On-line portal imaging: image quality defining parameters for pelvic fields--a clinical evaluation.

PURPOSE A test of several image enhancement techniques, performed on on-line portal images in real clinical circumstances, is presented. In addition a score system enabling us to evaluate image quality on pelvic fields is proposed and validated. METHODS AND MATERIALS Localization images (n = 546) generated by an on-line portal imaging system during the treatment of 13 patients on pelvic fields were obtained by delivering a radiation dose of 6-8 cGy by an 18 MV photon beam, and recorded with a silicon intensified target video camera with adjustable gain, kV- and black level. Set-up errors were corrected before continuing irradiation. A scoring system based on the number of visible bone-soft tissue edges and transformed to a scale 0 to 5 was developed to judge image quality. A validation of this classification of images was performed with the use of transsectional bone-densities (bone-density*radiological path length) specified at the score defining landmarks. A high pass filter was used on all images, additional on-line open field subtraction was performed on 242 fields. Off-line study was performed in which a panel consisting of two groups (one composed of three radiation oncologists, the other of three radiotherapy technologists), scored 470 pelvic fields without further enhancement, and the same images with Contrast Limited Adaptive Histogram Equalization (CLAHE) (Pizer et al.). Two different clipping levels (3.0 and 5.0) were studied. RESULTS Gender and transsectional bone-densities were the most defining patient-related factors influencing image quality. Camera settings, gantry angle, and image post-processing were important non-patient-related factors. All investigators judged CLAHE to ameliorate low contrast images and to deteriorate good quality images (p < 0.001).

[1]  M van Herk,et al.  First clinical experience with a newly developed electronic portal imaging device. , 1990, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[2]  M Coghe,et al.  Routine clinical on-line portal imaging followed by immediate field adjustment using a tele-controlled patient couch. , 1992, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[3]  C. Cooper,et al.  Perspective how many women have osteoporosis? , 1992, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[4]  John D. Austin,et al.  Adaptive Histogram Equalization For Automatic Contrast Enhancement Of Medical Images , 1986, Other Conferences.

[5]  D Verellen,et al.  Interactive use of on-line portal imaging in pelvic radiation. , 1993, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[6]  P. Munro,et al.  Clinical evaluation of a fluoroscopic imaging device for radiotherapy localizaton , 1990 .

[7]  M W Vannier,et al.  A method to analyze 2-dimensional daily radiotherapy portal images from an on-line fiber-optic imaging system. , 1991, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[8]  K. Leszczynski,et al.  The enhancement of radiotherapy verification images by an automated edge detection technique. , 1992, Medical physics.

[9]  J. W. Epstein,et al.  On-line radiotherapy imaging with an array of fiber-optic image reducers. , 1990, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[10]  R. Morin,et al.  Comparison of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry and dual photon absorptiometry for bone mineral measurements of the lumbar spine. , 1988, Mayo Clinic proceedings.

[11]  A G Visser,et al.  Performance of a prototype fluoroscopic radiotherapy imaging system. , 1990, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[12]  G. A. Ferguson,et al.  Statistical analysis in psychology and education , 1960 .

[13]  W. Kalender,et al.  Reference values for trabecular and cortical vertebral bone density in single and dual-energy quantitative computed tomography. , 1989, European journal of radiology.

[14]  J Bijhold,et al.  Maximizing setup accuracy using portal images as applied to a conformal boost technique for prostatic cancer. , 1992, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[15]  Shlomo Shalev,et al.  Digital video system for on-line portal verification , 1990, Medical Imaging.

[16]  S Shalev,et al.  Video techniques for on-line portal imaging. , 1989, Computerized medical imaging and graphics : the official journal of the Computerized Medical Imaging Society.

[17]  Dirk Verellen,et al.  Relations of image quality in on-line portal images and patient individual parameters for pelvic field radiotherapy , 1992 .