论文信息 - Impression Formation and Impression Management: Motives, Traits, and Likeability Inferred from Self-Promoting and Self-Deprecating Behavior

Impression Formation and Impression Management: Motives, Traits, and Likeability Inferred from Self-Promoting and Self-Deprecating Behavior

Two scenario studies examined the effects of a person's statement about own abilities and the possibility that the statement could be publicly verified by a subsequent test. Inferences of competence, likeability, and self-presentational motives were assessed. As predicted, a low-ability claim was perceived as more strongly driven by self-presentational motives (being modest or creating a defence against failure) when the ability was going to be tested than when it was not; a high-ability claim was perceived as more strongly driven by self-presentation (impressing others and bragging) when the claim could not be verified. These inferences of motives appeared to mediate trait inferences (judgments of the actor's true competence). In addition, cognitive load affected likeability ratings, but not trait inferences, suggesting that traits were inferred with greater efficiency and that likeability ratings were derived indirectly from inferences of traits and motives. The results illustrate the interplay between trait inferences and lay theories of self-presentational behavior, as well as the relationships between inferences of motives, traits, and likeability.

R. Vonk | Roos Vonk

[1] Donal E. Carlston,et al. The recall and use of traits and events in social inference processes , 1980 .

[2] E. E. Jones,et al. When Self-Presentation is Constrained by the Target's Knowledge: Consistency and Compensation. , 1978 .

[3] R. Hastie,et al. The relationship between memory and judgment depends on whether the judgment task is memory-based or on-line , 1986 .

[4] D. A. Kenny,et al. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[5] J. N. Bassili. Procedural Efficiency and the Spontaneity of Trait Inference , 1993 .

[6] John J. Skowronski,et al. Savings in the relearning of trait information as evidence for spontaneous inference generation. , 1994 .

[7] D. Gilbert,et al. The correspondence bias. , 1995, Psychological bulletin.

[8] A. Baumgardner,et al. Strategic failure in social interaction: Evidence for expectancy disconfirmation processes. , 1987 .

[9] E. E. Jones,et al. Role playing variations and their informational value for person perception. , 1961, Journal of abnormal and social psychology.