Comparison of Relay Feedback Tuning and Other Tuning Methods for a Digitally Controlled Buck Converter

This paper presents a comparison between relay feedback tuning and other controller tuning methods for a digitally controlled DC-DC buck converter operating in continuous conduction mode. In the first method, a relay feedback test is used to obtain ultimate gain and period measurements experimentally. PI and PID controllers are then tuned according to the classic Ziegler-Nichols formulae. In the second and third method, a converter model is developed based on experimental identification and analytical derivation, respectively. PI and PID controllers are then designed through optimization of an integral performance criterion applied to the simulated step response. Experimental tests show that all three approaches to controller tuning provide comparable and acceptable results, but the simplicity of the approach based on the relay feedback test makes it a viable alternative to offline-tuned optimal controllers given the ability of the former to retune the controller to adapt to system changes. Results also suggest that with some improvements to the test and tuning rules, a well-tuned controller may be produced with reasonable computational effort in the auto-tuning schema.

[1]  D. Maksimovic,et al.  An Autotuning Digital Controller for DC–DC Power Converters Based on Online Frequency-Response Measurement , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics.

[2]  D. Maksimovic,et al.  Autotuning techniques for digitally-controlled point-of-load converters with wide range of capacitive loads , 2007, APEC 07 - Twenty-Second Annual IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition.

[3]  Paolo Mattavelli,et al.  Digital control of high-frequency switched-mode power converters , 2015 .

[4]  Keith R. Godfrey,et al.  Rule-based autotuning based on frequency domain identification , 1998, IEEE Trans. Control. Syst. Technol..

[5]  Marian K. Kazimierczuk,et al.  Open-loop small-signal transfer functions of the quadratic buck PWM DC-DC converter in CCM , 2014, IECON 2014 - 40th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society.

[6]  Tore Hägglund,et al.  Automatic tuning of simple regulators with specifications on phase and amplitude margins , 1984, Autom..

[7]  Abdul R. Beig,et al.  Quasi optimum PI controller tuning rules for a grid-connected three phase AC to DC PWM rectifier , 2018 .

[8]  Tao Liu,et al.  A tutorial review on process identification from step or relay feedback test , 2013 .

[9]  P. Mattavelli,et al.  Robust Relay-Feedback Based Autotuning for DC-DC Converters , 2007, 2007 IEEE Power Electronics Specialists Conference.

[10]  S. Saggini,et al.  Autotuning of Digitally Controlled DC–DC Converters Based on Relay Feedback , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics.

[11]  Qian Zhenyu Chip Multilayer Ceramic Capacitor and Its Applications(2) , 2009 .

[12]  Robert W. Erickson,et al.  Fundamentals of Power Electronics , 2001 .

[13]  A. Prodic,et al.  Limit-Cycle Oscillations Based Auto-Tuning System for Digitally Controlled DC–DC Power Supplies , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics.

[14]  Konstantinos S. Tsakalis,et al.  A study on the on-line system identification and PID tuning of a buck converter , 2016, 2016 IEEE 13th International Conference on Networking, Sensing, and Control (ICNSC).

[15]  D. Maksimovic,et al.  Automated Digital Controller Design for Switching Converters , 2005, 2005 IEEE 36th Power Electronics Specialists Conference.

[16]  D. Atherton Relay autotuning : An overview and alternative approach , 2006 .

[17]  D. Maksimovic,et al.  Impact of digital control in power electronics , 2004, 2004 Proceedings of the 16th International Symposium on Power Semiconductor Devices and ICs.

[18]  K. Rinne,et al.  A self-compensating adaptive digital regulator for switching converters based on linear prediction , 2006, Twenty-First Annual IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition, 2006. APEC '06..

[19]  Igor Boiko Non-parametric Tuning of PID Controllers , 2012 .