Prognostic Significance of Predominant Histologic Pattern and Nuclear Grade in Resected Adenocarcinoma of the Lung: Potential Parameters for a Grading System

Introduction: Currently, no agreed histologic grading system exists for lung adenocarcinomas (ADCs). With a recently updated consensus classification, the aim of this study was to assess potential prognostic factors identifiable on routine histology, which might be used as grading parameters. Methods: A retrospective study of resected pulmonary ADCs (n = 238) in patients with stage IA to IIIB disease was carried out in which various histopathological parameters were correlated with survival data. The relationship between these factors and patient survivability was analyzed using Cox proportional hazards regression. Results: Mitotic rate was found to be a highly significant prognostic marker (p = 0.008), as was overall nuclear grade (p < 0.001). ADC subtyping was also found to be potentially important, as lepidic predominant (hazard ratio 0.99, p = 0.023) and solid predominant (hazard ratio 1.01, p = 0.003) subtypes were found to be independent (to age and tumor, node, metastasis category) prognostic predictors. Vessel invasion within tumor approached significance as a negative prognostic factor (p = 0.067). Conclusions: This study showed not only that histologic subtype and mitotic rate are important prognostic factors in lung ADCs, but also that other criteria described previously may not be useful in our specific patient population.

[1]  A. Ochiai,et al.  Cytologic factors associated with prognosis in patients with peripheral adenocarcinoma of the lung measuring 3 cm or less in greatest dimension , 2004, Cancer.

[2]  Akihiko Yoshizawa,et al.  Impact of proposed IASLC/ATS/ERS classification of lung adenocarcinoma: prognostic subgroups and implications for further revision of staging based on analysis of 514 stage I cases , 2011, Modern Pathology.

[3]  K. Miyoshi,et al.  Prognostic impact of intratumoral vessel invasion in completely resected pathologic stage I non-small cell lung cancer. , 2009, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[4]  N. Dubrawsky.  Cancer statistics , 1989, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[5]  J. Usuda,et al.  Pathological Vascular Invasion and Tumor Differentiation Predict Cancer Recurrence in Stage ia Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer After Complete Surgical Resection , 2012, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[6]  M. Vázquez,et al.  Risk of recurrence in patients with surgically resected stage I non-small cell lung carcinoma: histopathologic and immunohistochemical analysis. , 2003, Chest.

[7]  Masafumi Okada,et al.  Nuclear grading of primary pulmonary adenocarcinomas , 2010, Cancer.

[8]  A. Gown,et al.  Assessment of proliferative activity in breast cancer: MIB-1 immunohistochemistry versus mitotic figure count. , 1999, Human pathology.

[9]  Liquid Biopsies.  Non-small-cell lung cancer , 2015, Nature Reviews Disease Primers.

[10]  Masahiro Tsuboi,et al.  International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer/American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society International Multidisciplinary Classification of Lung Adenocarcinoma , 2011, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[11]  H. Sugimura,et al.  Lymphatic Vessel Invasion is a Significant Prognostic Indicator in Stage IA Lung Adenocarcinoma , 2011, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[12]  S. Ou,et al.  Primary Signet-Ring Carcinoma (SRC) of the Lung: A Population-Based Epidemiologic Study of 262 Cases with Comparison to Adenocarcinoma of the Lung , 2010, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[13]  Y. Nishiwaki,et al.  Histopathologic Features of the Tumor Budding in Adenocarcinoma of the Lung: Tumor Budding As an Index to Predict the Potential Aggressiveness , 2010, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[14]  Akihiko Yoshizawa,et al.  A Grading System of Lung Adenocarcinomas Based on Histologic Pattern is Predictive of Disease Recurrence in Stage I Tumors , 2010, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[15]  Y. Ishikawa,et al.  Possible mechanism of metastasis in lung adenocarcinomas with a micropapillary pattern , 2005, Pathology international.

[16]  Iver Petersen,et al.  Reproducibility of histopathological subtypes and invasion in pulmonary adenocarcinoma. An international interobserver study , 2012, Modern Pathology.

[17]  N. Isowa,et al.  Lung adenocarcinomas with micropapillary components , 2009, General thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[18]  A. Jemal,et al.  Cancer Statistics, 2008 , 2008, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[19]  Karsten Schlüns,et al.  Core classification of lung cancer: correlating nuclear size and mitoses with ploidy and clinicopathological parameters. , 2009, Lung cancer.

[20]  J. Farber,et al.  Arterial invasion predicts early mortality in stage I non-small cell lung cancer. , 2004, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[21]  Elisabeth Brambilla,et al.  Pathology and genetics of tumours of the lung , pleura, thymus and heart , 2004 .

[22]  C. Sima,et al.  A nuclear grading system is a strong predictor of survival in epitheloid diffuse malignant pleural mesothelioma , 2012, Modern Pathology.

[23]  W. Gerald,et al.  Lung Adenocarcinoma: Modification of the 2004 WHO Mixed Subtype to Include the Major Histologic Subtype Suggests Correlations Between Papillary and Micropapillary Adenocarcinoma Subtypes, EGFR Mutations and Gene Expression Analysis , 2008, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[24]  M. Noguchi,et al.  Prognostication of small-sized primary pulmonary adenocarcinomas by histopathological and karyometric analysis. , 2005, Lung cancer.

[25]  Y. Ishikawa,et al.  Early-Stage Lung Adenocarcinomas With a Micropapillary Pattern, a Distinct Pathologic Marker for a Significantly Poor Prognosis , 2003, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[26]  Y. Nishiwaki,et al.  Primary Lung Carcinoma With Signet-ring Cell Carcinoma Components: Clinicopathological Analysis of 39 Cases , 2004, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[27]  Zoe Wainer,et al.  Does Lung Adenocarcinoma Subtype Predict Patient Survival?: A Clinicopathologic Study Based on the New International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer/American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society International Multidisciplinary Lung Adenocarcinoma Classification , 2011, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[28]  S. Suster,et al.  Primary signet ring cell adenocarcinomas of the lung: a clinicopathological study of 15 cases , 2001, Histopathology.

[29]  Anthony J Alberg,et al.  Epidemiology of lung cancer: ACCP evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (2nd edition). , 2007, Chest.