Training team problem solving skills: an event-based approach ? ? The views herein are those of the

Abstract Training problem solving teams presents a unique set of challenges to instructional designers. Given the criticality of teams to the performance of many organizations, it is important to develop training systems to support coordination and problem solving. While recent technological advancements, such as computer-based performance assessment, hold considerable promise for training, the introduction of technology alone does not guarantee that the training will be effective. This article focuses on three important questions that must be addressed when developing coordination and problem solving training: (1) How can technology best be used to provide an environment in which learning can take place? (2) What knowledge, skills, and attitudes need to be learned and trained to facilitate expert problem solving teams? and (3) How can the development of problem solving expertise be fostered through a systematic instructional strategy? A naturalistic decision making paradigm will be used to provide a theoretical framework for describing the problem solving task domain. An event-based approach to training will then be offered as a practical application for training teams to perform in naturalistic environments. Finally, conclusions are drawn regarding the provided framework for team learning.

[1]  Norbert L. Kerr,et al.  Social transition schemes: Charting the group's road to agreement. , 1981 .

[2]  Janis A. Cannon-Bowers,et al.  Performance measurement tools for enhancing team decision-making training. , 1997 .

[3]  Harald Schaub,et al.  Errors in Planning and Decision‐making and the Nature of Human Information Processing , 1994 .

[4]  Paul J. Feltovich,et al.  Categorization and Representation of Physics Problems by Experts and Novices , 1981, Cogn. Sci..

[5]  Mark C. Detweiler,et al.  The Role of Practice in Dual-Task Performance: Toward Workload Modeling a Connectionist/Control Architecture , 1988, Human factors.

[6]  Herbert H. Bell,et al.  Training Decision Makers for Complex Environments: Implications of the Naturalistic Decision Making Perspective , 1997 .

[7]  L. Lederman Debriefing: Toward a Systematic Assessment of Theory and Practice , 1992 .

[8]  D Zakay,et al.  Time pressure, training and decision effectiveness. , 1984, Ergonomics.

[9]  Lee Roy Beach,et al.  Image theory: Principles, goals, and plans in decision making , 1987 .

[10]  Jennifer E. Fowlkes,et al.  Event-based approach to training (EBAT). , 1998 .

[11]  A Bisseret,et al.  Application of signal detection theory to decision making in supervisory control The effect of the operator's experience , 1981 .

[12]  T. Connolly,et al.  The reinvention of decision making. , 1993 .

[13]  H. O'Neil Review of workforce readiness theoretical frameworks , 1997 .

[14]  George C. Thornton,et al.  Number of assessment center dimensions as a determinant of assessor accuracy. , 1989 .

[15]  H. Simon,et al.  Perception in chess , 1973 .

[16]  Martin R. Wong,et al.  A guide to systematic instructional design , 1974 .

[17]  Michelene T. H. Chi,et al.  Self-Explanations: How Students Study and Use Examples in Learning To Solve Problems. Technical Report No. 9. , 1987 .

[18]  Jennifer E. Fowlkes,et al.  Symposium on Distributed Simulation for Military Training of Teams/Groups: A Case Study of Distributed Training and Training Performance , 1995 .

[19]  R. L. Dipboye Organizational barriers to implementing a rational model of training. , 1997 .

[20]  J. G. Hollands,et al.  Engineering Psychology and Human Performance , 1984 .

[21]  Raanan Lipshitz,et al.  Converging themes in the study of decision making in realistic settings. , 1993 .

[22]  Paul G. Whitmore The “whys” and “hows” of modern instructional technology , 1981 .

[23]  Herbert H. Bell The Engineering of a Training Network , 1995 .

[24]  Walter Schneider,et al.  Training High-Performance Skills: Fallacies and Guidelines , 1985 .

[25]  Richard J. Klimoski,et al.  WHY DO ASSESSMENT CENTERS WORK? THE PUZZLE OF ASSESSMENT CENTER VALIDITY , 1987 .

[26]  G. Huber Managerial decision making , 1980 .

[27]  David Meister,et al.  Behavioral Analysis and Measurement Methods , 1985 .

[28]  D. Woods Coping with complexity: the psychology of human behaviour in complex systems , 1988 .

[29]  S. Kauffman At Home in the Universe: The Search for the Laws of Self-Organization and Complexity , 1995 .

[30]  Randy Hirokawa,et al.  Toward a General Theory of Group Decision Making , 1989 .

[31]  David F. Noble,et al.  Rules, Schema, and Decision Making. , 1987 .

[32]  M. Smith,et al.  Training in Organizations , 1991 .

[33]  Garold Stasser,et al.  Group decision making and social influence: A social interaction sequence model. , 1981 .

[34]  J. K. Murnighan,et al.  The Emergence of Norms in Competitive Decision-Making Groups. , 1985 .

[35]  René Amalberti,et al.  Cognitive Modelling of Fighter Aircraft Process Control: A Step Towards an Intelligent On-Board Assistance System , 1992, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[36]  Wayne F. Cascio,et al.  Applied psychology in personnel management , 1978 .

[37]  Vimla L. Patel,et al.  The general and specific nature of medical expertise: A critical look. , 1991 .

[38]  E. Salas,et al.  Shared mental models in expert team decision making. , 1993 .

[39]  Jens Rasmussen,et al.  Skills, rules, and knowledge; signals, signs, and symbols, and other distinctions in human performance models , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[40]  John H. Holland,et al.  Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems: An Introductory Analysis with Applications to Biology, Control, and Artificial Intelligence , 1992 .

[41]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  The Structure of "Unstructured" Decision Processes , 1976 .

[42]  G. Klein,et al.  A recognition-primed decision (RPD) model of rapid decision making. , 1993 .

[43]  Hélène Eyrolle,et al.  Expertise in dynamic environments , 1997 .

[44]  Roger W. Schvaneveldt,et al.  Measuring the Structure of Expertise , 1985, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[45]  V. Vroom,et al.  Leadership and decision-making , 1975 .