Efficacy and safety of procalcitonin guidance in reducing the duration of antibiotic treatment in critically ill patients: a randomised, controlled, open-label trial.

BACKGROUND In critically ill patients, antibiotic therapy is of great importance but long duration of treatment is associated with the development of antimicrobial resistance. Procalcitonin is a marker used to guide antibacterial therapy and reduce its duration, but data about safety of this reduction are scarce. We assessed the efficacy and safety of procalcitonin-guided antibiotic treatment in patients in intensive care units (ICUs) in a health-care system with a comparatively low use of antibiotics. METHODS We did a prospective, multicentre, randomised, controlled, open-label intervention trial in 15 hospitals in the Netherlands. Critically ill patients aged at least 18 years, admitted to the ICU, and who received their first dose of antibiotics no longer than 24 h before inclusion in the study for an assumed or proven infection were eligible to participate. Patients who received antibiotics for presumed infection were randomly assigned (1:1), using a computer-generated list, and stratified (according to treatment centre, whether infection was acquired before or during ICU stay, and dependent on severity of infection [ie, sepsis, severe sepsis, or septic shock]) to receive either procalcitonin-guided or standard-of-care antibiotic discontinuation. Both patients and investigators were aware of group assignment. In the procalcitonin-guided group, a non-binding advice to discontinue antibiotics was provided if procalcitonin concentration had decreased by 80% or more of its peak value or to 0·5 μg/L or lower. In the standard-of-care group, patients were treated according to local antibiotic protocols. Primary endpoints were antibiotic daily defined doses and duration of antibiotic treatment. All analyses were done by intention to treat. Mortality analyses were completed for all patients (intention to treat) and for patients in whom antibiotics were stopped while being on the ICU (per-protocol analysis). Safety endpoints were reinstitution of antibiotics and recurrent inflammation measured by C-reactive protein concentrations and they were measured in the population adhering to the stopping rules (per-protocol analysis). The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01139489, and was completed in August, 2014. FINDINGS Between Sept 18, 2009, and July 1, 2013, 1575 of the 4507 patients assessed for eligibility were randomly assigned to the procalcitonin-guided group (761) or to standard-of-care (785). In 538 patients (71%) in the procalcitonin-guided group antibiotics were discontinued in the ICU. Median consumption of antibiotics was 7·5 daily defined doses (IQR 4·0-12·7) in the procalcitonin-guided group versus 9·3 daily defined doses (5·0-16·6) in the standard-of-care group (between-group absolute difference 2·69, 95% CI 1·26-4·12, p<0·0001). Median duration of treatment was 5 days (3-9) in the procalcitonin-guided group and 7 days (4-11) in the standard-of-care group (between-group absolute difference 1·22, 0·65-1·78, p<0·0001). Mortality at 28 days was 149 (20%) of 761 patients in the procalcitonin-guided group and 196 (25%) of 785 patients in the standard-of-care group (between-group absolute difference 5·4%, 95% CI 1·2-9·5, p=0·0122) according to the intention-to-treat analysis, and 107 (20%) of 538 patients in the procalcitonin-guided group versus 121 (27%) of 457 patients in the standard-of-care group (between-group absolute difference 6·6%, 1·3-11·9, p=0·0154) in the per-protocol analysis. 1-year mortality in the per-protocol analysis was 191 (36%) of 538 patients in the procalcitonin-guided and 196 (43%) of 457 patients in the standard-of-care groups (between-group absolute difference 7·4, 1·3-13·8, p=0·0188). INTERPRETATION Procalcitonin guidance stimulates reduction of duration of treatment and daily defined doses in critically ill patients with a presumed bacterial infection. This reduction was associated with a significant decrease in mortality. Procalcitonin concentrations might help physicians in deciding whether or not the presumed infection is truly bacterial, leading to more adequate diagnosis and treatment, the cornerstones of antibiotic stewardship. FUNDING Thermo Fisher Scientific.

[1]  M. Levy,et al.  Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2008 , 2007, Intensive Care Medicine.

[2]  M. Christ-Crain,et al.  Effect of procalcitonin-guided treatment on antibiotic use and outcome in lower respiratory tract infections: cluster-randomised, single-blinded intervention trial , 2004, The Lancet.

[3]  D. Pittet,et al.  Diagnostic value of procalcitonin, interleukin-6, and interleukin-8 in critically ill patients admitted with suspected sepsis. , 2001, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[4]  R. Paladini,et al.  Procalcitonin as a prognostic and diagnostic tool for septic complications after major trauma* , 2009, Critical care medicine.

