Fundamental Study for Constructing A System to Assist The Left Visual Field of Older Drivers : Effectiveness of The Alternative of The Left Front Side-view Mirror by The Central Visual Field

The purpose of this paper is to establish the basics of the systems that assist visibility of the left visual field for older drivers. The display was located either the left which corresponded to a left side mirror, or within the central effective visual field. Participants performed multiple tasks where tracking task using a steering wheel was a primary task, and judgment of situations using a left or front display was a secondary task. How the display location affected the judgment performance was explored for both young and older adults. We counted the number of the warning during the tracking task and measured the percentage correct reaction to displayed stimulus and reaction sensitivity. We investigated how these measures ware affected by age and display location. Mean warning number during the tracking tasks, the percentage correct recognition of situations and d' was affected age and display location. The central display was found to increase the percentage correct recognitions of situations.

[1]  H Summala,et al.  Cognitive load and detection thresholds in car following situations: safety implications for using mobile (cellular) telephones while driving. , 1999, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[2]  Najmedin Meshkati,et al.  THE OLDER DRIVER AND PASSENGER. , 1993 .

[3]  Atsuo Murata,et al.  Ergonomics of Steering Wheel Mounted Switch-How Number and Arrangement of Steering Wheel Mounted Switches Interactively Affects Performance , 2005 .

[4]  Atsuo Murata,et al.  Evaluation of Automotive Control-Display System by means of MentalWorkload , 2008 .

[5]  Heikki Summala,et al.  DETECTION THRESHOLDS IN CAR FOLLOWING SITUATIONS AND PERIPHERAL VISION: IMPLICATIONS FOR POSITIONING OF VISUALLY DEMANDING IN-CAR DISPLAYS , 1999 .

[6]  George E. Stelmach,et al.  THE EFFECTS OF AGE ON DRIVING SKILL COGNITIVE-MOTOR CAPABILITIES. , 1993 .

[7]  Y I Noy,et al.  Human factors in modern traffic systems. , 1997, Ergonomics.

[8]  P F Waller,et al.  HANDBOOK OF HUMAN FACTORS AND ERGONOMICS. SECOND EDITION. CHAPTER 59: HUMAN FACTORS IN TRANSPORTATION , 1997 .

[9]  W W Wierwille,et al.  AUTOMOTIVE ERGONOMICS. CHAPTER 14. VISUAL AND MANUAL DEMANDS OF IN- CAR CONTROLS AND DISPLAYS , 1993 .

[10]  C D Wickens,et al.  Compatibility and Resource Competition between Modalities of Input, Central Processing, and Output , 1983, Human factors.

[11]  G. Stelmach,et al.  Age-Related Differences in a Kinematic Analysis of Precued Movements , 1990, Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement.

[12]  Daniel Imbeau,et al.  AGE, DISPLAY DESIGN AND DRIVING PERFORMANCE , 1993 .

[13]  G. Stelmach,et al.  Effects of age on motor preparation and restructuring , 1989 .

[14]  Gavriel Salvendy,et al.  Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics , 2005 .

[15]  Hitoshi Kanamori,et al.  A human factors study of switches installed on automotive steering wheel , 2003 .