A combined sound field prediction method in small classrooms

In this paper, a new combination method for sound field prediction is proposed. An optimization approach based on the genetic algorithm is employed for optimizing the transition frequency of the combined sound field prediction method in classrooms. The selected optimization approach can identify the optimal transition frequency so that the combined sound field prediction can obtain more efficient and accurate prediction results. The proposed combined sound field prediction method consists of a wave-based method and geometric acoustic methods that are separated by the transition frequency. In low frequency domain (below the transition frequency), the sound field is calculated by the finite element method (FEM), while a hybrid geometric acoustic method is employed in the high frequency domain (above the transition frequency). The proposed combined prediction models are validated by comparing them with previous results and experimental measurements. The optimization approach is illustrated by several examples and compared with traditional combination results. Compared to existed sound field prediction simulations in classrooms, the proposed combination methods take the sound field in low frequencies into account. The results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed model. Practical applications: This study proposes a combined sound field prediction method separated by transition frequency. A genetic algorithm optimization method is employed for searching the optimal transition frequency. The outcomes of this paper are essential for acoustical designs and acoustical environmental assessments.

[1]  C. Mak,et al.  Modification of boundary condition for the optimization of natural frequencies of plate structures with fluid loading , 2018, Advances in Mechanical Engineering.

[3]  Cheuk Ming Mak,et al.  Effects of acoustical descriptors on speech intelligibility in Hong Kong classrooms , 2021 .

[4]  Murray Hodgson,et al.  Comparison of Predicted, Measured and Auralized Sound Fields with Respect to Speech Intelligibility in Classrooms Using CATT-Acoustic and ODEON , 2008 .

[5]  Jun Yang,et al.  Prediction of flow-generated noise produced by an in-duct spoiler in a ventilation system using CIBSE Guide B5 methods , 2009 .

[6]  Arianna Astolfi,et al.  Comparison between measured and calculated parameters for the acoustical characterization of small classrooms , 2008 .

[7]  Ying Wang,et al.  A hybrid technique based on combining ray tracing and FDTD methods for site-specific modeling of indoor radio wave propagation , 2000 .

[8]  Maarten van Walstijn,et al.  Room Acoustics Simulation Using 3-D Compact Explicit FDTD Schemes , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing.

[9]  D. Yang,et al.  An investigation of speech intelligibility for second language students in classrooms , 2018 .

[10]  Michael Vorländer,et al.  Combined wave and ray based room acoustic simulations of small rooms : [challenges and limitations on the way to realistic simulation results] , 2012 .

[11]  Jian Kang,et al.  Comparisons between simulated and in-situ measured speech intelligibility based on (binaural) room impulse responses , 2015 .

[12]  E. Premat,et al.  A new boundary-element method for predicting outdoor sound propagation and application to the case of a sound barrier in the presence of downward refraction , 2000 .

[13]  R. Dragonetti,et al.  Errors when assuming locally reacting boundary condition in the estimation of the surface acoustic impedance , 2017 .

[14]  Murray Hodgson,et al.  Validation of the Auralization Technique : Comparative Speech-Intelligibility Tests in Real and Virtual Classrooms , 2007 .

[15]  Dorothea Heiss-Czedik,et al.  An Introduction to Genetic Algorithms. , 1997, Artificial Life.

[16]  Cheuk Ming Mak,et al.  The effect of sound on office productivity , 2012 .

[17]  M. Schroeder,et al.  On Frequency Response Curves in Rooms. Comparison of Experimental, Theoretical, and Monte Carlo Results for the Average Frequency Spacing between Maxima , 1962 .

[18]  Mendel Kleiner,et al.  Auralization-An Overview , 1993 .

[19]  Cheuk Ming Mak,et al.  An extended neck versus a spiral neck of the Helmholtz resonator , 2017 .

[21]  Cheuk Ming Mak,et al.  Recent advances in building acoustics: An overview of prediction methods and their applications , 2015 .

[22]  J. Jeon,et al.  Acoustic evaluation of orchestra occupancies in concert halls: Effect of sound absorption by orchestra members on audience acoustics , 2018, Building and Environment.

[23]  C. Mak,et al.  Optimization of natural frequencies of a plate structure by modifying boundary conditions. , 2017, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[24]  Chenzhi Cai,et al.  Noise control zone for a periodic ducted Helmholtz resonator system. , 2016, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[25]  Cheuk Ming Mak,et al.  Sustainable noise control system design for building ventilation systems , 2015 .

[26]  Lauri Savioja,et al.  Overview of geometrical room acoustic modeling techniques. , 2015, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[27]  Yasushi Shimizu,et al.  Assessing the accuracy of auralizations computed using a hybrid geometrical‐acoustics and wave‐acoustics method , 2004 .