Maturation and the Evolution of Imitative Learning in Artificial Organisms

The traditional explanation of delayed maturation age, as part of an evolved life history, focuses on the increased costs of juvenile mortality due to early maturation. Prior quantitative models of these trade-offs, however, have addressed only morphological phenotypic traits, such as body size. We argue that the development of behavioral skills prior to reproductive maturity also constitutes an advantage of delayed maturation and thus should be included among the factors determining the trade-off for optimal age at maturity. Empirical support for this hypothesis from animal field studies is abundant. This article provides further evidence drawn from simulation experiments. Latent energy environments (LEE) are a class of tightly controlled environments in which learning organisms are modeled by neural networks and evolve according to a type of genetic algorithm. An advantage of this artificial world is that it becomes possible to discount all nonbehavioral costs of early maturity in order to focus exclusively on behavioral consequences. Despite large selective costs imposed on parental fitness due to prolonged immaturity, the optimal age at maturity is shown to be significantly delayed when offspring learn from their parents' behavior via imitation.

[1]  L. Darrell Whitley,et al.  Adding Learning to the Cellular Development of Neural Networks: Evolution and the Baldwin Effect , 1993, Evolutionary Computation.

[2]  Filippo Menczer,et al.  Latent energy environments , 1996 .

[3]  J. Baldwin A New Factor in Evolution , 1896, The American Naturalist.

[4]  Filippo Menczer,et al.  EVOLVING SENSORS IN ENVIRONMENTS OF CONTROLLED COMPLEXITY , 1994 .

[5]  Richard K. Belew,et al.  Evolving networks: using the genetic algorithm with connectionist learning , 1990 .

[6]  Charles E. Taylor,et al.  Artificial Life II , 1991 .

[7]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  How Learning Can Guide Evolution , 1996, Complex Syst..

[8]  Peter M. Todd,et al.  Parental Guidance Suggested: How Parental Imprinting Evolves Through Sexual Selection as an Adaptive Learning Mechanism , 1993, Adapt. Behav..

[9]  Kenneth A. De Jong,et al.  Generation Gaps Revisited , 1992, FOGA.

[10]  Richard K. Belew,et al.  Evolution, Learning, and Culture: Computational Metaphors for Adaptive Algorithms , 1990, Complex Syst..

[11]  T. Johnston Selective costs and benefits of in the evolution of learning , 1996 .

[12]  C. Waddington Canalization of Development and the Inheritance of Acquired Characters , 1942, Nature.

[13]  C. Lumsden Culture and the Evolutionary Process, Robert Boyd, Peter J. Richerson. University of Chicago Press, Chicago & London (1985), viii, +301. Price $29.95 , 1986 .

[14]  C. M. Lessells,et al.  The Evolution of Life Histories , 1994 .

[15]  David H. Ackley,et al.  Interactions between learning and evolution , 1991 .

[16]  M. Feldman,et al.  Cultural transmission and evolution: a quantitative approach. , 1981, Monographs in population biology.

[17]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Learning internal representations by error propagation , 1986 .

[18]  P. Richerson,et al.  Culture and the Evolutionary Process , 1988 .

[19]  Jeffrey L. Elman,et al.  Learning and Evolution in Neural Networks , 1994, Adapt. Behav..

[20]  Filippo Menczer Changing Latent Energy Environments: A Case for the Evolution of Plasticity , 1994 .