ECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT AND THE CONSERVATION OF AQUATIC BIODWERSITY AND ECOLOGICAL INTEGRITY

: Ecologically effective ecosystem management will require the development of a robust logic, rationale, and framework for addressing the inherent limitations of scientific understanding. It must incorporate a strategy for avoiding irreversible or large-scale environmental mistakes that arise from social and political forces that tend to promote fragmented, uncritical, short-sighted, inflexible, and overly optimistic assessments of resource status, management capabilities, and the consequences of decisions and policies. Aquatic resources are vulnerable to the effects of human activities catchment-wide, and many of the landscape changes humans routinely induce cause irreversible damage (e.g., some species introductions, extinctions of ecotypes and species) or give rise to cumulative, long-term, large-scale biological and cultural consequences (e.g., accelerated erosion and sedimentation, deforestation, toxic contamination of sediments). In aquatic ecosystems, biotic impoverishment and environmental disruption caused by past management and natural events profoundly constrain the ability of future management to maintain biodiversity and restore historical ecosystem functions and values. To provide for rational, adaptive progress in ecosystem management and to reduce the risk of irreversible and unanticipated consequences, managers and scientists must identify catchments and aquatic networks where ecological integrity has been least damaged by prior management, and jointly develop means to ensure their protection as reservoirs of natural biodiversity, keystones for regional restoration, management models, monitoring benchmarks, and resources for ecological research.

[1]  Danny C. Lee,et al.  Consideration of extinction risks for salmonids , 1993 .

[2]  I. Schlosser,et al.  Stream Fish Ecology: A Landscape PerspectiveLand use, which influences the terrestrial-aquatic interface, can affect fish populations and their community dynamics , 1991 .

[3]  A. Sheldon.  Conservation of Stream Fishes: Patterns of Diversity, Rarity, and Risk , 1988 .

[4]  R. M. Rice,et al.  Modeling the Cumulative Watershed Effects of Forest Management Strategies , 1991 .

[5]  H. Regier,et al.  Ecosystem Science for the Great Lakes: Perspectives on Degradaiive and Rehabilitative Transformations , 1987 .

[6]  M. Soulé,et al.  Conservation: tactics for a constant crisis. , 1991, Science.

[7]  A. J. Underwood,et al.  Ecological Research and (and Research into) Environmental Management , 1995 .

[8]  R. E. Grumbine.  What Is Ecosystem Management , 1994 .

[9]  C. Frissell,et al.  A hierarchical framework for stream habitat classification: Viewing streams in a watershed context , 1986 .

[10]  C. Walters,et al.  Uncertainty, resource exploitation, and conservation: lessons from history. , 1993, Science.

[11]  Don E. McAllister,et al.  Fishes of North America Endangered, Threatened, or of Special Concern: 1989 , 1979 .

[12]  Mark E. Jensen,et al.  ECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT: A LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY PERSPECTWE1 , 1996 .

[13]  D. Bradford,et al.  Isolation of Remaining Populations of the Native Frog, Rana muscosa, by Introduced Fishes in Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks, California , 1993 .

[14]  Robert Newbury,et al.  Environmental Impact Prediction and Assessment: the Southern Indian Lake Experience , 1984 .

[15]  J. Lichatowich,et al.  Pacific Salmon at the Crossroads: Stocks at Risk from California, Oregon, Idaho, and Washington , 1991 .

[16]  Thomas R. Stanley,et al.  Ecosystem management and the arrogance of humanism , 1995 .

[17]  A. Fitzsimmons.  Sound policy or smoke and mirrors : Does ecosystem management make sense ? , 1996 .

[18]  From New Perspectives to Ecosystem Management: Response to Frissell et al. and Lawrence and Murphy , 1992 .

[19]  Alexander S. Flecker,et al.  Biodiversity conservation in running waters , 1993 .

[20]  Gordon E. Grant,et al.  WATERSHED ANALYSIS AS A FRAMEWORK FOR IMPLEMENTING ECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT , 1995 .

[21]  Charles A. S. Hall,et al.  AN ASSESSMENT OF SEVERAL OF THE HISTORICALLY MOST INFLUENTIAL THEORETICAL MODELS USED IN ECOLOGY AND OF THE DATA PROVIDED IN THEIR SUPPORT , 1988 .

[22]  P. Moyle,et al.  Protection of Aquatic Biodiversity in California: A Five-tiered Approach , 1994 .

[23]  C. Frissell,et al.  Topology of Extinction and Endangerment of Native Fishes in the Pacific Northwest and California (U.S.A.) , 1993 .

[24]  Richard E. Sparks,et al.  Need for Ecosystem Management of Large Rivers and Their Floodplains These phenomenally productive ecosystems produce fish and wildlife and preserve species , 1995 .

[25]  J. Karr.  Biological Integrity: A Long-Neglected Aspect of Water Resource Management. , 1991, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[26]  Murdoch K. McAllister,et al.  Experimental Design in the Management of Fisheries: A Review , 1992 .

[27]  G. Niemi,et al.  Recovery of lotic communities and ecosystems from disturbance—A narrative review of case studies , 1990 .

[28]  J. Sedell,et al.  An Ecosystem Approach to the Conservation and Management of Freshwater Habitat for Anadromous Salmonids in the Pacific Northwest , 1992 .