Extraction of the hemodynamic response in randomized event-related functional MRI

Signal detection in a noisy data set is a common problem in signal processing. Detection of the hemodynamic response function (HRF) embedded in randomized event-related fMRI (rER-fMRI) time series is an example of this problem. So far, most studies that set out to obtain unbiased HRF use some forms of time-window (TW) averaging method to extract HRF from the rER-fMRI data. In this paper we applied two methods, cepstral analysis and conjugate gradients (CG) for deconvolution to extract HRF. These methods depend only on the knowledge of when events occurred and do not require any a priori information about the HRF. These methods and the popular TW averaging method are tested on simulated data, as well as in vivo data obtained from rER-fMRI experiments. All three methods identified timing of HRF accurately, but only the CG for deconvolution method was robust in reproducing the shape under varying experimental conditions.

[1]  Stefan Pollmann,et al.  Use of Short Intertrial Intervals in Single-Trial Experiments: A 3T fMRI-Study , 1998, NeuroImage.

[2]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Nonlinear event‐related responses in fMRI , 1998, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[3]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Human Brain Function , 1997 .

[4]  A M Dale,et al.  Optimal experimental design for event‐related fMRI , 1999, Human brain mapping.

[5]  James G. Nagy,et al.  Iterative image restoration using approximate inverse preconditioning , 1996, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[6]  D. Heeger,et al.  Linear Systems Analysis of Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Human V1 , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[7]  A M Dale,et al.  Event-related functional MRI: past, present, and future. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  A. Dale,et al.  Selective averaging of rapidly presented individual trials using fMRI , 1997, Human brain mapping.