[5]  B. Bein,et al.  Procalcitonin to guide duration of antibiotic therapy in intensive care patients: a randomized prospective controlled trial , 2009, Critical care.

[6]  F. Tubach,et al.  Procalcitonin to Guide Initiation and Duration of Antibiotic Treatment in Acute Respiratory Infections: An Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis , 2012, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[7]  D. Gilbert Serum procalcitonin levels: comment on "Effectiveness and safety of procalcitonin-guided antibiotic therapy in lower respiratory tract infections in 'real life'". , 2012, Archives of internal medicine.

[8]  M. Assicot,et al.  High serum procalcitonin concentrations in patients with sepsis and infection , 1993, The Lancet.

[9]  H. Goossens,et al.  Antimicrobial Drug Use and Resistance in Europe , 2008, Emerging infectious diseases.

[10]  France Gauvin,et al.  Serum procalcitonin and C-reactive protein levels as markers of bacterial infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2004, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[11]  B. Bein,et al.  Procalcitonin-guided algorithm to reduce length of antibiotic therapy in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock , 2013, BMC Infectious Diseases.

[12]  Peter Schlattmann,et al.  Procalcitonin as a diagnostic marker for sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2013, The Lancet. Infectious diseases.

[13]  Anthony S McLean,et al.  Accuracy of procalcitonin for sepsis diagnosis in critically ill patients: systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2007, The Lancet. Infectious diseases.

[14]  K. Becker,et al.  Procalcitonin assay in systemic inflammation, infection, and sepsis: Clinical utility and limitations , 2008, Critical care medicine.

[15]  J. Garnacho-Montero,et al.  De-escalation of empirical therapy is associated with lower mortality in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock , 2013, Intensive Care Medicine.

[16]  T. Bregenzer,et al.  Effect of procalcitonin-based guidelines vs standard guidelines on antibiotic use in lower respiratory tract infections: the ProHOSP randomized controlled trial. , 2009, JAMA.

[17]  F. Tubach,et al.  Use of procalcitonin to reduce patients' exposure to antibiotics in intensive care units (PRORATA trial): a multicentre randomised controlled trial , 2010, The Lancet.

[18]  P. Svoboda,et al.  Can procalcitonin help us in timing of re-intervention in septic patients after multiple trauma or major surgery? , 2007, Hepato-gastroenterology.

[19]  A. Marra,et al.  Clinical and economic impact of procalcitonin to shorten antimicrobial therapy in septic patients with proven bacterial infection in an intensive care setting. , 2013, Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease.

[20]  M. Christ-Crain,et al.  Procalcitonin guidance of antibiotic therapy in community-acquired pneumonia: a randomized trial. , 2006, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[21]  Bryan T Grenfell,et al.  Global antibiotic consumption 2000 to 2010: an analysis of national pharmaceutical sales data. , 2014, The Lancet. Infectious diseases.

[22]  M. Christ-Crain,et al.  Antibiotic treatment of exacerbations of COPD: a randomized, controlled trial comparing procalcitonin-guidance with standard therapy. , 2007, Chest.

[23]  J. Vincent,et al.  Sepsis biomarkers. Value and limitations. , 2014, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[24]  M. Bailey,et al.  Procalcitonin algorithm in critically ill adults with undifferentiated infection or suspected sepsis. A randomized controlled trial. , 2014, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[25]  J. Pugin,et al.  Use of procalcitonin to shorten antibiotic treatment duration in septic patients: a randomized trial. , 2008, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[26]  L. Rice The Maxwell Finland Lecture: for the duration-rational antibiotic administration in an era of antimicrobial resistance and clostridium difficile. , 2008, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[27]  P. Olinga,et al.  Procalcitonin behaves as a fast responding acute phase protein in vivo and in vitro , 2000, Critical care medicine.

[28]  N. D. de Keizer,et al.  External validation of Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation IV in Dutch intensive care units and comparison with Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II and Simplified Acute Physiology Score II. , 2011, Journal of critical care.

[29]  A. Armaganidis,et al.  Procalcitonin-guided algorithms of antibiotic therapy in the intensive care unit: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials , 2010, Critical care medicine.

[30]  D. Altman,et al.  Multiple significance tests: the Bonferroni method , 1995, BMJ.

[31]  C. Sprung,et al.  Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock, 2012 , 2013, Intensive Care Medicine.