Flashback and blowoff characteristics of gas turbine swirlcombustor

Gas turbines are extensively used in combined cycle power systems. These form about 20% of global power generating capacity, normally being fired on natural gas, but this is expected in the future to move towards hydrogen enriched gaseous fuels to reduce CO2 emissions. Gas turbine combined cycles can give electrical power generation efficiencies of up to 60%, with the aim of increasing this to 70% in the next 10 to 15 years, whilst at the same time substantially reducing emissions of contaminants such as NOx. The gas turbine combustor is an essential and critical component here. These are universally stabilized with swirl flows, which give very wide blowoff limits, and with appropriate modification can be adjusted to give very low NOx and other emission. Lean premixed combustion is commonly used at pressures between 15 to 30 bar, these even out hot spots and minimise formation of thermal NOx. Problems arise because improving materials technology/improved cooling techniques allow higher turbine inlet temperatures, hence higher efficiencies, but with the drawback of potentially higher emissions and stability problems. This PhD study has widely investigated and analysed two different kinds of gas turbine swirl burners. The research has included experimental investigation and computational simulation. Mainly, the flashback and blowoff limits have been comprehensively analysed to investigate their effect upon swirl burner operation. The study was extended by using different gas mixtures, including either pure gas or a combination of more than one gas like natural gas, methane, hydrogen and carbon dioxide. The first combustor is a 100 kW tangential swirl combustor made of stainless steel that has been experimentally and theoretically analysed to study and mitigate the effect of flashback phenomena. The use of a central fuel injector, cylindrical confinement and exhaust sleeve are shown to give large benefits in terms of flashback resistance and acts to reduce and sometimes eliminate any coherent structures which may be located along the axis of symmetry. The Critical Boundary Velocity Gradient is used for characterisation of flashback, both via the original Lewis and von Elbe formula and via new analysis using CFD and investigation of boundary layer conditions just in front of the flame front. Conclusions are drawn as to mitigation technologies. It is recognized how isothermal conditions produce strong Precessing Vortex Cores that are fundamental in producing the ii final flow field, whilst the Central Recirculation Zones are dependent on pressure decay ratio inside the combustion chamber. Combustion conditions showed the high similarity between experiments and simulation. Flashback was demonstrated to be a factor highly related to the strength of the Central Recirculation Zone for those cases where a Combustion Induced Vortex Breakdown was allowed to enter the swirl chamber, whilst cases where a bluff body impeded its passage showed a considerable improvement to the resistance of the phenomenon. The use of nozzle constrictions also reduced flashback at high Reynolds number (Re). All these results were intended to contribute to better designs of future combustors. The second piece of work of this PhD research included comprehensive experimental work using a generic swirl burner (with three different blade inserts to give different swirl numbers) and has been used to examine the phenomena of flashback and blowoff in the swirl burner in the context of lean premixed combustion. Cylindrical and conical confinements have been set up and assembled with the original design of the generic swirl combustor. In addition to that, multi-fuel blends used during the experimental work include pure methane, pure hydrogen, hydrogen / methane mixture, carbon dioxide/ methane mixture and coke oven gas. The above investigational analysis has proved the flashback limits decrease when swirl numbers decrease for the fuel blends that contain 30% or less hydrogen. Confinements would improve the flashback limit as well. Blowoff limits improve with a lower swirl number and it is easier to recognise the gradual extinction of the flame under blowoff conditions. The use of exhaust confinement has created a considerable improvement in blowoff. Hydrogen enriched fuels can improve the blowoff limit in terms of increasing heat release, which is higher than heat release with natural gas. However, the confinements complicate the flashback, especially when the fuel contains a high percentage of hydrogen. The flashback propensity of the hydrogen/methane blends becomes quite strong. The most important features in gas turbines is the possibility of using different kinds of fuel. This matter has been discussed extensively in this project. By matching flashback/blowoff limits, it has been found that for fuels containing up to 30% of hydrogen, the designer would be able to switch the same gas turbine combustor to multifuels whilst producing the same power output.

[1]  Shaohua Wu,et al.  Gas/particle flow characteristics of a centrally fuel rich swirl coal combustion burner , 2008 .

[2]  J. P. Longwell,et al.  Flame stabilization by bluff bodies and turbulent flames in ducts , 1953 .

[3]  F. Menter Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications , 1994 .

[4]  Joseph Grumer,et al.  Flame stabilization on burners with short ports or noncircular ports , 1953 .

[5]  Wolfgang Polifke,et al.  An Efficient Computational Model for Premixed Turbulent Combustion at High Reynolds Numbers Based on a Turbulent Flame Speed Closure , 1997 .

[6]  Xianming Li,et al.  Computational Fluid Dynamics in Industrial Combustion , 2001 .

[7]  Timothy O'Doherty,et al.  THE EFFECT OF COMBUSTION INSTABILITY ON THE STRUCTURE OF RECIRCULATION ZONES IN CONFINED SWIRLING FLAMES , 2005 .

[8]  Christopher M. Boggs,et al.  Influence of H2 on the response of lean premixed CH4 flames to high strained flows , 2003 .

[9]  Nicholas Syred Generation and Alleviation of Combustion Instabilities in Swirling Flow , 2007 .

[10]  Thomas Sattelmayer,et al.  Analysis of combustion induced vortex breakdown driven flame flashback in a premix burner with cylindrical mixing zone , 2007 .

[11]  T. Lieuwen,et al.  A Mechanism of Combustion Instability in Lean Premixed Gas Turbine Combustors , 2001 .

[12]  Thomas Sattelmayer,et al.  Low NOx Premixed Combustion of MBtu Fuels in a Research Burner , 1996 .

