RETRACTED: WHAT DETERMINES SEX ROLES IN MATE SEARCHING?: SEX ROLES IN MATE SEARCHING

[1]  H. Kokko,et al.  WHEN NOT TO AVOID INBREEDING , 2006, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[2]  C. Wiklund,et al.  Mating system evolution in response to search costs in the speckled wood butterfly, Pararge aegeria , 1999, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[3]  It takes two to tango , 2003 .

[4]  L. Simmons,et al.  Parental investment and the control of sexual selection: predicting the direction of sexual competition , 1996, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[5]  A. Kaitala,et al.  The evolution of repeated mating under sexual conflict , 2005, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[6]  C. E. Derivera.  Long searches for male-defended breeding burrows allow female fiddler crabs, Uca crenulata, to release larvae on time , 2005, Animal Behaviour.

[7]  J. Byers,et al.  A Large Cost of Female Mate Sampling in Pronghorn , 2005, The American Naturalist.

[8]  N. Davies,et al.  Competitive mate searching in male common toads, Bufo bufo , 1979, Animal Behaviour.

[9]  M. Blows.  Interaction between natural and sexual selection during the evolution of mate recognition , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[10]  SEXUAL CONFLICT AND SEXUAL SELECTION: LOST IN THE CHASE , 2004, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[11]  A. Houston,et al.  State-dependent life histories , 1996, Nature.

[12]  M. Petrie,et al.  Why do females mate multiply? A review of the genetic benefits , 2000, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[13]  F. Gōtmark.  Conspicuous Coloration in Male Birds is Favoured by Predation in Some Species and Disfavoured in Others , 1993 .

[14]  P. Backwell,et al.  Male-biased predation of a fiddler crab , 2001, Animal Behaviour.

[15]  F. Weissing,et al.  Seasonal Sex Ratio Trend in the European Kestrel: An Evolutionarily Stable Strategy Analysis , 1999, The American Naturalist.

[16]  A. Houston,et al.  The Common Currency for Behavioral Decisions , 1986, The American Naturalist.

[17]  M. Kondoh,et al.  Male–female evolutionary game on mate‐locating behaviour and evolution of mating systems in insects , 2000 .

[18]  N. Okuda.  Female mating strategy and male brood cannibalism in a sand-dwelling cardinalfish , 1999, Animal Behaviour.

[19]  Kokko,et al.  Predicting the direction of sexual selection , 2001 .

[20]  J. Mappes,et al.  SEXUAL SELECTION WHEN FERTILIZATION IS NOT GUARANTEED , 2005, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[21]  J. Macedonia,et al.  Predation cost of conspicuous male coloration in collared lizards (Crotaphytus collaris) : An experimental test using clay-covered model lizards , 2006 .

[22]  T. H. Glutton-Brock,et al.  Sexual selection and the potential reproductive rates of males and females , 1991, Nature.

[23]  N. Owen‐Smith,et al.  Age, size, dominance and reproduction among male kudus: mating enhancement by attrition of rivals , 1993, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[24]  D. Gwynne,et al.  Sex-biased predation and the risky mate-locating behaviour of male tick-tock cicadas (Homoptera: Cicadidae) , 1987, Animal Behaviour.

[25]  T. Dobzhansky,et al.  INDETERMINATE OUTCOME OF CERTAIN EXPERIMENTS ON DROSOPHILA POPULATIONS , 1953 .

[26]  K. Wells.  The social behaviour of anuran amphibians , 1977, Animal Behaviour.

[27]  G. Allen,et al.  Sexual Selection Under Scramble Competition: Mate Location and Mate Choice in the Eucalypt Leaf Beetle Chrysophtharta agricola (Chapuis) in the Field , 2004, Journal of Insect Behavior.

[28]  Luc F. Bussière,et al.  High-quality male field crickets invest heavily in sexual display but die young , 2004, Nature.

[29]  H. Kokko,et al.  Dynamics of the Caring Family , 2003, The American Naturalist.

[30]  D. Levitan.  Density‐Dependent Sexual Selection in External Fertilizers: Variances in Male and Female Fertilization Success along the Continuum from Sperm Limitation to Sexual Conflict in the Sea Urchin Strongylocentrotus franciscanus , 2004, The American Naturalist.

[31]  Alasdair I Houston,et al.  A self-consistent approach to paternity and parental effort. , 2002, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[32]  A. Bateman,et al.  Intra-sexual selection in Drosophila , 1948, Heredity.

[33]  L. A. Whittingham,et al.  Search costs influence the spatial distribution, but not the level, of extra-pair mating in tree swallows , 2006, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[34]  C. Wiklund,et al.  Decoupling of reproductive rates and parental expenditure in a polyandrous butterfly , 1998 .

