Invariants, Scaling Laws, and Ecological Complexity

There has been much debate about scaling laws in nature. It is believed that as body size increases the number of individuals in the population decreases. As Marquet explains in his Perspective, an elegant new study in two totally separate stream communities ( Schmid et al.) confirms that this scaling law holds across more than 400 species of invertebrates.

[1]  J. Damuth,et al.  Population density and body size in mammals , 1981, Nature.

[2]  R. Peters.  The Ecological Implications of Body Size , 1983 .

[3]  Robert M. May,et al.  The Search for Patterns in the Balance of Nature: Advances and Retreats , 1986 .

[4]  J. Damuth.  Interspecific allometry of population density in mammals and other animals: the independence of body mass and population energy‐use , 1987 .

[5]  J. Lawton.  What is the relationship between population density and body size in animals , 1989 .

[6]  Michael LaBarbera,et al.  ANALYZING BODY SIZE AS A FACTOR IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION , 1989 .

[7]  J. Castilla,et al.  Scaling Population Density to Body Size in Rocky Intertidal Communities , 1990, Science.

[8]  John H. Lawton,et al.  Species Richness and Population Dynamics of Animal Assemblages. Patterns in Body Size: Abundance Space , 1990 .

[9]  J. Damuth,et al.  Of size and abundance , 1991, Nature.

[10]  Gutti Jogesh Babu,et al.  Analytical and monte carlo comparisons of six different linear least squares fits , 1992 .

[11]  D. Griffiths,et al.  Size, abundance, and energy use in communities , 1992 .

[12]  P. Yodzis,et al.  Body Size and Consumer-Resource Dynamics , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[13]  M. Taper,et al.  Evolution of Body Size: Consequences of an Energetic Definition of Fitness , 1993, The American Naturalist.

[14]  K. Gaston,et al.  Animal body size distributions: patterns, mechanisms and implications. , 1994, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[15]  J. Castilla,et al.  Body size, population density, and the energetic equivalence rule , 1995 .

[16]  M. Taper,et al.  How do Species Really Divide Resources? , 1996, The American Naturalist.

[17]  David Tilman,et al.  Insect species diversity, abundance and body size relationships , 1996, Nature.

[18]  Pablo A. Marquet,et al.  The Introduced Hawaiian Avifauna Reconsidered: Evidence for Self-Organized Criticality? , 1996 .

[19]  K. Gaston,et al.  A critical assessment of the form of the interspecific relationship between abundance and body size in animals , 1997 .

[20]  James H. Brown,et al.  Allometric scaling of plant energetics and population density , 1998, Nature.

[21]  H. Eugene Stanley,et al.  Dynamics of North American breeding bird populations , 1998, Nature.

[22]  Johan Bollen,et al.  The evolution of complexity , 1999 .

[23]  James H. Brown,et al.  The fourth dimension of life: fractal geometry and allometric scaling of organisms. , 1999, Science.

[24]  J. Lawton.  Are there general laws in ecology , 1999 .

[25]  H. Olff,et al.  Spatial scaling laws yield a synthetic theory of biodiversity , 1999, Nature.

[26]  Kinzig,et al.  Self-similarity in the distribution and abundance of species , 1999, Science.

[27]  James H. Brown,et al.  Allometric scaling of production and life-history variation in vascular plants , 1999, Nature.

[28]  P. Schmid,et al.  Relation between population density and body size in stream communities. , 2000, Science.

[29]  Gunther J. Eble,et al.  The evolution of complexity , 2001, Complex..