Determination of cell origin after marrow transplantation in canines by polymerase chain reaction and quantitation of the ZFY/ZFX genes.

BACKGROUND In order to follow the course of bone marrow engraftment in dogs, and to determine the presence, and percentage, of donor-derived cells in other canine tissues, a simple and fast method of determining cell origin after sex-mismatched bone marrow transplantation was developed. METHODS Using universal primers, fragments from genomic DNA corresponding to ZFX and ZFY genes were amplified by polymerase chain reaction. A restriction fragment length polymorphism, combined with densitometric analysis, was then used to distinguish and quantitate ZFY and ZFX sequences. Unknown samples were analyzed against standards of known mixtures of male and female DNA. RESULTS Canine ZFY and ZFX genes were clearly resolved after amplification, digestion with HaeIII, and denaturing polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Microchimerism could be detected in male and female dog DNA samples derived from a range of fresh and frozen tissues including spleen, testicle, and the central nervous system. The levels of chimerism determined using this method were in either agreement with results obtained by karyotyping or more sensitive, with a detection limit of 0.4% compared with 1-2%. CONCLUSIONS Polymerase chain reaction/restriction fragment length polymorphism detection of the ZFY and ZFX genes was found to be simple, accurate, and reliable for assessing engraftment in dogs. When compared with cytogenetic analysis, this method was found to be faster to perform, more capable of detecting lower levels of microchimerism, and useful for detecting donor-derived cells in stored specimens and in tissues other than peripheral blood or bone marrow.

[1]  T. Occhiodoro,et al.  Canine fucosidosis: a model for retroviral gene transfer into haematopoietic stem cells , 1997, Neuromuscular Disorders.

[2]  E. Bryant,et al.  USE OF (CA)n POLYMORPHISMS TO DETERMINE THE ORIGIN OF BLOOD CELLS AFTER ALLOGENEIC CANINE MARROW GRAFTING , 1994, Transplantation.

[3]  K. Dohi,et al.  Monitoring for engraftment following rat orthotopic liver transplantation by the polymerase chain reaction. , 1994, Transplantation proceedings.

[4]  W. Hawthorne,et al.  Optimal bone marrow dose for long-term engraftment after total lymphoid irradiation in dogs. , 1992, Transplantation proceedings.

[5]  G. J. Stewart,et al.  Amelioration of clinical disease following bone marrow transplantation in fucosidase-deficient dogs. , 1992, American journal of medical genetics.

[6]  V. Lyamichev Unusual conformation of (dA)n.(dT)n-tracts as revealed by cyclobutane thymine-thymine dimer formation. , 1991, Nucleic acids research.

[7]  A. Morley,et al.  Monoclonality in B cell lymphoma detected in paraffin wax embedded sections using the polymerase chain reaction. , 1990, Journal of clinical pathology.

[8]  W. Hawthorne,et al.  Canine pancreas and kidney transplantation following total-lymphoid irradiation. , 1990, Transplantation.

[9]  R. Storb,et al.  Canine models of bone marrow transplantation. , 1990, Laboratory animal science.

[10]  G. J. Stewart,et al.  Restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis of class II genes and canine bone marrow transplantation: correlation with mixed lymphocyte reactivity. , 1989, Transplantation proceedings.

[11]  H. Deeg,et al.  JOINT REPORT OF THE THIRD INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON CANINE IMMUNOGENETICS: II. ANALYSIS OF THE SEROLOGICAL TYPING OF CELLS , 1987, Transplantation.

[12]  R. Storb,et al.  HEMOPOIETIC GRAFTS BETWEEN DLA‐IDENTICAL CANINE LITTERMATES FOLLOWING DIMETHYL MYLERAN: EVIDENCE FOR RESISTANCE TO GRAFTS NOT ASSOCIATED WITH DLA AND ABROGATED BY ANTITHYMOCYTE SERUM , 1977, Transplantation.

[13]  H. Ochs,et al.  Immunologic Reactivity in Canine Marrow Graft Recipients , 1974, The Journal of Immunology.

[14]  R. Storb,et al.  MARROW GRAFTS BY COMBINED MARROW AND LEUKOCYTE INFUSIONS IN UNRELATED DOGS SELECTED BY HISTOCOMPATIBILITY TYPING , 1968, Transplantation.