When transparency and collaboration collide: The USA Open Data program

President Obama's inaugural flagship Open Data program emphasizes the values of transparency, participation, and collaboration in governmental work. The Open Data performance data analysis, published here for the first time, proposes that most federal agencies have adopted a passive–aggressive attitude toward this program by appearing to cooperate with the program while in fact effectively ignoring it. The analysis further suggests that a tiny group of agencies are the only “real players” in the web arena. This research highlights the contradiction between Open Data's transparency goal (“All data must be freed”) and federal agencies' goal of collaborating with each other through data trade. The research also suggests that agencies comprehended that Open Data is likely to exacerbate three critical, back-office data-integration problems: inclusion, confusion, and diffusion. The article concludes with a proposal to develop an alternative Federal Information Marketplace (FIM) to incentivize agencies to improve data sharing. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

[1]  W. Waugh.  Blacked Out: Government Secrecy in the Information Age , 2008 .

[2]  B. Noveck.  Wiki Government: How Technology Can Make Government Better, Democracy Stronger, and Citizens More Powerful , 2009 .

[3]  Kathleen Bawn.  Political Control Versus Expertise: Congressional Choices about Administrative Procedures , 1995, American Political Science Review.

[4]  W. Dutton,et al.  The Interests Served B Y Technological Reform , 1979 .

[5]  Rob Kling,et al.  The Institutional Character of Computerized Information Systems , 1989 .

[6]  Amy B. Zegart,et al.  Blue Ribbons, Black Boxes: Toward a Better Understanding of Presidential Commissions , 2004 .

[7]  James Beverage,et al.  The Privacy Act of 1974: An Overview , 1976 .

[8]  A. Schneider,et al.  Behavioral Assumptions of Policy Tools , 1990, The Journal of Politics.

[9]  R. Kling.  Value Conflicts in Computing Developments: Developed and Developing Countries. , 1983 .

[10]  John Leslie King,et al.  Centralized versus decentralized computing: organizational considerations and management options , 1983, CSUR.

[11]  Rob Kling,et al.  The Political Character of Computerization in Service Organizations: Citizen Interests or Bureaucratic Control , 1983 .

[12]  Jay D. White.  Managing Information in the Public Sector , 2007 .

[13]  Thomas Schwartz,et al.  Congressional Oversight Over-looked: Police Patrol versus Fire Alarms , 1984 .

[14]  James N. Danziger,et al.  Computers and Politics: High Technology in American Local Governments , 1982 .

[15]  Jason L. Dedrick,et al.  Computing and Public Organizations , 1986 .

[16]  F. E. Rourke,et al.  Secrecy and Publicity: Dilemmas of Democracy. , 1962 .

[17]  Patrice McDermott,et al.  Building open government , 2010, Gov. Inf. Q..

[18]  David Lazer,et al.  Governance and Information Technology: From Electronic Government to Information Government , 2007 .

[19]  Roger G. Noll,et al.  STRUCTURE AND PROCESS, POLITICS AND POLICY: ADMINISTRATIVE ARRANGEMENTS AND THE POLITICAL CONTROL OF AGENCIES , 1989 .

[20]  Francesco Giovannoni,et al.  Deliberate Discretion?: The Institutional Foundations of Bureaucratic Autonomy. , 2004 .

[21]  George A. Krause,et al.  Institutional Design versus Reputational Effects on Bureaucratic Performance: Evidence from U.S. Government Macroeconomic and Fiscal Projections , 2004 .

[22]  R. Kling,et al.  Book Review: Computerization and Controversy: Value Conflicts and Social Choices , 1991 .

[23]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  The Dynamics of Computing , 1985 .

[24]  Sharyn O'Halloran,et al.  Delegating Powers: A Transaction Cost Politics Approach to Policy Making under Separate Powers , 1999 .

[25]  Cary Coglianese,et al.  The Transparency President? The Obama Administration and Open Government , 2009 .

[26]  Susan L. Moffitt.  Promoting Agency Reputation through Public Advice: Advisory Committee Use in the FDA , 2010, The Journal of Politics.

[27]  J D Mahoney,et al.  The market for human tissue. , 2000, Virginia law review.

[28]  Rob Kling,et al.  The control of information systems developments after implementation , 1984, CACM.

[29]  Kenneth J. Meier,et al.  Politics and the bureaucracy: Policymaking in the fourth branch of government , 1979 .

[30]  Henning Schmidgen,et al.  Science on stage : expert advice as public drama , 2003 .

[31]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  Computers and local government , 1977 .

[32]  G. Asrar,et al.  Testimony of Dr , 2002 .

[33]  Jason Webb Yackee,et al.  A Bias Towards Business? Assessing Interest Group Influence on the U.S. Bureaucracy , 2006, The Journal of Politics.

[34]  D. Stone.  Policy Paradox: The Art of Political Decision Making , 1997 .

[35]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  PAYOFFS FROM COMPUTERIZATION - LESSONS OVER TIME , 1990 .

[36]  J. Weiss,et al.  Using knowledge for control in fragmented policy arenas , 1984 .

[37]  Rob Kling,et al.  Social Analyses of Computing: Theoretical Perspectives in Recent Empirical Research , 1980, CSUR.

[38]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  COMPUTERS AND THE CONSTITUTION - A HELPFUL, HARMFUL OR HARMLESS RELATIONSHIP , 1987 .

[39]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  Technology and Urban Management , 1977 .

[40]  Rob Kling,et al.  The Web of Computing: Computer Technology as Social Organization , 1982, Adv. Comput..

[41]  Rob Kling,et al.  Value conflicts in the deployment of computing applications , 1984, CSC '84.

[42]  John R. Wright,et al.  Interest Groups, Advisory Committees, and Congressional Control of the Bureaucracy , 2001 .

[43]  K. Kraemer,et al.  Datawars: The Politics of Modeling in Federal Policymaking , 1987 .

[44]  Roger G. Noll,et al.  Administrative Procedures as Instruments of Political Control , 1987 .

[45]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  The Management of Computer Applications in Local Government , 1982 .

[46]  G. Taylor.  People and Computers , 1991 .

[47]  Davi M. D'Agostino.  Defense Biometrics: DOD Can Better Conform to Standards and Share Biometric Information with Federal Agencies , 2011 .

[48]  P. Joskow,et al.  The European Union's emissions trading system in perspective , 2008 .