RIEP: Regional integrated energy plan

The energy planning endeavours for a particular region involves the finding of a set of sources and conversion devices so as to meet the energy requirement/demand of all the tasks in an optimal manner. This optimality depends on the objective to minimise the total annual cost of energy and the dependence on non-local resources or maximise the overall system efficiency. Factors such as availability of resources in the region and task energy requirements impose constraints on the regional energy planning exercise. Thus, regional energy planning turns out to be a constrained optimisation problem. This paper describes an optimum energy allocation using integrated energy planning approaches for Uttara Kannada district and makes a satisfying energy allocation plan for the years 2005, 2010 and 2015. Integrated energy planning gives an optimal mix of new/conventional energy sources and is developed based on decision support systems (DSS) approach. The central theme of the energy planning at decentralised level would be to prepare regional energy plans to meet energy needs and development of alternate energy sources at least- cost to the economy and environment. Regional integrated energy planning (RIEP) mechanism takes into account various available resources and demands in a region. This implies that the assessment of the demand supply and its intervention in the energy system, which may appear desirable due to such exercises, must be at a similar geographic scale. Regional energy planning exercises need to be flexible (to cope with rapidly changing energy systems) and easy to use. The application of DSS is a new approach to this problem. Towards the goal of implementing analytical methods for integrated planning, computerised decision-system provides useful assistance in the analyses of available information, the projection of future conditions, and the evaluation of alternative scenarios. Some of the features of DSS found particularly useful in regional energy planning are: (i) flexible structure—allows appropriate feasible levels of disaggregation, (ii) integrated nature—promotes a better overall understanding of many processes and concepts involved in planning, allowing planners to concentrate on specific energy subsectors, and (iii) iterative nature and easy scenario testing features—provide guidance in optimising data collection activities. Regional integrated energy plan (RIEP) is a computer-assisted accounting and simulation tool being developed to assist policy makers and planners at district and state level in evaluating energy policies and develop ecologically sound, sustainable energy plans. Energy availability and demand situation are projected for various scenarios (base case scenario, high-energy intensity, and transformation, state-growth scenarios) in order to get a glimpse of future patterns and assess the likely impacts of energy policies. The application of DSS for Uttara Kananda district energy planning focuses on renewable resources that could be harnessed for energy, land use database, sectorwise energy demand database and optimal allocation of energy resources for various tasks, and then explore the energy use consequences of alternative scenarios, such as, base case scenarios, high-energy intensity and improved end use efficiency options. Linear programming formulation for optimum allocation based on the cost minimisation objective shows that there is substantial savings of about 19.19% in energy and 36.24% cost reduction in overall energy system. Cost per unit (kWh) of energy with optimal allocation of energy is Rs. 0.31/kWh (as against Rs. 0.39/kWh without optimisation). Optimisation carried out with the objective of maximisation of efficiency of ‘ijk’ combination for all combinations shows energy saving of 19.98% and cost of energy as Rs. 0.34/kWh. The scenario analyses reveal that relatively vigorous growth in energy demand in Uttara Kannada district can be accomplished without exceeding available resources.

[1]  D. K. Subramanian,et al.  Domestic energy consumption patterns in Uttara Kannada District, Karnataka State, India , 2000 .

[2]  Brian J Parker,et al.  Decision support systems: The reality that seems hard to accept? , 1986 .

[3]  Rahul Pandey Energy policy modelling: agenda for developing countries , 2002 .

[4]  F. Urban,et al.  Modelling energy systems for developing countries , 2007 .

[5]  D. K. Subramanian,et al.  End use efficiencies in the domestic sector of Uttara Kannada District , 2000 .

[6]  J. Bruce,et al.  Climate change, 1995 : economic and social dimensions of climate change , 1997 .

[7]  T. Ramachandra,et al.  Spatial mapping of renewable energy potential , 2007 .

[8]  T. Ramachandra,et al.  Wind energy potential mapping in Karnataka, India, using GIS , 2005 .

[9]  Dionysis Assimacopoulos,et al.  Evaluation of Renewable Energy potential using a GIS decision support system , 1998 .

[10]  T. V. Ramachandra,et al.  Relevance of Hyperspectral Data for Sustainable Management of Natural Resources , 2006 .

[11]  Tv Ramachandra Scope for Solar Energy Devices in Kamataka State, India , 1996 .

[12]  D. K. Subramanian,et al.  Wind energy potential assessment in Uttara Kannada district of Karnataka, India , 1997 .

[13]  D. K. Subramanian,et al.  A decision support system for optimal design of hydroelectric projects in Uttara Kannada , 2001 .

[14]  D. K. Subramanian,et al.  Optimal design of hydroelectric projects in Uttara Kannada, India , 2000 .

[15]  Ibrahim Dincer,et al.  Exergy as a Driver for Achieving Sustainability , 2004 .

[16]  D. K. Subramanian,et al.  Energy requirements and conservation potential in industrial sector in Karnataka , 2001 .

[17]  Vinod Mubayi,et al.  Modelling energy-economic interactions in developing countries: a linear-programming approach , 1981 .

[18]  N. V. Beeck Classification of Energy Models , 1999 .

[19]  Tv Ramachandra,et al.  Decision Support System for Regional Domestic Energy Planning , 2005 .

[20]  D. K. Subramanian,et al.  Hydroelectric resource assessment in Uttara Kannada District, Karnataka State, India , 1999 .

[21]  Tv Ramachandra Renewable energy and energy conservation technologies , 2000 .

[22]  T. V. Ramachandra,et al.  Solar energy decision support system , 2005 .

[23]  Uttam Kumar,et al.  Geographic Resources Decision Support System – an Open Source GIS , 2004 .

[24]  A. Voss,et al.  Energy models for planning and policy assessment , 1981 .

[25]  T. Ramachandra,et al.  WEPA: Wind energy potential assessment-spatial decision support system , 2005 .

[26]  Mark Rylatt,et al.  GIS-based decision support for solar energy planning in urban environments , 2001 .

[27]  Michael Grubb,et al.  The Costs of Limiting Fossil-Fuel CO2 Emissions: A Survey and Analysis , 1993 .

[28]  Tv Ramachandra,et al.  Wind Energy Potential in Karnataka, India , 2003 .

[29]  D. K. Subramanian,et al.  Present and prospective role of bioenergy in regional energy system , 2000 .

[30]  R. B. Hirematha,et al.  Decentralized energy planning ; modeling and application — a review , 2006 .

[31]  T. Ramachandra,et al.  Bioresource status in Karnataka , 2004 .

[32]  Tv Ramachandra,et al.  Decision Support System to Assess Regional Biomass Energy Potential , 2005 .

[33]  Tv Ramachandra Ecologically Sound Integrated Regional Energy Planning , 2003 .

[34]  Tv Ramachandra Solar energy potential assessment using GIS , 2007 .

[35]  Tv Ramachandra,et al.  Spatial Decision Support System for Assessing Micro, Mini and Small Hydel Potential , 2004 .

[36]  TV Ramachandra Energy utilisation in rural industries in Karnataka , 1998 .

[37]  Tv Ramachandra,et al.  Energetics in paddy cultivation in Uttara Kannada district , 2001 .

[38]  Tv Ramachandra,et al.  Decision support system for regionalelectricity planning , 2006 .

[39]  D. K. Subramanian,et al.  Potential and prospects of solar energy in Uttara Kannada, District of Karnataka State, India , 1997 .