Impact of ICT and Human Skills on the European Financial Intermediation Sector

This paper investigates the impact of ICT- and non-ICT capital, and of labour at different skill levels, on productivity and employment in the financial intermediation sector of twelve EU member countries plus the US and Japan. A stochastic possibility frontiers (SPF) approach is applied to assess the relation between the production inputs and to compute both time-varying and average inefficiencies. For the empirical analysis, annual data from 1995 to 2005 are employed that were obtained from recently released data contained in the EU KLEMS database. The results obtained shed some light on the relative impact of ICT- and non-ICT capital and labour inputs, and provide new insights about the structural dynamics between these factor inputs. We find that the financial sectors in the twelve EU member states studied are quite similar in terms of efficiency, and that efficiency and productivity depends much more on human capital than on physical capital. We conclude that learning-by-doing and learning-by-using are more decisive elements in shaping the productivity growth path than ICT investment alone, which can leave managers and employees overwhelmed by the complexity and needs of structural adjustments in the companies' organisation.

[1]  William H. Greene,et al.  Reconsidering heterogeneity in panel data estimators of the stochastic frontier model , 2005 .

[2]  J. M. Pastor,et al.  An Efficiency Comparison of European Banking Systems Operating under Different Environmental Conditions , 2002 .

[3]  M. Farrell.  The Measurement of Productive Efficiency , 1957 .

[4]  G. Bush.  Economic Report of the President , 2001 .

[5]  W. Greene.  Fixed and Random Effects in Stochastic Frontier Models , 2002 .

[6]  Mary O'Mahony,et al.  EU Productivity and Competitiveness: An Industry Perspective Can Europe Resume the Catching-up Process? , 2003 .

[7]  S. Caudill,et al.  Biases in frontier estimation due to heteroscedasticity , 1993 .

[8]  R. Madlener,et al.  Nested Stochastic Possibility Frontiers with Heterogeneous Capital Inputs , 2007 .

[9]  K. Arrow.  The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing , 1962 .

[10]  D. Jorgenson,et al.  Raising the Speed Limit: U.S. Economic Growth in the Information Age , 2000 .

[11]  Tim Coelli,et al.  A Guide to Frontier version 4. 1: A Computer Program for Stochastic Frontier Production and Cost Fu , 1996 .

[12]  S. Kumbhakar,et al.  Efficiency measurement using a latent class stochastic frontier model , 2004 .

[13]  K. Arrow,et al.  Capital-labor substitution and economic efficiency , 1961 .

[14]  G. Battese,et al.  Frontier production functions, technical efficiency and panel data: With application to paddy farmers in India , 1992 .

[15]  Joan V. Robinson,et al.  The Nature of the Firm , 2004 .

[16]  K. Stiroh.  Information Technology and the U.S. Productivity Revival: What Do the Industry Data Say? , 2001 .

[17]  D. Aigner,et al.  FORMULATION AND ESTIMATION OF STOCHASTIC PRODUCTION FUNCTION MODELS , 1977 .

[18]  T. C. Edens,et al.  Economic Growth , 1957, The Journal of Economic History.

[19]  Mary O'Mahony,et al.  EU KLEMS Growth and Productivity Accounts: An Overview , 2007 .

[20]  S. Kumbhakar,et al.  Estimation of growth convergence using a stochastic production frontier approach , 2005 .

[21]  Mary O'Mahony,et al.  The productivity gap between Europe and the United States : Trends and causes , 2008 .

[22]  R. R. Russell,et al.  Technological Change, Technological Catch-up, and Capital Deepening: Relative Contributions to Growth and Convergence , 2002 .