  Susan Leigh Star,et al.  Institutional Ecology, `Translations' and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39 , 1989 .

[76]  B. D. Finetti,et al.  Theory of Probability: A Critical Introductory Treatment , 2017 .

[77]  Yan Xiao,et al.  Coordination in Fast-Response Organizations , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[78]  Charles R. Schwenk,et al.  Conjectures on Cognitive Simplification in Acquisition and Divestment Decision Making , 1985 .

[79]  G. V. D. Vegt,et al.  Learning and performance in multidisciplinary teams: The importance of collective team identification , 2005 .

[80]  Ingrid M. Nembhard,et al.  Product Development and Learning in Project Teams: The Challenges Are the Benefits* , 2009 .