Modelling norms for autonomous agents

Societies are regulated by norms and, consequently autonomous agents that want to be part of such societies must be able to reason about norms. However, no reasoning can be doe if agents lack a model of norms that enables them to know how, by complying with norms, some of their goals might be affected. In this paper, a general model of norms is proposed. By contrast with current models of norms, our model emphasizes those aspects that autonomous agents might consider before taking decisions regarding norms. The model is applied to represent the most common kinds of norms that exist in a society, and its effectiveness to design systems of norms is shown.

[1]  J. Michael Spivey,et al.  The Z notation - a reference manual , 1992, Prentice Hall International Series in Computer Science.

[2]  Michael Luck,et al.  Towards a Model of the Dynamics of Normative Multi-Agent Systems , 2002 .

[3]  Munindar P. Singh.  An ontology for commitments in multiagent systems: , 1999, Artificial Intelligence and Law.

[4]  Magnus Boman,et al.  Norms in artificial decision making , 1999, Artificial Intelligence and Law.

[5]  Moshe Tennenholtz,et al.  Artificial Social Systems , 1992, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[6]  Cristiano Castelfranchi,et al.  Commitments: From Individual Intentions to Groups and Organizations , 1995, ICMAS.

[7]  Munindar P. Singh.  An ontology for commitments in multiagent systems: , 1999, Artificial Intelligence and Law.

[8]  Julian Padget,et al.  Formalizing a Language for Institutions and Norms , 2001, ATAL.

[9]  Frank Dignum,et al.  Towards socially sophisticated BDI agents , 2000, Proceedings Fourth International Conference on MultiAgent Systems.

[10]  Mihai Barbuceanu,et al.  Role of Obligations in Multiagent Coordination , 1999, Appl. Artif. Intell..

[11]  Michael Luck,et al.  Understanding Agent Systems , 2001, Springer Series on Agent Technology.

[12]  Cristiano Castelfranchi,et al.  Norms as Mental Objects - From Normative Beliefs to Normative Goals , 1993, MAAMAW.

[13]  Timo Steffens,et al.  Understanding Agent Systems , 2004, Künstliche Intell..

[14]  Nicholas R. Jennings,et al.  Rights and commitment in multi-agent agreements , 1998, Proceedings International Conference on Multi Agent Systems (Cat. No.98EX160).

[15]  Michael Luck,et al.  Agent technology: Enabling next generation computing , 2003 .

[16]  Alf Ross,et al.  Directives and norms , 1968 .

[17]  Michael Luck,et al.  Constraining autonomy through norms , 2002, AAMAS '02.

[18]  Nicholas R. Jennings,et al.  Commitments and conventions: The foundation of coordination in multi-agent systems , 1993, The Knowledge Engineering Review.

[19]  Frank Dignum,et al.  Autonomous agents with norms , 1999, Artificial Intelligence and Law.

[20]  R. Axelrod.  An Evolutionary Approach to Norms , 1986, American Political Science Review.

[21]  Marek J. Sergot,et al.  Deontic logic in the representation of law: Towards a methodology , 2004, Artificial Intelligence and Law.

[22]  Michael Luck,et al.  Agent technology: Enabling next generation computing , 2003 .

[23]  Marek J. Sergot,et al.  A Formal Characterisation of Institutionalised Power , 1996, Log. J. IGPL.