Understanding decision making in teachers’ curriculum design approaches

AbstractThe goal of this study was to reach a better understanding of the intuitive decisions teachers make when designing a technology-rich learning environment. A multiple case-study design was employed to examine what kinds of factors (external priorities, existing orientations or practical concerns) influence design interactions of teams of kindergarten teachers. This study combines semi-structured interview data on teachers’ existing orientations with analysis of teachers’ design discussions during the design of learning material for a technology-rich learning environment. Three teams of teachers voluntarily participated. Findings on the existing orientations suggest that knowledge and beliefs about teaching and learning related to knowledge and beliefs on technology and early literacy. The analysis of teachers’ discussions revealed that the process could be characterized to a large extent as brainstorms; and that problems are not addressed in-depth. Rather they are resolved through brainstorming, and most argumentation falls in the realm of practical concerns: how to organize learning activities and how to respond to contingencies. The findings of this study suggest that teachers’ explicated design reasoning is mostly influenced by practical concerns, yet their own knowledge and beliefs play an important role at the start of the design process. However, these existing orientations as well as the practical concerns that emerge during the conversation tend to be narrow in scope. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed in light of how this study provides understanding of how to support these teachers.

[1]  Nigel Cross,et al.  Expertise in Design: an overview , 2004 .

[2]  Shawn Y. Stevens,et al.  Understanding Pedagogical Design Capacity through Teachers' Narratives. , 2011 .

[3]  Nigel Cross,et al.  Creativity in the design process: co-evolution of problem–solution , 2001 .

[4]  Albert W. M. Hoogveld,et al.  Application of an instructional systems design approach by teachers in higher education: individual versus team design , 2003 .

[5]  Ralph T. Putnam,et al.  Learning to teach. , 1996 .

[6]  Ilana Seidel Horn,et al.  Teaching Replays, Teaching Rehearsals, and Re-Visions of Practice: Learning from Colleagues in a Mathematics Teacher Community , 2010, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[7]  Geert Kelchtermans,et al.  Collaborative Curriculum Development: an encounter of different professional knowledge systems , 1996 .

[8]  Matthew J. Koehler,et al.  Tracing the development of teacher knowledge in a design seminar: Integrating content, pedagogy and technology , 2007, Comput. Educ..

[9]  Joke Voogt,et al.  Designing technology for emergent literacy: The PictoPal initiative , 2009, Comput. Educ..

[10]  Matthew J. Koehler.  What happens when teachers design educational technology , 2005 .

[11]  H. Borko.  Professional Development and Teacher Learning: Mapping the Terrain , 2004 .

[12]  J. George,et al.  Facilitating teachers' professional growth through their involvement in creating context-based materials in science , 2002 .

[13]  Deborah J. Stipek,et al.  Early childhood education teachers: Do they practice what they preach? , 1997 .

[14]  Matthew J. Koehler,et al.  What Happens When Teachers Design Educational Technology? The Development of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge , 2005 .

[15]  P. Winne,et al.  Handbook of educational psychology , 2015 .

[16]  Anselm L. Strauss,et al.  Basics of qualitative research : techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory , 1998 .

[17]  J. Remillard.  Examining Key Concepts in Research on Teachers’ Use of Mathematics Curricula , 2005 .

[18]  Sebastian Lera,et al.  Empirical and theoretical studies of design judgement: a review , 1981 .

[19]  David H. Jonassen,et al.  Designing for decision making , 2012 .

[20]  N. Cross.  Designerly ways of knowing , 2006 .

[21]  M. Ben‐Peretz.  The Teacher-Curriculum Encounter: Freeing Teachers from the Tyranny of Texts, Miriam Ben-Peretz. 1990. SUNY, Albany, NY. 152 pages. ISBN: 0-7914-0376-9. $12.95 , 1992 .

[22]  Joke Voogt,et al.  Teachers enacting a technology-rich curriculum for emergent literacy , 2012 .

[23]  Marinus Voeten,et al.  New learning and choices of secondary school teachers when arranging learning environments , 2005 .

[24]  David H. Jonassen,et al.  Toward a design theory of problem solving , 2000 .

[25]  J. Little.  Locating learning in teachers’ communities of practice: opening up problems of analysis in records of everyday work , 2002 .

[26]  Charles R. Coble,et al.  Teachers Designing Curriculum as Professional Development: A Model for Transformational Science Teaching. , 1997 .

[27]  W. Doyle,et al.  The practicality ethic in teacher decision-making , 1977 .

[28]  P. Grossman.  The Making of a Teacher: Teacher Knowledge and Teacher Education , 1990 .

[29]  Stephen T. Kerr.  How teachers design their materials: Implications for instructional design , 1981 .

[30]  D. Walker.  A Study of Deliberation in Three Curriculum Projects , 1971 .

[31]  Petra Badke-Schaub,et al.  Thinking in design teams - an analysis of team communication , 2002 .

[32]  Fred Paas,et al.  The effects of a Web-based training in an instructional systems design approach on teachers' instructional design behavior , 2001, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[33]  H. Rittel,et al.  Dilemmas in a general theory of planning , 1973 .

[34]  Ikseon Choi,et al.  Three dimensions of reflective thinking in solving design problems: a conceptual model , 2011 .

[35]  Jan Turbill,et al.  A Researcher Goes to School: Using Technology in the Kindergarten Literacy Curriculum , 2001 .

[36]  Adam Handelzalts,et al.  Collaborative curriculum development in teacher design teams , 2009 .

[37]  Erik Stolterman,et al.  The Design Way: Intentional Change in an Unpredictable World , 2002 .

[38]  Alberto Bacchelli,et al.  Team design communication patterns in e-learning design and development , 2013, Educational Technology Research and Development.

[39]  R. Charlesworth,et al.  Predictors of the developmental appropriateness of the beliefs and practices of first, second, and third grade teachers , 1998 .

[40]  L. Stenhouse.  An introduction to curriculum research and development , 1975 .

[41]  B. Lawson.  Schemata, gambits and precedent: some factors in design expertise , 2004 .