Abnormal processing of temporal fine structure in speech for frequencies where absolute thresholds are normal.

The identification of nonsense syllables that were lowpass filtered at 1.5 kHz was compared for subjects with normal hearing and subjects with mild-to-severe hearing loss at high frequencies but with normal or near-normal hearing at low frequencies. Absolute thresholds were mostly within the normal range (<20 dB hearing level) for both groups for frequencies below 1.5 kHz. Performance was assessed with intact speech, speech that had been processed to preserve only temporal envelope cues in a few frequency bands (E speech), and speech that had been processed to remove envelope cues as far as possible while preserving temporal fine structure cues, again in a few frequency bands (TFS speech). For the intact speech and E speech, the hearing-impaired subjects performed slightly more poorly than the normal-hearing subjects, but this effect was significant only for the intact speech. For the TFS speech, the hearing-impaired subjects performed significantly more poorly than the normal-hearing subjects, with 12 out of 16 of the former performing at chance. The results indicate that, for people with hearing loss at medium to high frequencies, the processing of the TFS of speech can be degraded for frequencies where absolute thresholds are within the normal range.

[1]  Brian C J Moore,et al.  Speech perception problems of the hearing impaired reflect inability to use temporal fine structure , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[2]  Brian C J Moore,et al.  Effects of moderate cochlear hearing loss on the ability to benefit from temporal fine structure information in speech. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  Jayne B Ahlstrom,et al.  Recognition of low-pass-filtered consonants in noise with normal and impaired high-frequency hearing. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  C Trahiotis,et al.  Discrimination of interaural temporal disparities by normal-hearing listeners and listeners with high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  R V Shannon,et al.  Speech Recognition with Primarily Temporal Cues , 1995, Science.

[6]  Laurent Demany,et al.  Consequences of cochlear damage for the detection of interaural phase differences. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  Deniz Başkent,et al.  Speech recognition in normal hearing and sensorineural hearing loss as a function of the number of spectral channels. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  Brian R Glasberg,et al.  Derivation of auditory filter shapes from notched-noise data , 1990, Hearing Research.

[9]  Christian Lorenzi,et al.  Effects of periodic interruptions on the intelligibility of speech based on temporal fine-structure or envelope cues. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  Christian Lorenzi,et al.  The ability of listeners to use recovered envelope cues from speech fine structure. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  C W Turner,et al.  Use of temporal envelope cues in speech recognition by normal and hearing-impaired listeners. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.