Using GSS to Design Organizational Processes and Information Systems: An Action Research Study on Collaborative Business Engineering

During an action research study a collaborative business engineering approach was developed, applied, and evaluated. Key characteristic of the approach is its focus on the participative design of organizational processes and supporting information systems. Following the approach, various design activities are carried out in close cooperation with groups of stakeholders supported by a Group Support System (GSS). This paper describes and reflects on the execution of these collaborative design activities in a police organization. Lessons learned with respect to GSS and collaborative design are formulated. Key insights illustrate the stakeholders' perception of the group technology and the way in which it facilitated an efficient design process.

[1]  Nina Katic,et al.  Current advances in group-supported business process reengineering , 1996, Proceedings of HICSS-29: 29th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[2]  Gary W. Dickson,et al.  GRIP-group requirement identification process: the integration of GDSS technology into the systems development life cycle , 1992, Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[3]  Douglas R. Vogel,et al.  Modeling with a group modeling tool: group support, model quality, and validation , 1994, 1994 Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[4]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Lessons from a Dozen Years of Group Support Systems Research: A Discussion of Lab and Field Findings , 1996, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[5]  R. Charan,et al.  How networks reshape organizations--for results. , 1991, Harvard business review.

[6]  Daniel A. Silverman,et al.  Facilitating organizational change , 1996 .

[7]  Gary W. Dickson,et al.  Phased System Design, Development, and Implementation: Process and Technology , 1992, The Impact of Computer Supported Technologies in Information Systems Development.

[8]  Bas K. Brussaard,et al.  Information and Organization Policies in Public Administration , 1980, IFIP Congress.

[9]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Structure of Ill Structured Problems , 1973, Artif. Intell..

[10]  P. Lawrence,et al.  Organization and environment , 1967 .

[11]  Bjørn Gustavsen,et al.  Swedish Network Development for Implementing National Work Reform Strategy , 1993 .

[12]  Russell L. Ackoff,et al.  On purposeful systems , 1972 .

[13]  Tom R. Burns,et al.  The Management of Innovation. , 1963 .

[14]  C. Argyris.  Good communication that blocks learning , 1994 .

[15]  Douglas L. Dean,et al.  Reengineering with enterprise analyzer , 1993, [1993] Proceedings of the Twenty-sixth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[16]  John F. Rockart,et al.  Computers, networks, and the corporation , 1991 .

[17]  Graham Pervan.  A case for more case study research in group support systems , 1994, Business Process Re-Engineering.

[18]  Judy H. August.  Joint application design: the group session approach to system design , 1991 .

[19]  Peter F. Drucker,et al.  The new productivity challenge. , 1991 .

[20]  Donald A. Schön,et al.  Participatory Action Research and Action Science Compared , 1989 .

[21]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Experience at IBM with group support systems: A field study , 1989, Decis. Support Syst..

[22]  Richard C. Breeden.  The SEC fix on executive pay: Improved disclosure or intrusion? , 1993 .

[23]  Peter Checkland,et al.  Systems Thinking, Systems Practice , 1981 .

[24]  Michael Hammer,et al.  Reengineering Work: Don’t Automate, Obliterate , 1990 .

[25]  Lars Lundberg,et al.  Design for Change , 2001 .

[26]  Henk Sol,et al.  Prototyping: A Methodological Assessment , 1984 .

[27]  Thomas W. Malone,et al.  Modeling Coordination in Organizations and Markets , 1987 .

[28]  Peter F. Drucker,et al.  The Coming of the New Organization , 2001 .

[29]  Arthur B. VanGundy,et al.  Techniques of structured problem solving , 1981 .

[30]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  The Case Research Strategy in Studies of Information Systems , 1987, MIS Q..

[31]  Gert-Jan de Vreede,et al.  Why Some GSS Meetings Just Don't Work: Exploring Success Factors of Electronic Meetings , 1997, ECIS.

[32]  J. Sterman,et al.  Systems thinking and organizational learning: Acting locally and thinking globally in the organization of the future , 1992 .

[33]  G. Huber.  The Nature and Design of Post-Industrial Organizations , 1984 .

[34]  Brad Quinn Post,et al.  Building the business case for group support technology , 1992, Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[35]  C. Floyd.  A Systematic Look at Prototyping , 1984 .

[36]  J. Rockart.  Chief executives define their own data needs. , 1979, Harvard business review.

[37]  Alexander Verbraeck,et al.  Animating organizational processes Insight eases change , 1996, Simul. Pract. Theory.

[38]  Henk Sol,et al.  Simulation in information systems development. , 1982 .

[39]  Enid Mumford,et al.  Participative Systems Design , 1984, Comput. J..

[40]  Jay R. Galbraith.  Organization Design , 1977 .

[41]  Ortrun Zuber-Skerritt,et al.  Action Research for Change and Development , 2021 .

[42]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  The Structuring of Organizations , 1979 .

[43]  Gary W. Dickson,et al.  Problem solving for effective systems analysis: an experimental exploration , 1983, CACM.

[44]  Enid Mumford,et al.  Designing Human Systems For New Technology: The Ethics Method , 1983 .

[45]  Douglas R. Vogel,et al.  Technological Support for Group Process Modeling , 1994, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[46]  Gert-Jan de Vreede,et al.  Modeling and Simulating Organizational Coordination , 1998 .

[47]  R. Ackoff.  Towards a System of Systems Concepts , 1971 .

[48]  Peter Checkland,et al.  Soft Systems Methodology in Action , 1990 .

[49]  Frederick Betz,et al.  On Managing Science in the Systems Age: Two Schemas for the Study of Science as a Whole Systems Phenomenon , 1974 .