[13]  N. Syred A review of oscillation mechanisms and the role of the precessing vortex core (PVC) in swirl combustion systems , 2006 .

[14]  Tim Lieuwen,et al.  Syngas Mixture Composition Effects Upon Flashback and Blowout , 2006 .

[15]  C. Tropea,et al.  Computational Modelling of Turbulent Mixing in Confined Swirling Environment Under Constant and Variable Density Conditions , 2005 .

[16]  Bernard Lewis,et al.  Combustion, Flames and Explosions of Gases , 2013 .

[17]  D. Wilcox Turbulence modeling for CFD , 1993 .

[18]  Anthony John Griffiths,et al.  The effect of hydrogen containing fuel blends upon flashback in swirl burners , 2012 .

[19]  Nicholas Syred,et al.  Advanced Combustion and Aerothermal Technologies , 2007 .

[20]  Dilek Funda Kurtulus,et al.  CO2 addition and pressure effects on laminar and turbulent lean premixed CH4 air flames , 2009 .

[21]  J. Ogden Developing an infrastructure for hydrogen vehicles: a Southern California case study , 1999 .

[22]  Vigor Yang,et al.  Effect of swirl on combustion dynamics in a lean-premixed swirl-stabilized combustor , 2005 .

[23]  Ajay K. Agrawal,et al.  Combustion of hydrogen-enriched methane in a lean premixed swirl-stabilized burner , 2002 .

[24]  Nicholas Syred,et al.  Large coherent structures visualization in a swirl burner , 2008 .

[25]  Hideaki Kobayashi,et al.  Effects of CO2 dilution on turbulent premixed flames at high pressure and high temperature , 2007 .

[26]  A. Lefebvre Gas Turbine Combustion , 1983 .

[27]  James Gleick,et al.  Chaos, Making a New Science , 1987 .

[28]  M. Stöhr,et al.  Simultaneous OH-PLIF and PIV measurements in a gas turbine model combustor , 2008 .

[29]  Anthony John Griffiths,et al.  Characterization of large coherent structures in a swirl burner under combustion conditions , 2009 .

[30]  James F. Driscoll,et al.  Vortex-shedding and mixing layer effects on periodic flashback in a lean premixed prevaporized gas turbine combustor , 2009 .

[31]  Anthony John Griffiths,et al.  Premixed swirl combustion and flashback analysis with hydrogen/methane mixtures , 2010 .

[32]  Johannes Janicka,et al.  Unsteady methods (URANS and LES) for simulation of combustion systems , 2006 .

[33]  Ajay K. Agrawal,et al.  Fuel Composition Effects on the Velocity Field in a Lean Premixed Swirl-Stabilized Combustor , 2003 .

[34]  C. Law,et al.  Direct Numerical Simulations of Turbulent Lean Premixed Combustion. , 2006 .

[35]  Jochen Ströhle,et al.  An evaluation of detailed reaction mechanisms for hydrogen combustion under gas turbine conditions , 2007 .

[36]  Andreas Dreizler,et al.  Experimental analysis of flashback in lean premixed swirling flames: conditions close to flashback , 2007 .

[37]  Shuwei Huang,et al.  Improving the combustion performance of lean hydrocarbon mixtures by hydrogen addition , 1994 .

[38]  C. C. Liu,et al.  Effects of H2 or CO2 addition, equivalence ratio, and turbulent straining on turbulent burning velocities for lean premixed methane combustion , 2008 .

[39]  Giovanni Lozza,et al.  Using Hydrogen as Gas Turbine Fuel , 2003 .

[40]  C Thompson,et al.  Applied CFD techniques: An introduction based on finite element methods , 2002 .

[41]  Audrius Bagdanavicius,et al.  Burning Velocities of Alternative Gaseous Fuels at Elevated Temperature and Pressure , 2010 .

[42]  Olivier Colin,et al.  Large-eddy simulation of a fuel-lean premixed turbulent swirl-burner , 2008 .

[43]  Tim Lieuwen,et al.  Burner Development and Operability Issues Associated with Steady Flowing Syngas Fired Combustors , 2008 .

[44]  Henry Cohen,et al.  Gas turbine theory , 1973 .

[45]  Hukam Mongia,et al.  Experimental Study on Coherent Structures of a Counter-rotating Multi-Swirler Cup , 2007 .

[46]  M. Heitor,et al.  Coherent structures in unsteady swirling jet flow , 2006 .

[47]  Thomas Sattelmayer,et al.  Flashback Limits for Combustion Induced Vortex Breakdown in a Swirl Burner , 2003 .

[48]  Juan Lopez,et al.  Axisymmetric vortex breakdown Part 2. Physical mechanisms , 1990, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[49]  Anil Date,et al.  Introduction to Computational Fluid Dynamics , 2023, essentials.

[50]  Forman A. Williams,et al.  Burning velocity of turbulent premixed flames in a high-pressure environment , 1996 .

[51]  Kevin Brundish,et al.  Variable Fuel Placement Injector Development , 2003 .

[52]  Anthony John Griffiths,et al.  Visualisation of isothermal large coherent structures in a swirl burner , 2009 .

[53]  Benjamin T. Chorpening,et al.  Flashback Detection Sensor for Hydrogen Augmented Natural Gas Combustion , 2007 .

[54]  Thomas Sattelmayer,et al.  Flashback in a Swirl Burner With Cylindrical Premixing Zone , 2004 .

[55]  S. Patankar Numerical Heat Transfer and Fluid Flow , 2018, Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering.

[56]  Jiang Wu,et al.  A study on fractal characteristics of aerodynamic field in low-NOx coaxial swirling burner , 2004 .