Gait and force analysis of provoked pig gait on clean and fouled rubber mat surfaces

Materials that increase floor friction forces in absorption of foot pressure could reduce the risk of slipping, i.e. promote walking safety. The effects of fouled rubber mat floor condition on the gait of 10 pigs walking in a curve, using kinematics and kinetics to record gait parameters and slip frequency, are described and compared with clean conditions. Pigs adapted to fouled floor conditions through reduced walking speed (10%), prolonged swing and stance time, and a higher number of 3-limb support phases, but kept stride length and diagonality constant. This adaption produced a threefold reduction in lateral horizontal forces and kept braking and propulsion forces constant, resulting in a constant peak utilised coefficient of friction (UCOF) level in fore limbs but a 31% reduction in UCOF in hind limbs. The better traction for pigs walking on rubber matting compared with concrete is due to a more effective transmission of forces from the limb to the elastomer, dissipating the forces into energy within the material, and thus impeding the effect of centripetal force, with less displacement of body centre of gravity and less forward and backward slip. Pig forward slip frequency on fouled rubber matting was 65 and 51% lower for fore and hind limbs respectively compared with pigs walking a curve on fouled concrete. The soft flooring material improved gait adaption and could thus improve walking safety.

[1]  N. G. Webb,et al.  Flooring and injury--an overview , 1983 .

[2]  N. Devillers,et al.  Effects of a new housing system and temperature on sow behaviour during lactation , 2008 .

[3]  L. Lidfors,et al.  Dairy cow preferences for soft or hard flooring when standing or walking. , 2007, Journal of dairy science.

[4]  D. Weary,et al.  Hoof pathologies influence kinematic measures of dairy cow gait. , 2005, Journal of dairy science.

[5]  M. Redfern,et al.  Biomechanics of descending ramps , 1997 .

[6]  W A Weijs,et al.  Frictional forces required for unrestrained locomotion in dairy cattle. , 2005, Journal of dairy science.

[7]  M S Redfern,et al.  Predicting slips and falls considering required and available friction. , 1999, Ergonomics.

[8]  R. Cham,et al.  Heel contact dynamics during slip events on level and inclined surfaces , 2002 .

[9]  N. G. Webb,et al.  Compressive stresses on, and the strength of the inner and outer digits of pigs' feet, and the implications for injury and floor design , 1984 .

[10]  M. Cartmill,et al.  Support polygons and symmetrical gaits in mammals , 2002 .

[11]  B R Jensen,et al.  Biomechanical gait analysis of pigs walking on solid concrete floor. , 2007, Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience.

[12]  T. Widowski,et al.  Footing and gait of pigs on different concrete surfaces. , 1988, Journal of animal science.

[13]  Hans von Wachenfelt,et al.  Gait and force analysis methods applied in pig gait research , 2010 .

[14]  C. Phillips,et al.  The locomotion of dairy cows on concrete floors that are dry, wet, or covered with a slurry of excreta. , 2000, Journal of dairy science.

[15]  Stefan Pinzke,et al.  Force analysis of unprovoked pig gait on clean and fouled concrete surfaces , 2008 .

[16]  C. Nilsson,et al.  Floors in animal houses. Technical design with respect to the biological needs of animals in reference to the thermal, friction and abrasive characteristics and the softness of the flooring material , 1988 .

[17]  J. M. Brault,et al.  Utilized coefficient of friction during walking: static estimates exceed measured values. , 2002, Journal of forensic sciences.

[18]  Christopher M Powers,et al.  Comparison of utilized coefficient of friction during different walking tasks in persons with and without a disability. , 2005, Gait & posture.

[19]  H M Clayton Gait analysis comes of age. , 1999, Veterinary journal.

[20]  R Grönqvist,et al.  Human-centred approaches in slipperiness measurement , 2001, Ergonomics.

[21]  D J Sanderson,et al.  Softer, higher-friction flooring improves gait of cows with and without sole ulcers. , 2007, Journal of dairy science.

[22]  J. Mee,et al.  The effect of rubber versus concrete passageways in cubicle housing on claw health and reproduction of pluriparous dairy cows , 2007 .

[23]  von Wachenfelt,et al.  Gait Analysis of Unprovoked Pig Gait on Clean and Fouled Concrete Surfaces , 2009 .

[24]  B. Jørgensen,et al.  Influence of floor type and stocking density on leg weakness, osteochondrosis and claw disorders in slaughter pigs , 2003 .

[25]  M S Redfern,et al.  Biomechanics of slips , 2001, Ergonomics.

[26]  D. Weary,et al.  Effects of pasture on lameness in dairy cows. , 2007, Journal of dairy science.

[27]  R. Cham,et al.  Changes in gait when anticipating slippery floors. , 2002, Gait & Posture.

[28]  S. Pinzke,et al.  Gait and force analysis of provoked pig gait on clean and fouled concrete surfaces. , 2009 .

[29]  D. A. Smith,et al.  Biotin-supplementation of diets; the incidence of foot lesions, and the reproductive performance of sows , 1977, Veterinary Record.