[35]  A. Qvarnström,et al.  PUTTING SEXUAL TRAITS INTO THE CONTEXT OF AN ORGANISM: A LIFE-HISTORY PERSPECTIVE IN STUDIES OF SEXUAL SELECTION , 2002 .

[36]  Ilkka Hanski,et al.  Allee effect and population dynamics in the Glanville fritillary butterfly , 1998 .

[37]  P. Wickman,et al.  The evolution of mating dispersion in insects , 1999 .

[38]  Jochen Zeil,et al.  Sexual dimorphism in the visual system of flies: The compound eyes and neural superposition in bibionidae (Diptera) , 1983, Journal of comparative physiology.

[39]  M. Kasumovic,et al.  Risky mate search and mate preference in the golden orb-web spider (Nephila plumipes) , 2007 .

[40]  Jeffrey R. Lucas,et al.  On Alternative Reproductive Tactics in Anurans: Dynamic Games with Density and Frequency Dependence , 1995, The American Naturalist.

[41]  P. Brownell,et al.  Evidence of Mate Trailing in the Giant Hairy Desert Scorpion, Hadrurus arizonensis (Scorpionida, Iuridae) , 2004, Journal of Insect Behavior.

[42]  K. Reinhold,et al.  The Resource-Based Mating System of the Mediterranean Pollen Wasp Ceramius fonscolombei Latreille 1810 (Hymenoptera, Vespidae, Masarinae) , 2004, Journal of Insect Behavior.

[43]  A. Houston,et al.  John Maynard Smith and the importance of consistency in evolutionary game theory , 2006 .

[44]  Peter D. Taylor,et al.  Allele-Frequency Change in a Class-Structured Population , 1990, The American Naturalist.

[45]  Alasdair I. Houston,et al.  Multiple patterns of parental care , 1999, Animal Behaviour.

[46]  Kuno Kirschfeld,et al.  The Dorsal Compound Eye of Simuliid Flies: , 1976 .

[47]  T. U. Grafe,et al.  Costs and benefits of mate choice in the lek-breeding reed frog, Hyperolius marmoratus , 1997, Animal Behaviour.

[48]  Richard D. Alexander,et al.  NATURAL SELECTION AND SPECIALIZED CHORUSING BEHAVIOR IN ACOUSTICAL INSECTS , 1975 .

[49]  Bill S Hansson,et al.  Extreme sensitivity in an olfactory system. , 2003, Chemical senses.

[50]  D. Rankin,et al.  Lonely hearts or sex in the city? Density-dependent effects in mating systems , 2006, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[51]  H. Kokko,et al.  Unifying and Testing Models of Sexual Selection , 2006 .

[52]  Michael D Greenfield.  Symposium: Insect Behavioral Ecology--'80: Moth Sex Pheromones: An Evolutionary Perspective , 1981 .

[53]  I. Owens,et al.  Conspicuous males suffer higher predation risk: visual modelling and experimental evidence from lizards , 2003, Animal Behaviour.

[54]  L. Acharya.  Sex-biased predation on moths by insectivorous bats , 1995, Animal Behaviour.

[55]  J. Roberts,et al.  Intrasexual selection and group spawning in quacking frogs (Crinia georgiana) , 2004 .

[56]  G. Jumper,et al.  Location by Olfaction: A Model and Application to the Mating Problem in the Deep-Sea Hatchetfish Argyropelecus hemigymnus , 1991, The American Naturalist.

[57]  T. Baker,et al.  Sexual Communication with Pheromones , 1984 .

[58]  M. Svensson.  SEXUAL SELECTION IN MOTHS: THE ROLE OF CHEMICAL COMMUNICATION , 1996 .

[59]  R. T. Cardé,et al.  Mate location strategies of gypsy moths in dense populations , 2004, Journal of Chemical Ecology.

[60]  P. Backwell,et al.  Density affects female and male mate searching in the fiddler crab, Uca beebei , 2002, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[61]  P. Wickman,et al.  An estimate of female mate searching costs in the lekking butterfly Coenonympha pamphilus , 1997, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[62]  A. Houston,et al.  Conflict between parents over care. , 2005, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[63]  D. McDonald.  Demographic consequences of sexual selection in the long-tailed manakin , 1993 .

[64]  T. Clutton‐Brock,et al.  Potential Reproductive Rates and the Operation of Sexual Selection , 1992, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[65]  D. Queller.  Why do females care more than males? , 1997, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[66]  G. Gries,et al.  Size‐ and density‐dependent reproductive success of bagworms, Metisa plana , 1999 .

[67]  L. Dill,et al.  Predation on females or males: who pays for bright male traits? , 1995, Animal Behaviour.