Possible overexposure of pregnant women to emissions from a walk through metal detector

This paper presents a systematic procedure to evaluate the induced current densities and electric fields due to walk-through metal detector (WTMD) exposure. This procedure is then used to assess the exposure of nine pregnant women models exposed to one WTMD model. First, we measured the magnetic field generated by the WTMD, then we extracted the equivalent current source to represent the WTMD emissions and finally we calculated the induced current densities and electric fields using the impedance method. The WTMD emissions and the induced fields in the pregnant women and fetus models are then compared to the ICNIRP Guidelines and the IEEE C95.6 exposure safety standard. The results prove the consistency between maximum permissible exposure (MPE) levels and basic restrictions for the ICNIRP Guidelines and IEEE C95.6. We also found that this particular WTMD complies with the ICNIRP basic restrictions for month 1-5 models, but leads to both fetus and pregnant women overexposure for month 6-9 models. The IEEE C95.6 restrictions (MPEs and basic restrictions) are not exceeded. The fetus overexposure of this particular WTMD calls for carefully conducted safety evaluations of security systems before they are deployed.

[1]  Michal Okoniewski,et al.  Low Frequency Finite Difference Time Domain (FDTD) for Modeling of Induced Fields in Humans Close to Line Sources , 2000 .

[2]  A. Ahlbom Guidelines for limiting exposure to time-varying electric, magnetic, and electromagnetic fields (up to 300 GHz) , 1998 .

[3]  Krys Caputa,et al.  Magnetic field exposures for UK live-line workers. , 2002, Physics in medicine and biology.

[4]  R. W. Lau,et al.  The dielectric properties of biological tissues: III. Parametric models for the dielectric spectrum of tissues. , 1996, Physics in medicine and biology.

[5]  W. Kainz,et al.  Calculation of induced current densities and specific absorption rates (SAR) for pregnant women exposed to hand-held metal detectors. , 2003, Physics in medicine and biology.

[6]  W. Kainz,et al.  Evaluations of Specific Absorption Rate and Temperature Increase Within Pregnant Female Models in Magnetic Resonance Imaging Birdcage Coils , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques.

[7]  Om P. Gandhi,et al.  Calculation of EM power deposition for operator exposure to RF induction heaters , 1988 .

[8]  Hiroshi Kanai,et al.  Impedence Method for Calculation of Power Deposition Patterns in Magnetically Induced Hyperthermia , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[9]  Om P. Gandhi,et al.  Comparison of various safety guidelines for electronic article surveillance devices with pulsed magnetic fields , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[10]  C Gabriel,et al.  The dielectric properties of biological tissues: I. Literature survey. , 1996, Physics in medicine and biology.

[11]  O. Gandhi Some numerical methods for dosimetry: Extremely low frequencies to microwave frequencies , 1995 .

[12]  K. Cole,et al.  Dispersion and Absorption in Dielectrics I. Alternating Current Characteristics , 1941 .

[13]  Wolfgang Kainz,et al.  Implantable cardiac pacemaker electromagnetic compatibility testing in a novel security system Simulator , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[14]  R. W. Lau,et al.  The dielectric properties of biological tissues: II. Measurements in the frequency range 10 Hz to 20 GHz. , 1996, Physics in medicine and biology.

[15]  Safety evaluation of walk-through metal detectors , 2005, 2005 International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility, 2005. EMC 2005..

[16]  O. Gandhi,et al.  A 3-D impedance method to calculate power deposition in biological bodies subjected to time varying magnetic fields , 1988, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[17]  Magnetic field from spot welding equipment—is the basic restriction exceeded? , 2004, Bioelectromagnetics.

[18]  M. A. Stuchly,et al.  High-resolution organ dosimetry for human exposure to low-frequency magnetic fields , 1998 .

[19]  Calculation of magnetic field-induced current densities for humans from EAS countertop activation/deactivation devices that use ferromagnetic cores. , 2005, Physics in medicine and biology.

[20]  R Matthes,et al.  Response to questions and comments on ICNIRP. , 1998, Health physics.

[21]  O. Gandhi,et al.  Calculation of induced current densities for humans by magnetic fields from electronic article surveillance devices. , 2001, Physics in medicine and biology.

[22]  Osamu Hashimoto,et al.  Numerical study on an equivalent source model for inhomogeneous magnetic field dosimetry in the low-frequency range , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[23]  P. Dimbylow,et al.  Induced current densities from low-frequency magnetic fields in a 2 mm resolution, anatomically realistic model of the body. , 1998, Physics in medicine and biology.

[24]  O P Gandhi,et al.  Currents induced in anatomic models of the human for uniform and nonuniform power frequency magnetic fields. , 2001, Bioelectromagnetics.

[25]  O.P. Gandhi,et al.  Calculation of electric fields and currents induced in a millimeter-resolution human model at 60 Hz using the FDTD method with a novel time-to-frequency-domain conversion , 1996, IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium. 1996 Digest.

[26]  M A Stuchly,et al.  Numerical evaluation of 60 Hz magnetic induction in the human body in complex occupational environments. , 1999, Physics in medicine and biology.