Network modelling methodologies in the digital humanities have been be used to advance inquiry in a variety of areas—most commonly those having to do with correspondence, citation, and social media networks. While new technologies have made generating high-quality and even dynamic network visualizations relatively easy, key challenges remain for humanities researchers. Many common objects of humanistic inquiry, such as literary, historiographic, and biographical texts are often not easily transformed into the kinds of data structures necessary for network visualization. The Transparency to Visibility (T2V) Project was initiated to develop new methods and toolkits that can support humanistic researchers who need to extract relationship data from unstructured texts to support network visualization. The T2V team used bioethics accountability statements to pilot and evaluate different methods for extracting relationship data. The resulting machine-learning-enhanced natural language processing (NLP) and metadata-assisted approaches offer promising potential pathways for contemporary digital humanities and future toolkit development. Funding statement: Funding was provided by a National Endowment for the Humanities Digital Humanities Advancement grant (HAA-261070).
[1]
Terry K Koo,et al.
A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research.
,
2016,
Journal Chiropractic Medicine.
[2]
R. Altman,et al.
PharmGKB summary: ivacaftor pathway, pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics
,
2017,
Pharmacogenetics and genomics.
[3]
Zoltan P. Majdik,et al.
Relationships among commercial practices and author conflicts of interest in biomedical publishing
,
2020,
PloS one.
[4]
D. Cicchetti.
Guidelines, Criteria, and Rules of Thumb for Evaluating Normed and Standardized Assessment Instruments in Psychology.
,
1994
.
[5]
Maria Cristina Pattuelli,et al.
Semantic network edges: a human-machine approach to represent typed relations in social networks
,
2015,
J. Knowl. Manag..
[6]
J. Bartko.
The Intraclass Correlation Coefficient as a Measure of Reliability
,
1966,
Psychological reports.