Activatable Tiles: Compact, Robust Programmable Assembly and Other Applications

While algorithmic DNA self-assembly is, in theory, capable of forming complex patterns, its experimental demonstration has been limited by significant assembly errors. In this paper we describe a novel protection/deprotection strategy to strictly enforce the direction of tiling assembly growth to ensure the robustness of the assembly process. Tiles are initially inactive, meaning that each tile's output pads are protected and cannot bind with other tiles. After other tiles bind to the tile's input pads, the tile transitions to an active state and its output pads are exposed, allowing further growth. We prove that an activatable tile set is an instance of a compact, error-resilient and self-healing tile-set. We also describe a DNA design for activatable tiles and a deprotection mechanism using DNA polymerase enzymes and strand displacement. We conclude with a discussion on some applications of activatable tiles beyond computational tiling.

[1]  Sudheer Sahu,et al.  Compact Error-Resilient Computational DNA Tiling Assemblies , 2004, DNA.

[2]  J. Reif,et al.  Construction, analysis, ligation, and self-assembly of DNA triple crossover complexes , 2000 .

[3]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[4]  Erik Winfree,et al.  Programmable Control of Nucleation for Algorithmic Self-assembly , 2004, DNA.

[5]  Ashish Goel,et al.  Error Free Self-assembly Using Error Prone Tiles , 2004, DNA.

[6]  Erik Winfree,et al.  Proofreading Tile Sets: Error Correction for Algorithmic Self-Assembly , 2003, DNA.

[7]  R. Warner,et al.  Kinetics of branch migration in double-stranded DNA. , 1976, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  Sudheer Sahu,et al.  Capabilities and Limits of Compact Error Resilience Methods for Algorithmic Self-assembly in Two and Three Dimensions , 2006, DNA.

[9]  E. Winfree Simulations of Computing by Self-Assembly , 1998 .

[10]  M. Sahani,et al.  Algorithmic Self-Assembly of DNA , 2006 .

[11]  Erik Winfree,et al.  Two computational primitives for algorithmic self-assembly: copying and counting. , 2005, Nano letters.

[12]  C R Cantor,et al.  PCR amplification of megabase DNA with tagged random primers (T-PCR). , 1993, Nucleic acids research.

[13]  C. Escarmís,et al.  Figure-8 configuration of dimers of S13 and phiX174 replicative form DNA. , 1975, Journal of molecular biology.

[14]  N. Seeman,et al.  Design and self-assembly of two-dimensional DNA crystals , 1998, Nature.

[15]  David I. Lewin,et al.  DNA computing , 2002, Comput. Sci. Eng..

[16]  E. Winfree,et al.  Algorithmic Self-Assembly of DNA Sierpinski Triangles , 2004, PLoS biology.

[17]  Erik Winfree,et al.  Complexity of Self-Assembled Shapes , 2004, SIAM J. Comput..

[18]  Hao Wang Proving theorems by pattern recognition — II , 1961 .

[19]  Ashish Goel,et al.  Running time and program size for self-assembled squares , 2001, STOC '01.

[20]  J. Reif,et al.  DNA-Templated Self-Assembly of Protein Arrays and Highly Conductive Nanowires , 2003, Science.

[21]  R. Rosenfeld Nature , 2009, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[22]  David R. Liu,et al.  Efficient and sequence-specific DNA-templated polymerization of peptide nucleic acid aldehydes. , 2003, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[23]  Robert M. Dirks,et al.  Triggered amplification by hybridization chain reaction. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[24]  Satoshi Murata,et al.  A Method of Error Suppression for Self-assembling DNA Tiles , 2004, DNA.