Optimal restoration: Accounting for space, time and uncertainty

Free to read on publisher website In general, conservation seeks to prevent further habitat loss but in many cases there is a need to reverse habitat degradation. Restoration of habitat is necessary to achieve biodiversity conservation goals but often it is a costly and time-intensive process. Prioritization of where and when habitat is restored can help to ensure the cost-effective delivery of desired outcomes. 2. We develop a restoration prioritization decision support tool to identify the combination of restoration sites and the schedule for their implementation most likely to deliver the greatest utility for a fixed budget and operational constraints. We use a case study to apply our prioritization approach in order to illustrate the data that can be employed to parameterise the analysis and the outputs that are able to inform restoration planning. We compare restoration schedules under alternative utility functions to demonstrate trade-offs associated with different objectives, assumptions and preferences for particular outcomes. 3. Our prioritization approach is spatially and temporally explicit and accounts for the costs and benefits of restoration, the likelihood of restoration success, the probability of stochastic events, feedbacks, time lags and spatial connectivity. 4. Through collaboration with restoration practitioners we derive quantitative and spatially explicit data on each site requiring restoration. We determine the relative priority for restoring each site and develop a restoration schedule over 20years. 5. Our results showed that after 20years a little over a half of the sites requiring restoration are likely be successfully restored, while the total expenditure at our site will be c. US13·7million - almost the entire budget of 14million. 6. Synthesis and applications. Our restoration prioritization approach provides a schedule for where and when restoration should occur, and also provides operational guidance and support for cost-effective restoration planning such as informing the likely total cost of restoration. © 2011 The Authors. Journal of Applied Ecology © 2011 British Ecological Society.

[1]  D. Lindenmayer,et al.  On the use of landscape surrogates as ecological indicators in fragmented forests , 2002 .

[2]  Neville D. Crossman,et al.  Systematic landscape restoration using integer programming , 2006 .

[3]  Truman P. Young,et al.  Restoration ecology and conservation biology , 2000 .

[4]  Richard J. Hobbs,et al.  Habitat Restoration—Do We Know What We’re Doing? , 2007 .

[5]  Carlos Carroll,et al.  Extinction Debt of Protected Areas in Developing Landscapes , 2004 .

[6]  Guillermo R. Giannico,et al.  Setting River Restoration Priorities: A Review of Approaches and a General Protocol for Identifying and Prioritizing Actions , 2008 .

[7]  Joy B. Zedler,et al.  Tracking Wetland Restoration: Do Mitigation Sites Follow Desired Trajectories? , 1999 .

[8]  Joy B. Zedler,et al.  Success: An Unclear, Subjective Descriptor of Restoration Outcomes , 2007, Ecological Restoration.

[9]  A. Huggett.  The concept and utility of ecological thresholds in biodiversity conservation , 2005 .

[10]  Koichi Takahashi,et al.  Effects of understory dwarf bamboo on soil water and the growth of overstory trees in a dense secondary Betula ermanii forest, northern Japan: Understory dwarf bamboo and overstory trees , 2003 .

[11]  E. Allen,et al.  Stability of exotic annual grasses following restoration efforts in southern California coastal sage scrub , 2008 .

[12]  E. Allen,et al.  Exotic Grass Competition in Suppressing Native Shrubland Re‐establishment , 1997 .

[13]  Gretchen C. Daily,et al.  Using return‐on‐investment to guide restoration: a case study from Hawaii , 2008 .

[14]  Richard J. Hobbs,et al.  Looking for the Silver Lining: Making the Most of Failure , 2009 .

[15]  J. Keeley,et al.  ALIEN PLANT DYNAMICS FOLLOWING FIRE IN MEDITERRANEAN-CLIMATE CALIFORNIA SHRUBLANDS , 2005 .

[16]  J. Todd Petty,et al.  An Ecologically Based Approach to Identifying Restoration Priorities in an Acid‐Impacted Watershed , 2005 .

[17]  Eve McDonald-Madden,et al.  Is conservation triage just smart decision making? , 2008, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[18]  H. Possingham,et al.  Spatial conservation prioritization: Quantitative methods and computational tools , 2009 .

[19]  A. Bennett,et al.  Where and when to revegetate: a quantitative method for scheduling landscape reconstruction. , 2009, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[20]  W. Jordan,et al.  Ecological restoration as a strategy for conserving biological diversity , 1988 .

[21]  Wayne M. Getz,et al.  The use of stochastic dynamic programming in optimal landscape reconstruction for metapopulations , 2003 .

[22]  N. Isaac,et al.  Mammals on the EDGE: Conservation Priorities Based on Threat and Phylogeny , 2007, PloS one.

[23]  Scott G. Leibowitz,et al.  A General Framework for Prioritizing Land Units for Ecological Protection and Restoration , 2000, Environmental management.

[24]  Hugh P Possingham,et al.  Setting Conservation Priorities , 2009, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[25]  Lenore Fahrig,et al.  EFFECT OF HABITAT FRAGMENTATION ON THE EXTINCTION THRESHOLD: A SYNTHESIS* , 2002 .

[26]  D. Richardson,et al.  Effects of Invasive Alien Plants on Fire Regimes , 2004 .

[27]  J. O'Leary,et al.  Regional disturbance effects on herb succession patterns in coastal sage scrub , 1988 .

[28]  Richard J. Hobbs,et al.  Triage: How do we prioritize health care for landscapes? , 2003 .

[29]  K. Gross,et al.  Alternative states and positive feedbacks in restoration ecology. , 2004, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[30]  Jacob McC. Overton,et al.  A landscape approach for estimating the conservation value of sites and site-based projects, with examples from New Zealand , 2008 .

[31]  J. Keeley,et al.  Fire Management Impacts on Invasive Plants in the Western United States , 2006, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[32]  D. A. Keith,et al.  Measuring Success: Evaluating the Restoration of a Grassy Eucalypt Woodland on the Cumberland Plain, Sydney, Australia , 2003 .

[33]  Atte Moilanen,et al.  Where and how to manage: Optimal selection of conservation actions for multiple species. , 2008 .

[34]  D. Macmillan,et al.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of woodland ecosystem restoration , 1998 .

[35]  Y. Ben-Haim.  Information-gap decision theory : decisions under severe uncertainty , 2001 .

[36]  H. Andrén,et al.  Effects of habitat fragmentation on birds and mammals in landscapes with different proportions of suitable habitat: a review , 1994 .

[37]  P. Kareiva,et al.  How Much Is Enough? The Recurrent Problem of Setting Measurable Objectives in Conservation , 2005 .

[38]  Young D. Choi.  Theories for ecological restoration in changing environment: Toward ‘futuristic’ restoration , 2004 .

[39]  Kevin J. Rice,et al.  Effects of Competition on Resource Availability and Growth of a California Bunchgrass , 1999 .