Pairwise Optimal Weight Realization—Acceleration Technique for Set-Theoretic Adaptive Parallel Subgradient Projection Algorithm

The adaptive parallel subgradient projection (PSP) algorithm was proposed in 2002 as a set-theoretic adaptive filtering algorithm providing fast and stable convergence, robustness against noise, and low computational complexity by using weighted parallel projections onto multiple time-varying closed half-spaces. In this paper, we present a novel weighting technique named pairwise optimal weight realization (POWER) for further acceleration of the adaptive PSP algorithm. A simple closed-form formula is derived to compute the projection onto the intersection of two closed half-spaces defined by a triplet of vectors. Using the formula inductively, the proposed weighting technique realizes a good direction of update. The resulting weights turn out to be pairwise optimal in a certain sense. The proposed algorithm has the inherently parallel structure composed of q primitive functions, hence its total computational complexity O(qrN) is reduced to O(rN) with q concurrent processors (r: a constant positive integer). Numerical examples demonstrate that the proposed technique for r=1 yields significantly faster convergence than not only adaptive PSP with uniform weights, affine projection algorithm, and fast Newton transversal filters but also the regularized recursive least squares algorithm

[1]  L. Ljung,et al.  Fast calculation of gain matrices for recursive estimation schemes , 1978 .

[2]  P. L. Combettes The foundations of set theoretic estimation , 1993 .

[3]  Heinz H. Bauschke,et al.  A Weak-to-Strong Convergence Principle for Fejé-Monotone Methods in Hilbert Spaces , 2001, Math. Oper. Res..

[4]  A. Benallal,et al.  A new method to stabilize fast RLS algorithms based on a first-order of the propagation of numerical errors , 1988, ICASSP-88., International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.

[5]  Isao Yamada,et al.  Efficient Adaptive Stereo Echo Canceling Schemes Based on Simultaneous Use of Multiple State Data , 2004 .

[6]  Isao Yamada,et al.  An efficient robust adaptive filtering algorithm based on parallel subgradient projection techniques , 2002, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[7]  Markus Rupp A family of adaptive filter algorithms with decorrelating properties , 1998, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[8]  George Carayannis,et al.  A fast sequential algorithm for least-squares filtering and prediction , 1983 .

[9]  J. L. Hall,et al.  Stereophonic acoustic echo cancellation-an overview of the fundamental problem , 1995, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[10]  Isao Yamada,et al.  Adaptive projected subgradient method and its applications to set theoretic adaptive filtering , 2003, The Thrity-Seventh Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems & Computers, 2003.

[11]  D. Luenberger Optimization by Vector Space Methods , 1968 .

[12]  I. Yamada,et al.  Adaptive Projected Subgradient Method for Asymptotic Minimization of Sequence of Nonnegative Convex Functions , 2005 .

[13]  T. Kailath,et al.  Fast, recursive-least-squares transversal filters for adaptive filtering , 1984 .

[14]  Heinz H. Bauschke,et al.  Projection algorithms and monotone operators , 1996 .

[15]  Isao Yamada,et al.  Efficient Blind MAI Suppression in DS/CDMA Systems by Embedded Constraint Parallel Projection Techniques , 2005, IEICE Trans. Fundam. Electron. Commun. Comput. Sci..

[16]  Isao Yamada,et al.  Adaptive projected subgradient method and its acceleration techniques , 2004 .

[17]  Shirish Nagaraj,et al.  Set-membership filtering and a set-membership normalized LMS algorithm with an adaptive step size , 1998, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[18]  Heinz H. Bauschke,et al.  On Projection Algorithms for Solving Convex Feasibility Problems , 1996, SIAM Rev..

[19]  Steven L. Grant Dynamically Regularized Fast RLS with Application to Echo Cancellation , 1996 .

[20]  A. Ekpenyong,et al.  Frequency-domain adaptive filtering: a set-membership approach , 2003, The Thrity-Seventh Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems & Computers, 2003.

[21]  A. A. Beex,et al.  Convergence behavior of affine projection algorithms , 2000, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[22]  T. Hinamoto,et al.  Extended theory of learning identification , 1975 .

[23]  D.T.M. Stock The block underdetermined covariance (BUC) fast transversal filter (FTF) algorithm for adaptive filtering , 1992, [1992] Conference Record of the Twenty-Sixth Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems & Computers.

[24]  Steven L. Gay,et al.  The fast affine projection algorithm , 1995, 1995 International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.

[25]  Kazuhiko Ozeki,et al.  An adaptive filtering algorithm using an orthogonal projection to an affine subspace and its properties , 1984 .

[26]  Sergios Theodoridis,et al.  Fast Newton transversal filters-a new class of adaptive estimation algorithms , 1991, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[27]  Ali H. Sayed,et al.  H∞ optimality of the LMS algorithm , 1996, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[28]  G. Moustakides Correcting the instability due to finite precision of the fast Kalman identification algorithms , 1989 .

[29]  Isao Yamada,et al.  Acceleration of adaptive parallel projection algorithms by Pairwise Optimal WEight Realization , 2004, 2004 12th European Signal Processing Conference.

[30]  George V. Moustakides,et al.  Stabilizing the fast Kalman algorithms , 1989, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process..

[31]  George-Othon Glentis,et al.  Efficient least squares adaptive algorithms for FIR transversal filtering , 1999, IEEE Signal Process. Mag..

[32]  Isao Yamada,et al.  Efficient Fast Stereo Acoustic Echo Cancellation Based on Pairwise Optimal Weight Realization Technique , 2006, EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process..

[33]  Jacob Benesty,et al.  Adaptive Signal Processing: Applications to Real-World Problems , 2003 .

[34]  T. Kailath,et al.  Numerically stable fast transversal filters for recursive least squares adaptive filtering , 1991, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[35]  Jacob Benesty,et al.  Acoustic signal processing for telecommunication , 2000 .

[36]  James R. Zeidler,et al.  Adaptive tracking of linear time-variant systems by extended RLS algorithms , 1997, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[37]  J. Nagumo,et al.  A learning method for system identification , 1967, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[38]  Shu Hung Leung,et al.  Gradient-based variable forgetting factor RLS algorithm in time-varying environments , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[39]  Paulo Sergio Ramirez,et al.  Fundamentals of Adaptive Filtering , 2002 .

[40]  S. Haykin,et al.  Adaptive Filter Theory , 1986 .

[41]  D. Meeter Stochastic Approximation and Nonlinear Regression , 1969 .