Enhancement of Differentiation and Mineralisation of Osteoblast-like Cells by Degenerate Electrical Waveform in an In Vitro Electrical Stimulation Model Compared to Capacitive Coupling

Electrical stimulation (ES) is effective in enhancing bone healing, however the best electrical waveform, mode of application and mechanisms remains unclear. We recently reported the in vitro differential healing response of a novel electrical waveform called degenerate sine wave (DW) compared to other forms of ES. This study further explores this original observation on osteoblast cells. Here, we electrically stimulated SaOS-2 osteoblast-like cells with DW in an in vitro ES chamber (referred to as ‘DW stimulation’) and compared the intracellular effects to capacitive coupling (CC) stimulation. ES lasted for 4 h, followed by an incubation period of 20 h and subsequent ES for 4 additional hours. Cytotoxicity, proliferation, differentiation and mineralisation of the osteoblast-like cells were evaluated to determine the cell maturation process. DW significantly enhanced the differentiation of cells when compared to CC stimulation with increased alkaline phosphatase and collagen I gene expression by quantitative real time- polymerase chain reaction analysis (p<0.01). Moreover, DW significantly increased the mineralisation of cells compared to CC stimulation. Furthermore the transcription of osteocalcin, osteonectin, osteopontin and bone sialoprotein (p<0.05) was also up regulated by DW. However, ES did not augment the proliferation of cells. Translational analysis by immunocytochemistry and Western blotting showed increased collagen I, osteocalcin and osteonectin expression after DW than CC stimulation. In summary, we have demonstrated for the first time that DW stimulation in an in vitro ES chamber has a significant effect on maturation of osteoblast-like cells compared to CC stimulation of the same magnitude.

[1]  L. Jaffe Electrophoresis along cell membranes , 1977, Nature.

[2]  Hao Xu,et al.  Effects of PEMF and glucocorticoids on proliferation and differentiation of osteoblasts , 2012, Electromagnetic biology and medicine.

[3]  D. McGrouther,et al.  Treatment of symptomatic abnormal skin scars with electrical stimulation. , 2010, Journal of wound care.

[4]  A. Bayat,et al.  Acceleration of cutaneous healing by electrical stimulation: Degenerate electrical waveform down‐regulates inflammation, up‐regulates angiogenesis and advances remodeling in temporal punch biopsies in a human volunteer study , 2011, Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society.

[5]  Walter H. Chang,et al.  Pulsed electromagnetic fields affect osteoblast proliferation and differentiation in bone tissue engineering , 2007, Bioelectromagnetics.

[6]  A. Palmieri,et al.  Effects of Pulsed Electromagnetic Fields on Human Osteoblastlike Cells (MG-63): A Pilot Study , 2010, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[7]  Ardeshir Bayat,et al.  A novel in vitro assay for electrophysiological research on human skin fibroblasts: Degenerate electrical waves downregulate collagen I expression in keloid fibroblasts , 2011, Experimental dermatology.

[8]  G S Stein,et al.  Molecular mechanisms mediating proliferation/differentiation interrelationships during progressive development of the osteoblast phenotype. , 1993, Endocrine reviews.

[9]  J. King,et al.  A prospective, double-blind trial of electrical capacitive coupling in the treatment of non-union of long bones. , 1994, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[10]  Eiichi Fukada,et al.  On the Piezoelectric Effect of Bone , 1957 .

[11]  B. Ge,et al.  Effect of 3.6-mT sinusoidal electromagnetic fields on proliferation and differentiation of osteoblasts in vitro. , 2012, Zhongguo yi xue ke xue yuan xue bao. Acta Academiae Medicinae Sinicae.

[12]  C. Bassett,et al.  Treatment of therapeutically resistant non-unions with bone grafts and pulsing electromagnetic fields. , 1982, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[13]  U. Joos,et al.  Electrical stimulation influences mineral formation of osteoblast-like cells in vitro. , 2001, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[14]  M. Shamos,et al.  Piezoelectric Effect in Bone , 1963, Nature.

[15]  Ardeshir Bayat,et al.  Degenerate Wave and Capacitive Coupling Increase Human MSC Invasion and Proliferation While Reducing Cytotoxicity in an In Vitro Wound Healing Model , 2011, PloS one.

