Acoustical Quality Assessment of the Classroom Environment

Teaching is one of the most important factors affecting any education system. Many research efforts have been conducted to facilitate the presentation modes used by instructors in classrooms as well as provide means for students to review lectures through web browsers. Other studies have been made to provide acoustical design recommendations for classrooms like room size and reverberation times. However, using acoustical features of classrooms as a way to provide education systems with feedback about the learning process was not thoroughly investigated in any of these studies. We propose a system that extracts different sound features of students and instructors, and then uses machine learning techniques to evaluate the acoustical quality of any learning environment. We infer conclusions about the students' satisfaction with the quality of lectures. Using classifiers instead of surveys and other subjective ways of measures can facilitate and speed such experiments which enables us to perform them continuously. We believe our system enables education systems to continuously review and improve their teaching strategies and acoustical quality of classrooms.

[1]  M. P. Norton,et al.  Fundamentals of Noise and Vibration Analysis for Engineers , 1990 .

[2]  A. Greenwald Validity concerns and usefulness of student ratings of instruction. , 1997, The American psychologist.

[3]  E. Vilkman,et al.  Changes in Teachers’ Speech during a Working Day with and without Electric Sound Amplification , 2002, Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica.

[4]  Peter Seldin,et al.  Changing Practices in Evaluating Teaching: A Practical Guide to Improved Faculty Performance and Promotion/Tenure Decisions , 1999 .

[5]  D. Rubin,et al.  Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM - algorithm plus discussions on the paper , 1977 .

[6]  E. Vilkman,et al.  Voice changes during work: subjective complaints and objective measurements for female primary and secondary schoolteachers. , 2002, Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation.

[7]  Laura R. Winer,et al.  The "Intelligent Classroom": changing teaching and learning with an evolving technological environment , 2002, Comput. Educ..

[8]  Lawrence R. Rabiner,et al.  On the use of autocorrelation analysis for pitch detection , 1977 .

[9]  Gregory D. Abowd,et al.  Classroom 2000: An Experiment with the Instrumentation of a Living Educational Environment , 1999, IBM Syst. J..

[10]  Virginia Teller Review of Speech and language processing: an introduction to natural language processing, computational linguistics, and speech recognition by Daniel Jurafsky and James H. Martin. Prentice Hall 2000. , 2000 .

[11]  Zhen-Yang Wu,et al.  Robust GMM Based Gender Classification using Pitch and RASTA-PLP Parameters of Speech , 2006, 2006 International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics.

[12]  J. Cooperstock The Classroom of the Future : Enhancing Education through Augmented Reality , 2001 .

[13]  Jonas Brunskog,et al.  Increase in voice level and speaker comfort in lecture rooms. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  James H. Martin,et al.  Speech and language processing: an introduction to natural language processing , 2000 .

[15]  David Franklin,et al.  The intelligent classroom: providing competent assistance , 2001, AGENTS '01.

[16]  Richard O. Duda,et al.  Pattern classification and scene analysis , 1974, A Wiley-Interscience publication.

[17]  James H. Martin,et al.  Speech and Language Processing: An Introduction to Natural Language Processing, Computational Linguistics, and Speech Recognition , 2000 .

[18]  Lynn Wilcox,et al.  Room with a Rear View: Meeting Capture in a Multimedia Conference Room , 2000, IEEE Multim..

[19]  David Franklin Cooperating with people: the Intelligent Classroom , 1998, AAAI/IAAI.

[20]  Wolfgang Hess,et al.  Pitch Determination of Speech Signals , 1983 .

[21]  D. C. Hodgson,et al.  Book Review : Fundamentals of Noise and Vibration Analysis for Engineers: M.P. Norton Cambridge University Press Cambridge, UK 1989, 619 pp, $95 (hard cover) $37.50 (paperback) , 1990 .

[22]  P. Nurmi Mixture Models , 2008 .

[23]  Good Classroom Acoustics is a Good Investment ) , 2012 .

[24]  M. Hodgson,et al.  Measurement and prediction of typical speech and background-noise levels in university classrooms during lectures , 1999 .

[25]  Germán Castellanos-Domínguez,et al.  An improved method for voice pathology detection by means of a HMM-based feature space transformation , 2010, Pattern Recognit..

[26]  E. Vilkman,et al.  Working-Day Effects on the Spectral Characteristics of Teaching Voice , 1998, Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica.