Analysis of domain motions in large proteins

We present a new approach for determining dynamical domains in large proteins, either based on a comparison of different experimental structures, or on a simplified normal mode calculation for a single conformation. In a first step, a deformation measure is evaluated for all residues in the protein; a high deformation indicates highly flexible interdomain regions. The sufficiently rigid parts of the protein are then classified into rigid domains and low‐deformation interdomain regions on the basis of their global motion. We demonstrate the techniques on three proteins: citrate synthase, which has been the subject of earlier domain analyses, HIV‐1 reverse transcriptase, which has a rather complex domain structure, and aspartate transcarbamylase as an example of a very large protein. These examples show that the comparison of conformations and the normal mode analysis lead to essentially the same domain identification, except for cases where the experimental conformations differ by the presence of a large ligand, such as a DNA strand. Normal mode analysis has the advantage of requiring only one experimental structure and of providing a more detailed picture of domain movements, e.g. the splitting of domains into subdomains at higher frequencies. Proteins 1999;34:369–382. © 1999 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  Nobuhiko Saitô,et al.  Tertiary Structure of Proteins. I. : Representation and Computation of the Conformations , 1972 .

[2]  G J Williams,et al.  The Protein Data Bank: a computer-based archival file for macromolecular structures. , 1978, Archives of biochemistry and biophysics.

[3]  R. Huber,et al.  Crystallographic refinement and atomic models of two different forms of citrate synthase at 2.7 and 1.7 A resolution. , 1984, Journal of molecular biology.

[4]  S J Remington,et al.  Citrate synthase: structure, control, and mechanism. , 1986, Annual review of biophysics and biophysical chemistry.

[5]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Algorithms for Clustering Data , 1988 .

[6]  Gerald R. Kneller,et al.  Superposition of molecular structures using quaternions , 1991 .

[7]  Georg E. Schulz,et al.  Domain motions in proteins , 1991, Current Biology.

[8]  Enoch S. Huang,et al.  Automatic and accurate method for analysis of proteins that undergo hinge-mediated domain and loop movements , 1993, Current Biology.

[9]  T. Steitz,et al.  Structural basis of asymmetry in the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 reverse transcriptase heterodimer. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  A. Lesk,et al.  Structural mechanisms for domain movements in proteins. , 1994, Biochemistry.

[11]  W. Lipscomb Aspartate transcarbamylase from Escherichia coli: activity and regulation. , 1994, Advances in enzymology and related areas of molecular biology.

[12]  T. Steitz,et al.  Comparison of three different crystal forms shows HIV-1 reverse transcriptase displays an internal swivel motion. , 1994, Structure.

[13]  L. Fetler,et al.  Unlike the quaternary structure transition, the tertiary structure change of the 240s loop in allosteric aspartate transcarbamylase requires active site saturation by substrate for completion. , 1995, Biochemistry.

[14]  G. Rose,et al.  Rigid domains in proteins: An algorithmic approach to their identification , 1995, Proteins.

[15]  P. Kollman,et al.  A Second Generation Force Field for the Simulation of Proteins, Nucleic Acids, and Organic Molecules J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 5179−5197 , 1996 .

[16]  Y. Sanejouand,et al.  Hinge‐bending motion in citrate synthase arising from normal mode calculations , 1995, Proteins.

[17]  P. Kollman,et al.  A Second Generation Force Field for the Simulation of Proteins, Nucleic Acids, and Organic Molecules , 1995 .

[18]  A. Thomas,et al.  Analysis of the low frequency normal modes of the T-state of aspartate transcarbamylase. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.

[19]  K Schulten,et al.  VMD: visual molecular dynamics. , 1996, Journal of molecular graphics.

[20]  H. Berendsen,et al.  Model‐free methods of analyzing domain motions in proteins from simulation: A comparison of normal mode analysis and molecular dynamics simulation of lysozyme , 1997, Proteins.

[21]  Oren M. Becker,et al.  Representing protein and peptide structures with parallel‐coordinates , 1997 .

[22]  David C. Jones,et al.  CATH--a hierarchic classification of protein domain structures. , 1997, Structure.

[23]  K Schulten,et al.  Protein domain movements: detection of rigid domains and visualization of hinges in comparisons of atomic coordinates , 1997, Proteins.

[24]  Konrad Hinsen The Molecular Modeling Toolkit: a case study of a large scientific application in Python , 1997 .

[25]  H. Berendsen,et al.  Domain motions in bacteriophage T4 lysozyme: A comparison between molecular dynamics and crystallographic data , 1998, Proteins.

[26]  K. Hinsen Analysis of domain motions by approximate normal mode calculations , 1998, Proteins.

[27]  H. Berendsen,et al.  Systematic analysis of domain motions in proteins from conformational change: New results on citrate synthase and T4 lysozyme , 1998, Proteins.