[16]  R. Cadossi,et al.  Electrical Stimulation of Human Femoral Intertrochanteric Osteotomies , 2015 .

[17]  T. Goto,et al.  Effects of Static Magnetic Fields on Bone Formation in Rat Osteoblast Cultures , 2003, Journal of dental research.

[18]  M. Pearcy,et al.  Timing of pulsed electromagnetic field stimulation does not affect the promotion of bone cell development , 2005, Bioelectromagnetics.

[19]  P. Shaman,et al.  Tibial Nonunion Treated With Direct Current, Capacitive Coupling, or Bone Graft , 1995, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[20]  R. Jensh,et al.  Rapid schedules for KOH clearing and alizarin red S staining of fetal rat bone. , 1966, Stain technology.

[21]  A. Bayat,et al.  Electrical Stimulation in Bone Healing: Critical Analysis by Evaluating Levels of Evidence , 2011, Eplasty.

[22]  V. Ferguson,et al.  The effects of pulsed electromagnetic fields on the cellular activity of SaOS‐2 cells , 2008, Bioelectromagnetics.

[23]  D. A. Hanson,et al.  Focal adhesion kinase: in command and control of cell motility , 2005, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[24]  G. Stein,et al.  Progressive development of the rat osteoblast phenotype in vitro: Reciprocal relationships in expression of genes associated with osteoblast proliferation and differentiation during formation of the bone extracellular matrix , 1990, Journal of cellular physiology.

[25]  R. Cadossi,et al.  Electrical stimulation of human femoral intertrochanteric osteotomies. Double-blind study. , 1988, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[26]  W. Sharrard,et al.  A double-blind trial of pulsed electromagnetic fields for delayed union of tibial fractures. , 1990, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[27]  Walter H. Chang,et al.  Effect of pulse‐burst electromagnetic field stimulation on osteoblast cell activities , 2004, Bioelectromagnetics.

[28]  L M Loew,et al.  Electric field-directed fibroblast locomotion involves cell surface molecular reorganization and is calcium independent , 1994, The Journal of cell biology.

[29]  K. Neoh,et al.  Combined effects of direct current stimulation and immobilized BMP‐2 for enhancement of osteogenesis , 2013, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[30]  F. Benazzo,et al.  Use of Capacitive Coupled Electric Fields in Stress Fractures in Athletes , 1995, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[31]  L. Bonewald,et al.  Von Kossa Staining Alone Is Not Sufficient to Confirm that Mineralization In Vitro Represents Bone Formation , 2003, Calcified Tissue International.

[32]  L. Bonewald,et al.  Pulsed electromagnetic fields affect phenotype and connexin 43 protein expression in MLO‐Y4 osteocyte‐like cells and ROS 17/2.8 osteoblast‐like cells , 2003, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[33]  H. Wiesmann,et al.  Capacitively coupled electric fields accelerate proliferation of osteoblast-like primary cells and increase bone extracellular matrix formation in vitro , 2000, European Biophysics Journal.

[34]  V. Denaro,et al.  Effect of pulsed electromagnetic fields on human osteoblast cultures. , 2013, Physiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy.

[35]  X. Huo,et al.  Effects of Extremely Low-Frequency-Pulsed Electromagnetic Field on Different-Derived Osteoblast-Like Cells , 2008, Electromagnetic biology and medicine.

[36]  R. Nuccitelli,et al.  Calcium channel blockers inhibit galvanotaxis in human keratinocytes , 2002, Journal of cellular physiology.

[37]  John R. Johnson,et al.  A double-blind study of capacitively coupled electrical stimulation as an adjunct to lumbar spinal fusions. , 1999, Spine.

[38]  P. Diniz,et al.  Effects of pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) stimulation on bone tissue like formation are dependent on the maturation stages of the osteoblasts , 2002, Bioelectromagnetics.

[39]  B. Boyan,et al.  Pulsed electromagnetic field stimulation of MG63 osteoblast‐like cells affects differentiation and local factor production , 2000, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[40]  T. He,et al.  Differentiation of Osteoprogenitor Cells Is Induced by High-Frequency Pulsed Electromagnetic Fields , 2012, The Journal of craniofacial surgery.

[41]  O. Wahlström Stimulation of fracture healing with electromagnetic fields of extremely low frequency (EMF of ELF). , 1984, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.